[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/gnu thegnuproject.html
From: |
Jeanne Rasata |
Subject: |
www/gnu thegnuproject.html |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:31:50 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Jeanne Rasata <jrasata> 10/11/12 20:31:50
Modified files:
gnu : thegnuproject.html
Log message:
added missing words (RMS-approved)
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/gnu/thegnuproject.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.56&r2=1.57
Patches:
Index: thegnuproject.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/gnu/thegnuproject.html,v
retrieving revision 1.56
retrieving revision 1.57
diff -u -b -r1.56 -r1.57
--- thegnuproject.html 12 Nov 2010 18:35:50 -0000 1.56
+++ thegnuproject.html 12 Nov 2010 20:31:48 -0000 1.57
@@ -83,15 +83,16 @@
share with your neighbor, you are a pirate. If you want any changes,
beg us to make them.”</p>
<p>
-The idea that the proprietary software social system—the system that
-says you are not allowed to share or change software—is antisocial,
-that it is unethical, that it is simply wrong, may come as a surprise
-to some readers. But what else could we say about a system based on
-dividing the public and keeping users helpless? Readers who find the
-idea surprising may have taken proprietary software social system as
-given, or judged it on the terms suggested by proprietary software
-businesses. Software publishers have worked long and hard to convince
-people that there is only one way to look at the issue.</p>
+The idea that the proprietary software social system—the system
+that says you are not allowed to share or change software—is
+antisocial, that it is unethical, that it is simply wrong, may come as
+a surprise to some readers. But what else could we say about a system
+based on dividing the public and keeping users helpless? Readers who
+find the idea surprising may have taken the proprietary software
+social system as a given, or judged it on the terms suggested by
+proprietary software businesses. Software publishers have worked long
+and hard to convince people that there is only one way to look at the
+issue.</p>
<p>
When software publishers talk about “enforcing” their
“rights” or “stopping <a
href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy">piracy</a>”, what they
@@ -1026,7 +1027,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/11/12 18:35:50 $
+$Date: 2010/11/12 20:31:48 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>