[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/po limit-patent-effect.fr.po lim...
From: |
GNUN |
Subject: |
www/philosophy/po limit-patent-effect.fr.po lim... |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 23:28:56 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 13/03/25 23:28:56
Modified files:
philosophy/po : limit-patent-effect.fr.po
limit-patent-effect.pot
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/limit-patent-effect.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/limit-patent-effect.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
Patches:
Index: limit-patent-effect.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/limit-patent-effect.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -b -r1.9 -r1.10
--- limit-patent-effect.fr.po 16 Mar 2013 08:10:40 -0000 1.9
+++ limit-patent-effect.fr.po 25 Mar 2013 23:28:56 -0000 1.10
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: limit-patent-effect.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-02-02 04:25-0500\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-03-25 19:25-0300\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-03-13 16:33+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2013-03-25 19:25-0300\n"
"Plural-Forms: \n"
"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
@@ -142,9 +143,30 @@
"menacent le système dans son ensemble est de l'ordre de 100 000."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | If half of those patents were eliminated as “bad
+# | [-quality”—i.e., mistakes-] {+quality”—mistakes+}
+# | of the patent system{+,+} that is—it would not really change things.
+# | Whether 100,000 patents or 50,000, it's the same disaster. This is why
+# | it's a mistake to limit our criticism of software patents to just
+# | “patent trolls” or “bad quality” patents. The
+# | worst patent aggressor today is Apple, which isn't a “troll”
+# | by the usual definition; I don't know whether Apple's patents are
+# | “good quality”, but the better the patent's
+# | “quality” the more dangerous its threat.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "If half of those patents were eliminated as “bad quality”"
+#| "—i.e., mistakes of the patent system that is—it would not "
+#| "really change things. Whether 100,000 patents or 50,000, it's the same "
+#| "disaster. This is why it's a mistake to limit our criticism of software "
+#| "patents to just “patent trolls” or “bad quality” "
+#| "patents. The worst patent aggressor today is Apple, which isn't a “"
+#| "troll” by the usual definition; I don't know whether Apple's "
+#| "patents are “good quality”, but the better the patent's "
+#| "“quality” the more dangerous its threat."
msgid ""
"If half of those patents were eliminated as “bad quality”—"
-"i.e., mistakes of the patent system that is—it would not really change "
+"mistakes of the patent system, that is—it would not really change "
"things. Whether 100,000 patents or 50,000, it's the same disaster. This is "
"why it's a mistake to limit our criticism of software patents to just “"
"patent trolls” or “bad quality” patents. The worst patent "
Index: limit-patent-effect.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/limit-patent-effect.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- limit-patent-effect.pot 2 Feb 2013 09:28:33 -0000 1.1
+++ limit-patent-effect.pot 25 Mar 2013 23:28:56 -0000 1.2
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: limit-patent-effect.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-02-02 04:25-0500\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-03-25 19:25-0300\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -102,13 +102,13 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
"If half of those patents were eliminated as “bad "
-"quality”—i.e., mistakes of the patent system that is—it "
-"would not really change things. Whether 100,000 patents or 50,000, it's the "
-"same disaster. This is why it's a mistake to limit our criticism of "
-"software patents to just “patent trolls” or “bad "
-"quality” patents. The worst patent aggressor today is Apple, which "
-"isn't a “troll” by the usual definition; I don't know whether "
-"Apple's patents are “good quality”, but the better the patent's "
+"quality”—mistakes of the patent system, that is—it would "
+"not really change things. Whether 100,000 patents or 50,000, it's the same "
+"disaster. This is why it's a mistake to limit our criticism of software "
+"patents to just “patent trolls” or “bad quality” "
+"patents. The worst patent aggressor today is Apple, which isn't a "
+"“troll” by the usual definition; I don't know whether Apple's "
+"patents are “good quality”, but the better the patent's "
"“quality” the more dangerous its threat."
msgstr ""
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy/po limit-patent-effect.fr.po lim...,
GNUN <=