www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/licenses gpl-faq.fr.html license-list.fr.ht...

From: GNUN
Subject: www/licenses gpl-faq.fr.html license-list.fr.ht...
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:28:29 +0000 
CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     13/01/01 17:28:29

Modified files:
        licenses       : gpl-faq.fr.html license-list.fr.html 
                         license-list.it.html 
        licenses/po    : gpl-faq.fr-en.html license-list.fr-en.html 
                         license-list.it-en.html license-list.it.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/gpl-faq.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.83&r2=1.84
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/license-list.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.143&r2=1.144
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/license-list.it.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.49&r2=1.50
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/license-list.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.36&r2=1.37
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/license-list.it-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.32&r2=1.33
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/license-list.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.109&r2=1.110

Patches:
Index: gpl-faq.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/gpl-faq.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.83
retrieving revision 1.84
diff -u -b -r1.83 -r1.84
--- gpl-faq.fr.html     30 Dec 2012 12:58:48 -0000      1.83
+++ gpl-faq.fr.html     1 Jan 2013 17:28:27 -0000       1.84
@@ -569,6 +569,9 @@
 une classe qui est sous GPL sans la modifier, et que j'en hérite, dans
 quelle mesure la GPL affecte-t-elle le programme résultant ?</a></li>
   
+    <li><a href="#NonfreeDriverKernelLinux">Est-ce que de distribuer un pilote 
non
+libre destiné à se lier au noyau Linux viole la GPL ?</a></li>
+
     <li><a href="#LinkingOverControlledInterface">Comment puis-je autoriser la
 liaison de modules privateurs avec ma bibliothèque sous GPL uniquement dans
 une interface contrôlée ?</a></li>
@@ -1634,6 +1637,19 @@
 <p>Vous disposez toujours de l'alternative légale de ne pas utiliser notre
 code.</p></dd>
 
+<dt id="NonfreeDriverKernelLinux">Est-ce que de distribuer un pilote non libre 
destiné à se lier au noyau
+Linux viole la GPL ? <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a
+href="#NonfreeDriverKernelLinux">#NonfreeDriverKernelLinux</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd><p>
+Linux (le noyau du système d'exploitation GNU/Linux) est distribué sous la
+version 2 de la GPL. Est-ce que de distribuer un pilote non libre destiné à
+se lier à Linux viole la GPL ?</p>
+<p>Oui, c'est une violation, parce que cela crée de fait une combinaison plus
+étendue. Que l'utilisateur soit censé rassembler les morceaux ne change
+vraiment rien. </p>
+<p>Chaque contributeur de Linux qui détient un copyright sur une partie
+importante du code peut faire respecter la GPL ; nous encourageons chacun
+d'eux à agir contre ceux qui distribuent des pilotes non libres pour 
Linux.</p></dd>
 
 <dt id="LinkingOverControlledInterface">Comment puis-je autoriser la liaison 
de modules privateurs avec ma
 bibliothèque sous GPL uniquement dans une interface contrôlée ? <span
@@ -2386,9 +2402,9 @@
 (sous copyleft) et le code utilisateur (habituellement sous des termes
 incompatibles), comme indiqué dans le diagramme ci-dessous.</p>
 
-<!-- GNUN: localize URL /licenses/template-diagram.fr.png -->
+<!-- GNUN: localize URL /licenses/template-diagram.png -->
 <p><a href="template-diagram.png">
-<img src="/licenses/template-diagram.fr.png"
+<img src="/licenses/template-diagram.png"
      alt="Diagramme de modèle faisant appel à du JavaScript"/></a></p>
 
