[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy danger-of-software-patents.html
From: |
Jeanne Rasata |
Subject: |
www/philosophy danger-of-software-patents.html |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:09:29 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Jeanne Rasata <jrasata> 10/12/03 22:09:29
Modified files:
philosophy : danger-of-software-patents.html
Log message:
minor RMS-approved changes
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
Patches:
Index: danger-of-software-patents.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- danger-of-software-patents.html 3 Dec 2010 18:22:27 -0000 1.18
+++ danger-of-software-patents.html 3 Dec 2010 22:09:27 -0000 1.19
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@
those patents could prohibit your program, if those ideas are
patented.</p>
-<p>For instance, suppose there were graphical idea patents and you
+<p>For instance, suppose there were graphical-idea patents and you
wanted to draw a square. Well, you would realize that if there was a
patent on a bottom edge, it would prohibit your square. You could put
“bottom edge” on the list of all ideas implemented in your
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
paper copy of this patent and xeroxed it and sent it to him. And when
he got it, he said, “I think you sent me the wrong patent. This
is something about compilers.” So I thought maybe our file has
-the wrong number in it. I looked in it again, and sure enough it said
+the wrong number in it. I looked in it again, and sure enough it said,
“A method for compiling formulas into object code.” So I
started to read it to see if it was indeed the wrong patent. I read
the claims, and sure enough it was the natural order recalculation
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@
<p>In fact, I once gave this speech and Heckel was in the audience.
And at this point he jumped up and said, “That's not true, I
-just didn't know the scope of my protection.” And I said
+just didn't know the scope of my protection.” And I said,
“Yeah, that's what I said,” at which point he sat down and
that was the end of my experience being heckled by Heckel. If I had
said no, he probably would have found a way to argue with me.</p>
@@ -1430,7 +1430,7 @@
<p>Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/12/03 18:22:27 $
+$Date: 2010/12/03 22:09:27 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>