www/philosophy free-sw.it.html po/free-sw.it-en...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     12/07/02 16:27:19

Modified files:
        philosophy     : free-sw.it.html 
        philosophy/po  : free-sw.it-en.html free-sw.it.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.it.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.44&r2=1.45
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.it-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.87&r2=1.88

Patches:
Index: free-sw.it.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.it.html,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -b -r1.44 -r1.45
--- free-sw.it.html     24 Jun 2012 08:28:55 -0000      1.44
+++ free-sw.it.html     2 Jul 2012 16:26:55 -0000       1.45
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
 
 <p>
 Affinché le libertà 1 e 3 (libertà di fare modifiche e di pubblicare
-versioni migliorate) abbiano senso, si deve avere accesso al codice sorgente
+versioni modificate) abbiano senso, si deve avere accesso al codice sorgente
 del programma.  Perciò, l'accessibilità al codice sorgente è una condizione
 necessaria per il software libero. Il &ldquo;codice sorgente&rdquo;
 deliberatamente offuscato non è vero codice sorgente e non può essere
@@ -184,8 +184,9 @@
 
 <p>
 Se una modifica costituisca o meno un miglioramento è una questione
-soggettiva. Se le vostre modifiche sono limitate, in sostanza, a variazioni
-che qualcun altro considera miglioramenti, quella non è libertà .
+soggettiva. Se i vostri diritti di modificare un programma sono limitati, in
+sostanza, a variazioni che qualcun altro considera miglioramenti, quel
+programma non è libero.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -516,7 +517,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 Ultimo aggiornamento:
 
-$Date: 2012/06/24 08:28:55 $
+$Date: 2012/07/02 16:26:55 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/free-sw.it-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.it-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- po/free-sw.it-en.html       24 Jun 2012 08:29:09 -0000      1.8
+++ po/free-sw.it-en.html       2 Jul 2012 16:27:08 -0000       1.9
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
 
 <p>
 In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the
-freedom to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have
+freedom to publish the changed versions) to be meaningful, you must have
 access to the source code of the program.  Therefore, accessibility of
 source code is a necessary condition for free software.  Obfuscated
 &ldquo;source code&rdquo; is not real source code and does not count
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@
 
 <p>
 Whether a change constitutes an improvement is a subjective matter.
-If your modifications are limited, in substance, to changes that
-someone else considers an improvement, that is not freedom.
+If your right to modify a program is limited, in substance, to changes that
+someone else considers an improvement, that program is not free.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2012/06/24 08:29:09 $
+$Date: 2012/07/02 16:27:08 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/free-sw.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.87
retrieving revision 1.88
diff -u -b -r1.87 -r1.88
--- po/free-sw.it.po    2 Jul 2012 08:32:45 -0000       1.87
+++ po/free-sw.it.po    2 Jul 2012 16:27:08 -0000       1.88
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"Outdated-Since: 2012-07-01 12:25-0300\n"
 
 # type: Content of: <title>
 #. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -235,20 +234,7 @@
 "caso si trovi o si sviluppi un modo per farlo."
 
 # type: Content of: <p>
-# | In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
-# | to publish [-improved-] {+the changed+} versions) to be meaningful, you
-# | must have access to the source code of the program.  Therefore,
-# | accessibility of source code is a necessary condition for free software.
-# | Obfuscated &ldquo;source code&rdquo; is not real source code and does not
-# | count as source code.
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the "
-#| "freedom to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have "
-#| "access to the source code of the program.  Therefore, accessibility of "
-#| "source code is a necessary condition for free software.  Obfuscated "
-#| "&ldquo;source code&rdquo; is not real source code and does not count as "
-#| "source code."
+#. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
 "In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom "
 "to publish the changed versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to "
@@ -373,15 +359,7 @@
 "it.html\">venderne copie</a>."
 
 # type: Content of: <p>
-# | Whether a change constitutes an improvement is a subjective matter.  If
-# | your [-modifications are-] {+right to modify a program is+} limited, in
-# | substance, to changes that someone else considers an improvement, that
-# | {+program+} is not [-freedom.-] {+free.+}
-#. type: Content of: <p>
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Whether a change constitutes an improvement is a subjective matter.  If "
-#| "your modifications are limited, in substance, to changes that someone "
-#| "else considers an improvement, that is not freedom."
+#. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
 "Whether a change constitutes an improvement is a subjective matter.  If your "
 "right to modify a program is limited, in substance, to changes that someone "