www/philosophy microsoft.ar.html microsoft.ca.h...

[Yavor Doganov]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Yavor Doganov <yavor>   10/05/04 08:25:54

Modified files:
        philosophy     : microsoft.ar.html microsoft.ca.html 
                         microsoft.fr.html microsoft.ml.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft.ar.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft.ca.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft.ml.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6

Patches:
Index: microsoft.ar.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft.ar.html,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- microsoft.ar.html   26 Oct 2009 08:26:46 -0000      1.6
+++ microsoft.ar.html   4 May 2010 08:25:51 -0000       1.7
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@
 that it may try to slip into your browser.)  When Microsoft releases free
 programs, which it occasionally does, they are acceptable in theory; but
 most of them depend fundamentally on Microsoft proprietary software, which
-we do need to reject, and that makes them useless for those of us that want
-to maintain our freedom.</p>
+we do need to reject, and that makes them useless for anyone that chooses to
+live in freedom.</p>
 
 <p>In the &ldquo;Halloween documents&rdquo;, leaked in October 1998, Microsoft
 executives stated an intention to use various methods to obstruct the
@@ -74,7 +74,10 @@
 software are the ones designed to build up social inertia that obstructs
 migration to GNU/Linux.  For instance, when Microsoft &ldquo;donates&rdquo;
 copies of Windows to schools, it converts these schools into tools for
-implanting a dependence on Windows.</p>
+implanting a dependence on Windows.  There are indications that Microsoft
+systematically plans these activities <a
+href="http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/EDGI";> as a campaign against
+the adoption of GNU/Linux</a>.</p>
 
 <p>Each Windows &ldquo;upgrade&rdquo; augments Microsoft's power over the
 users; Microsoft plans it that way.  And each one is a step forward in
@@ -129,7 +132,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 حُدّثت:
 
-$Date: 2009/10/26 08:26:46 $
+$Date: 2010/05/04 08:25:51 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: microsoft.ca.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft.ca.html,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -b -r1.9 -r1.10
--- microsoft.ca.html   26 Oct 2009 08:26:46 -0000      1.9
+++ microsoft.ca.html   4 May 2010 08:25:51 -0000       1.10
@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@
 that it may try to slip into your browser.)  When Microsoft releases free
 programs, which it occasionally does, they are acceptable in theory; but
 most of them depend fundamentally on Microsoft proprietary software, which
-we do need to reject, and that makes them useless for those of us that want
-to maintain our freedom.</p>
+we do need to reject, and that makes them useless for anyone that chooses to
+live in freedom.</p>
 
 <p>In the &ldquo;Halloween documents&rdquo;, leaked in October 1998, Microsoft
 executives stated an intention to use various methods to obstruct the
@@ -73,7 +73,10 @@
 software are the ones designed to build up social inertia that obstructs
 migration to GNU/Linux.  For instance, when Microsoft &ldquo;donates&rdquo;
 copies of Windows to schools, it converts these schools into tools for
-implanting a dependence on Windows.</p>
+implanting a dependence on Windows.  There are indications that Microsoft
+systematically plans these activities <a
+href="http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/EDGI";> as a campaign against
+the adoption of GNU/Linux</a>.</p>
 
 <p>Each Windows &ldquo;upgrade&rdquo; augments Microsoft's power over the
 users; Microsoft plans it that way.  And each one is a step forward in
@@ -129,7 +132,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 Updated:
 
-$Date: 2009/10/26 08:26:46 $
+$Date: 2010/05/04 08:25:51 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: microsoft.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- microsoft.fr.html   29 Nov 2009 21:26:39 -0000      1.21
+++ microsoft.fr.html   4 May 2010 08:25:51 -0000       1.22
@@ -45,16 +45,15 @@
 les logiciels propriétaires, peu importe qui les a développés ou les
 distribue.</p>
 
