www/help/po evaluation.pot

[Yavor Doganov]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Yavor Doganov <yavor>   10/05/09 20:25:44

Modified files:
        help/po        : evaluation.pot 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/help/po/evaluation.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7

Patches:
Index: evaluation.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/help/po/evaluation.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- evaluation.pot      3 May 2010 20:26:18 -0000       1.6
+++ evaluation.pot      9 May 2010 20:25:40 -0000       1.7
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-05-03 16:26-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2010-05-09 16:25-0300\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
 "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
 "   If your program is accepted to be part of the GNU system, it means\n"
 "   that you become a GNU maintainer, which in turn means that you will\n"
 "   need to follow GNU policies in regards to that GNU program.\n"
-"   (Summarized below, see maintainers document for full descriptions.)\n"
+"   (Summarized above, see maintainers document for full descriptions.)\n"
 "\n"
 "** Package name and version:\n"
 "\n"
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@
 "\n"
 "** URL to source tarball:\n"
 "    Please make a release tarball for purposes of evaluation, whether\n"
-"    or not you don'want to publicly release it.  If you don't have\n"
+"    or not you publicly release it.  If you don't have\n"
 "    anywhere to upload it, send it as an attachment.\n"
 "\n"
 "** Brief description of the package:\n"
@@ -263,8 +263,8 @@
 "** Configuration, building, installation:\n"
 "    It might or might not use Autoconf/Automake, but it must meet GNU\n"
 "    standards.  Even packages that do not require compilation\n"
-"    should follow these standards, so installers have a uniform way to\n"
-"    set installation directories, etc.  Please see:\n"
+"    must follow these standards, so installers have a uniform way to\n"
+"    define target directories, etc.  Please see:\n"
 "    http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Configuration.html\n";
 "    http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Makefile-Conventions.html\n";
 "\n"
@@ -278,7 +278,10 @@
 "* Licensing:\n"
 "   This is crucial.  Both the software itself *and all dependencies*\n"
 "   (third-party libraries, etc.) must be free software in order to be\n"
-"   included in GNU.  Documentation should be under the GFDL.\n"
+"   included in GNU.  In general, GNU software should be released\n"
+"   under the GNU GPL version 3 or any later version, and\n"
+"   GNU documentation should be released under the\n"
+"   GNU FDL version 1.3 or any later version.\n"
 "\n"
 "   Please see http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html for a\n"
 "   practical guide to which licenses are free (for GNU's purposes) and\n"
@@ -304,49 +307,6 @@
 msgstr ""
 
 # type: Content of: <h3>
-msgid "Helping evaluate software for GNU"
-msgstr ""
-
-# type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"From time to time (but not at the moment), we can use additional volunteers "
-"to commit to helping evaluate the software we are offered through the "
-"procedures above.  Timeliness is of the utmost importance in doing an "
-"evaluation.  The main goal of doing the evaluations is not to be an expert "
-"in the field (a common misconception), but to get a general understanding of "
-"the program on the one hand, and how it meets certain very specific criteria "
-"on the other (we use a standard form to guide evaluations)."
-msgstr ""
-
-# type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"It is also not critical to be a systems expert.  Many packages are offered "
-"in a state that is too difficult to compile, let alone run.  This does not "
-"mean the evaluation cannot be completed! Considering the overall goal of the "
-"package, plus looking at the source code, is nearly always enough to do a "
-"useful evaluation.  In general, it is neither necessary nor desirable to "
-"examine the minutiae of a given program; this tends to stall the evaluation "
-"endlessly."
-msgstr ""
-
-# type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Doing evaluations is generally a very educational experience.  Evaluators "
-"often learn about (usually) interesting projects which would never otherwise "
-"cross their path, as well gaining familiarity with GNU guidelines and Free "
-"Software in general.  It helps the GNU Project and the Free Software "
-"Foundation as well."
-msgstr ""
-
-# type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"If you are interested in helping with this task for GNU, please email <a "
-"href=\"mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>, "
-"which will reach the coordinators of the group of volunteers that does "
-"evaluations."
-msgstr ""
-
-# type: Content of: <h3>
 msgid "Other ways to help the GNU Project"
 msgstr ""