www/philosophy microsoft-new-monopoly.html

[Richard M. Stallman]

CVSROOT:        /webcvs/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Richard M. Stallman <rms>       10/06/24 16:40:46

Modified files:
        philosophy     : microsoft-new-monopoly.html 

Log message:
        Clarify note at beginning; move date from title into note.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.19&r2=1.20

Patches:
Index: microsoft-new-monopoly.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.html,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -b -r1.19 -r1.20
--- microsoft-new-monopoly.html 15 Dec 2009 15:10:50 -0000      1.19
+++ microsoft-new-monopoly.html 24 Jun 2010 16:40:02 -0000      1.20
@@ -4,13 +4,14 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
    
-<h2>Microsoft's New Monopoly (July 2005)</h2>
+<h2>Microsoft's New Monopoly</h2>
 
 <p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";><strong>Richard 
Stallman</strong></a></p>
 
-<i>Note: Microsoft adopted a different policy in 2006, so the
-details discussed on this page are now only of historical significance.
-That doesn't mean, however, that the patent problem for OOXML is gone.
+<i>This article was written in July 2005.  Microsoft adopted a
+different policy in 2006, so the specific policies and criticisms on
+this page are only of historical significance.  The overall problem
+remains:
 <a 
href="http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections#Patent_rights_to_implement_the_Ecma_376_specification_have_not_been_granted";>
 Microsoft's cunningly worded new policy does not give anyone clear
 permission to implement OOXML.</a>
@@ -165,7 +166,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2009/12/15 15:10:50 $
+$Date: 2010/06/24 16:40:02 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>