-<p>Il n'est pas nécessaire de rejeter les produits non-logiciels ou les
-services de Microsoft que vous pouvez utiliser sans logiciel
-propriétaire. (Quand vous utilisez un service Web, qu'il soit de Microsoft
-ou pas, faites attention aux <a
-href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html">programmes JavaScript non-libres</a>
-qu'il pourrait essayer de glisser dans votre navigateur). Quand Microsoft
-publie des programmes libres, ce qu'il fait parfois, ils sont acceptables en
-théorie&nbsp;; mais la plupart d'entre eux dépendent fondamentalement de
-logiciels propriétaires de Microsoft, que nous devons rejeter, et cela les
-rend inutiles pour ceux d'entre nous qui veulent conserver notre liberté.</p>
+<p>There is no need to reject Microsoft non-software products, or services that
+you can use without proprietary software.  (When you use a web service,
+whether Microsoft's or not, watch out for <a
+href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html">non-free JavaScript programs</a>
+that it may try to slip into your browser.)  When Microsoft releases free
+programs, which it occasionally does, they are acceptable in theory; but
+most of them depend fundamentally on Microsoft proprietary software, which
+we do need to reject, and that makes them useless for anyone that chooses to
+live in freedom.</p>
 
 <p>Dans les &laquo;&nbsp;documents Halloween&nbsp;&raquo;, diffus&eacute;s
 &agrave; la fin du mois d'octobre 1998, les cadres de Microsoft
@@ -83,11 +82,14 @@
 href="http://endsoftpatents.org/";>éliminer les brevets logiciels</a>.
 </p>
 
-<p>D'autres pratiques particulièrement dommageables de Microsoft pour
-l'adoption des logiciels libres sont celles conçues pour favoriser une
-inertie sociale qui empêche la migration vers GNU/Linux. Par exemple, quand
-Microsoft «&nbsp;donne&nbsp;» des copies de Windows aux écoles, il convertit
-ces écoles en outil pour une implantation de la dépendance à Windows.</p>
+<p>Other Microsoft practices specifically harmful to the adoption of free
+software are the ones designed to build up social inertia that obstructs
+migration to GNU/Linux.  For instance, when Microsoft &ldquo;donates&rdquo;
+copies of Windows to schools, it converts these schools into tools for
+implanting a dependence on Windows.  There are indications that Microsoft
+systematically plans these activities <a
+href="http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/EDGI";> as a campaign against
+the adoption of GNU/Linux</a>.</p>
 
 <p>Chaque «&nbsp;mise à jour&nbsp;» de Windows augmente le pouvoir de 
Microsoft
 sur les utilisateurs&nbsp;; Microsoft le planifie ainsi. Et chacune d'elle
@@ -145,7 +147,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour&nbsp;:
 
-$Date: 2009/11/29 21:26:39 $
+$Date: 2010/05/04 08:25:51 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: microsoft.ml.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft.ml.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- microsoft.ml.html   26 Oct 2009 08:26:46 -0000      1.5
+++ microsoft.ml.html   4 May 2010 08:25:51 -0000       1.6
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@
 that it may try to slip into your browser.)  When Microsoft releases free
 programs, which it occasionally does, they are acceptable in theory; but
 most of them depend fundamentally on Microsoft proprietary software, which
-we do need to reject, and that makes them useless for those of us that want
-to maintain our freedom.</p>
+we do need to reject, and that makes them useless for anyone that chooses to
+live in freedom.</p>
 
 <p>In the &ldquo;Halloween documents&rdquo;, leaked in October 1998, Microsoft
 executives stated an intention to use various methods to obstruct the
@@ -74,7 +74,10 @@
 software are the ones designed to build up social inertia that obstructs
 migration to GNU/Linux.  For instance, when Microsoft &ldquo;donates&rdquo;
 copies of Windows to schools, it converts these schools into tools for
-implanting a dependence on Windows.</p>
+implanting a dependence on Windows.  There are indications that Microsoft
+systematically plans these activities <a
+href="http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/EDGI";> as a campaign against
+the adoption of GNU/Linux</a>.</p>
 
 <p>Each Windows &ldquo;upgrade&rdquo; augments Microsoft's power over the
 users; Microsoft plans it that way.  And each one is a step forward in
@@ -128,7 +131,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 പുതുക്കിയതു്:
 
-$Date: 2009/10/26 08:26:46 $
+$Date: 2010/05/04 08:25:51 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>