 <p>Voici une exception pour le code JavaScript qui fait cela :</p>
@@ -3756,7 +3772,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2012/12/30 12:58:48 $
+$Date: 2013/01/01 17:28:27 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: license-list.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/license-list.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.143
retrieving revision 1.144
diff -u -b -r1.143 -r1.144
--- license-list.fr.html        22 Dec 2012 12:57:19 -0000      1.143
+++ license-list.fr.html        1 Jan 2013 17:28:28 -0000       1.144
@@ -2060,8 +2060,15 @@
 <dt><a id="ODbl" href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:ODbl";> Open
 Database license</a> <span class="anchor-reference-id"> (<a
 href="#ODbl">#ODbl</a>)</span></dt>
-<dd><p>Il s'agit d'une licence libre avec copyleft destinée aux bases de
-données. Elle est incompatible avec la GNU GPL.</p></dd>
+
+<dd><p>C'est une licence libre avec copyleft, faite pour les données. Comme 
elle
+est incompatible avec la GPL et la FDL de GNU, il est préférable de ne pas
+l'employer pour des logiciels ni pour de la documentation. Elle a des
+exigences un peu compliquées, à savoir de signer des contrats qui
+s'efforcent de produire un effet similaire au copyleft sur des données qui
+ne peuvent pas être placées sous copyright ; c'est pourquoi nous ne
+recommandons pas son utilisation. Toutefois il n'y a aucune raison de ne pas
+se servir des données publiées de cette façon. </p></dd>
 
 </dl>
 
@@ -2220,7 +2227,7 @@
  <p><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2012/12/22 12:57:19 $
+$Date: 2013/01/01 17:28:28 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: license-list.it.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/license-list.it.html,v
retrieving revision 1.49
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -b -r1.49 -r1.50
--- license-list.it.html        20 Dec 2012 10:27:40 -0000      1.49
+++ license-list.it.html        1 Jan 2013 17:28:28 -0000       1.50
@@ -1972,8 +1972,13 @@
 <dt><a id="ODbl" href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:ODbl";> Open
 Database license</a> <span class="anchor-reference-id"> (<a
 href="#ODbl">#ODbl</a>)</span></dt>
-<dd><p>Questa è una licenza di software libero con copyleft, pensata per 
database;
-è incompatibile con la GNU GPL.</p></dd>
+
+<dd><p>Questa è una licenza libera con copyleft adatta a dati generici. 
&Egrave;
+incompatibile con la GNU GPL. Non utilizzatela per software o
+documentazione, poiché è incompatibile con la GNU GPL e la GNU FDL a causa
+di richieste sconvenienti sul dover firmare contratti che cercano di imporre
+qualcosa simile al copyleft su dati che non sono soggetti a diritto
+d'autore; ma è accettabile usare dati rilasciati sotto questa 
licenza.</p></dd>
 
 </dl>
 
@@ -2115,7 +2120,7 @@
  <p><!-- timestamp start -->
 Ultimo aggiornamento:
 
-$Date: 2012/12/20 10:27:40 $
+$Date: 2013/01/01 17:28:28 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/gpl-faq.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- po/gpl-faq.fr-en.html       30 Dec 2012 12:58:49 -0000      1.28
+++ po/gpl-faq.fr-en.html       1 Jan 2013 17:28:28 -0000       1.29
@@ -573,6 +573,10 @@
     if I use a class that is GPL'ed without modifying, and subclass it,
     in what way does the GPL affect the larger program?</a></li>
   
+    <li><a href="#NonfreeDriverKernelLinux">Does distributing a
+    nonfree driver meant to link with the kernel Linux violate the
+    GPL?</a></li>
+
     <li><a href="#LinkingOverControlledInterface">How can I allow
     linking of proprietary modules with my GPL-covered library under a
     controlled interface only?</a></li>
@@ -1644,6 +1648,19 @@
 
 <p>You always have the legal alternative of not using our code.</p></dd>
 
+<dt id="NonfreeDriverKernelLinux">Does distributing a nonfree driver
+   meant to link with the kernel Linux violate the GPL?
+   <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a 
href="#NonfreeDriverKernelLinux">#NonfreeDriverKernelLinux</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd><p>
+Linux (the kernel in the GNU/Linux operating system) is distributed
+under GNU GPL version 2.  Does distributing a nonfree driver meant to
+link with Linux violate the GPL?</p>
+<p>Yes, this is a violation, because effectively this makes a larger
+combined work. The fact that the user is expected to put the pieces
+together does not really change anything.</p>
+<p>Each contributor to Linux who holds copyright on a substantial part of
+the code can enforce the GPL and we encourage each of them to take
+action against those distributing nonfree Linux-drivers.</p></dd>
 
 <dt id="LinkingOverControlledInterface">How can I allow linking of
   proprietary modules with my GPL-covered library under a controlled
@@ -3585,7 +3602,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2012/12/30 12:58:49 $
+$Date: 2013/01/01 17:28:28 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/license-list.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/license-list.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.36
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -b -r1.36 -r1.37
--- po/license-list.fr-en.html  22 Dec 2012 12:57:19 -0000      1.36
+++ po/license-list.fr-en.html  1 Jan 2013 17:28:29 -0000       1.37
@@ -2089,8 +2089,14 @@
     Open Database license</a>
     <span class="anchor-reference-id">
        (<a href="#ODbl">#ODbl</a>)</span></dt>
-<dd><p>This is a free and copyleft license meant for databases. It is
-incompatible with the GNU GPL.</p></dd>
+
+<dd><p>This is a free and copyleft license meant for data.  It is
+incompatible with the GNU GPL. Please don't use it for software or
+documentation, since it is incompatible with the GNU GPL and with the
+GNU FDL. It makes inconvenient requirements about signing contracts
+which try to create an effect like copyleft for data that is not
+copyrightable, so we don't recommend using it; however, there is no
+reason to avoid using data released this way.</p></dd>
 
 </dl>
 
@@ -2222,7 +2228,7 @@
 
 <p>Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2012/12/22 12:57:19 $
+$Date: 2013/01/01 17:28:29 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/license-list.it-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/license-list.it-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.32
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -b -r1.32 -r1.33
--- po/license-list.it-en.html  20 Dec 2012 10:27:40 -0000      1.32
+++ po/license-list.it-en.html  1 Jan 2013 17:28:29 -0000       1.33
@@ -2089,8 +2089,14 @@
     Open Database license</a>
     <span class="anchor-reference-id">
        (<a href="#ODbl">#ODbl</a>)</span></dt>
-<dd><p>This is a free and copyleft license meant for databases. It is
-incompatible with the GNU GPL.</p></dd>
+
+<dd><p>This is a free and copyleft license meant for data.  It is
+incompatible with the GNU GPL. Please don't use it for software or
+documentation, since it is incompatible with the GNU GPL and with the
+GNU FDL. It makes inconvenient requirements about signing contracts
+which try to create an effect like copyleft for data that is not
+copyrightable, so we don't recommend using it; however, there is no
+reason to avoid using data released this way.</p></dd>
 
 </dl>
 
@@ -2222,7 +2228,7 @@
 
 <p>Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2012/12/20 10:27:40 $
+$Date: 2013/01/01 17:28:29 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/license-list.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/license-list.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.109
retrieving revision 1.110
diff -u -b -r1.109 -r1.110
--- po/license-list.it.po       1 Jan 2013 16:55:46 -0000       1.109
+++ po/license-list.it.po       1 Jan 2013 17:28:29 -0000       1.110
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-31 15:27-0500\n"
 
 # type: Content of: <title>
 #. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -4574,20 +4573,7 @@
 "\">#ODbl</a>)</span>"
 
 # type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-# | This is a free and copyleft license meant for [-general-] data.  {+It is
-# | incompatible with the GNU GPL.+} Please don't use it for software or
-# | documentation, since it is incompatible with the GNU GPL and with the GNU
-# | [-FDL;-] {+FDL. It makes inconvenient requirements about signing contracts
-# | which try to create an effect like copyleft for data that is not
-# | copyrightable, so we don't recommend using it;+} however, [-it-] {+there+}
-# | is [-fine-] {+no reason+} to [-use for other kinds of data.-] {+avoid
-# | using data released this way.+}
-#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "This is a free and copyleft license meant for general data.  Please don't "
-#| "use it for software or documentation, since it is incompatible with the "
-#| "GNU GPL and with the GNU FDL; however, it is fine to use for other kinds "
-#| "of data."
+#. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
 msgid ""
 "This is a free and copyleft license meant for data.  It is incompatible with "
 "the GNU GPL. Please don't use it for software or documentation, since it is "
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]