www/philosophy free-sw.af.html free-sw.ar.html ...

www-commits
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy free-sw.af.html free-sw.ar.html ...

From:	Yavor Doganov
Subject:	www/philosophy free-sw.af.html free-sw.ar.html ...
Date:	Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:26:00 +0000
CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Yavor Doganov <yavor>   10/01/29 09:26:00

Modified files:
        philosophy     : free-sw.af.html free-sw.ar.html free-sw.bg.html 
                         free-sw.fr.html free-sw.sk.html free-sw.sr.html 
                         free-sw.tr.html x.fr.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.af.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.14&r2=1.15
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.ar.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.20&r2=1.21
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.bg.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.23&r2=1.24
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.57&r2=1.58
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.sk.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.sr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.tr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.23&r2=1.24
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/x.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.10&r2=1.11

Patches:
Index: free-sw.af.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.af.html,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -b -r1.14 -r1.15
--- free-sw.af.html     26 Nov 2009 09:26:09 -0000      1.14
+++ free-sw.af.html     29 Jan 2010 09:25:51 -0000      1.15
@@ -44,19 +44,20 @@
   <li>Die vryheid om kopie&euml; te herversprei sodat jy jou naaste kan help
 (vryheid 2).
   </li>
-  <li>The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements (and
-modified versions in general)  to the public, so that the whole community
-benefits (freedom 3).  Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
+  <li>The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others
+(freedom 3).  By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to
+benefit from your changes.  Access to the source code is a precondition for
+this.
   </li>
 </ul>
 
 <p>
-'n Program is vrye sagteware as gebruikers al hierdie vryhede geniet.  Dus
-behoort dit jou vry te staan om kopie&euml; te herversprei, hetsy met of
-sonder veranderinge, hetsy gratis of deur 'n verspreidingsfooi te vra, vir
-<a href="#exportcontrol">enigeen op enige plek</a>.&nbsp; Om vry te wees om
-hierdie dinge te doen beteken (onder andere) dat jy nie vir toestemming hoef
-te vra of te betaal nie.
+A program is free software if users have all of these freedoms.  Thus, you
+should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without modifications,
+either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to <a
+href="#exportcontrol">anyone anywhere</a>.  Being free to do these things
+means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission
+to do so.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -69,33 +70,31 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Die vryheid om 'n program te hardloop beteken dat enige soort persoon of
-organisasie vry is om dit op enige soort rekenaarstelsel te gebruik vir
-enige soort werk of doeleinde, sonder dat daar vereis word om dit an die
-ontwikkelaar of enige besondere instansie tekommunikeer.  Met hierdie
-vryheid is die gebruiker se doelwit belangriker, nie die ontwikkelaar s'n
-nie; jy as 'n gebruiker is vry om 'n program te gebruik vir jou doeleindes
-en as jy dit aan iemand anders versprei, is daardie persoon dan vry om dit
-vir sy eie doeleindes te gebruik en is jy nie geregtig om beperkinge op
-daardie persoon tel&ecirc; nie.
+The freedom to run the program means the freedom for any kind of person or
+organization to use it on any kind of computer system, for any kind of
+overall job and purpose, without being required to communicate about it with
+the developer or any other specific entity.  In this freedom, it is the
+<em>user's</em> purpose that matters, not the <em>developer's</em> purpose;
+you as a user are free to run the program for your purposes, and if you
+distribute it to someone else, she is then free to run it for her purposes,
+but you are not entitled to impose your purposes on her.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Die vryheid om kopie&euml; te herversprei moet bin&ecirc;re of uitvoerbare
-vorms van die program, asook die bronkode insluit vir beidie onveranderde en
-veranderde weergawes.&nbsp; (Die verspreiding van programme in uitvoerbare
-vorm is nodig vir gerief van installasie op vrye bedryfstelsels)&nbsp; Dit
-is aanvaarbaar as daar geen manier is om 'n bin&ecirc;re of uitvoerbare vorm
-van 'n sekere program te skep nie (aangesien sekere tale hierdie kenmerk nie
-ondersteun nie), maar jy behoort die vryheid te h&ecirc; om sulke vorme te
-versprei as jy 'n manier vind of ontwikkel om dit te kan maak.
+The freedom to redistribute copies must include binary or executable forms
+of the program, as well as source code, for both modified and unmodified
+versions.  (Distributing programs in runnable form is necessary for
+conveniently installable free operating systems.)  It is OK if there is no
+way to produce a binary or executable form for a certain program (since some
+languages don't support that feature), but you must have the freedom to
+redistribute such forms should you find or develop a way to make them.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Ten einde die vryheid om veranderinge te maak en verbeterde weergawes te
-implementeer, betekenisvol te maak, moet jy toegang tot die bronkode van die
-program h&ecirc;.  Daarom is toegang tot die bronkode 'n voorvereiste vir
-vrye sagteware.
+In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
+to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
+source code of the program.  Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
+necessary condition for free software.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -112,9 +111,18 @@
 <p>
 One important way to modify a program is by merging in available free
 subroutines and modules.  If the program's license says that you cannot
-merge in a suitably-licensed existing module, such as if it requires you to
-be the copyright holder of any code you add, then the license is too
-restrictive to qualify as free.
+merge in a suitably licensed existing module &mdash; for instance, if it
+requires you to be the copyright holder of any code you add &mdash; then the
+license is too restrictive to qualify as free.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Freedom 3 includes the freedom to use release your modified versions as free
+software.  A free license may also permit other ways of releasing them; in
+other words, it does not have to be a <a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> license.  However, a license
+that requires modified versions to be nonfree does not qualify as a free
+license.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -135,8 +143,8 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>non-commercial.</q> A free program
-must be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
+<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
+be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
 distribution.  Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
 such free commercial software is very important.  You may have paid money to
 get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
@@ -160,9 +168,9 @@
 such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
 at all.)  Rules that require release of source code to the users for
 versions that you put into public use are also acceptable.  It is also
-acceptable for the license to require that, if you have distributed a
-modified version and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must
-send one, or that you identify yourself on your modifications.
+acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
+as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
+developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -171,7 +179,7 @@
 legally for everyone.  But <a
 href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
 free software</a> also exists.  We believe there are important reasons why
-<a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html"> it is better to use copyleft</a>, but
+<a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html">it is better to use copyleft</a>, but
 if your program is non-copylefted free software, it is still basically
 ethical.
 </p>
@@ -196,35 +204,32 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Die meeste vrye sagteware lisensies is gebaseer op kopiereg en daar bestaan
-beperkinge op watter soorte vereistes deur middel van kopiereg opgel&ecirc;
-kan word.  As 'n kopiereggebaseerde lisensie vryheid op bostaande wyse
-beskryf respekteer is dit onwaarskynlik dat daar die een of ander probleem
-sou opduik wat nie voorsien kon word nie (alhoewel dit van tyd tot tyd wel
-gebeur).  Sommige vrye sagteware lisensies is egter gebaseer op kontrakte en
-kontrakte kan 'n baie weier reeks beperkinge oplÃª.  Dit beteken dat daar
-baie moontlike maniere is waarop so 'n lisensie onaanvaarbaar beperkend en
-nie-vry kan wees nie.
+Most free software licenses are based on copyright, and there are limits on
+what kinds of requirements can be imposed through copyright.  If a
+copyright-based license respects freedom in the ways described above, it is
+unlikely to have some other sort of problem that we never anticipated
+(though this does happen occasionally).  However, some free software
+licenses are based on contracts, and contracts can impose a much larger
+range of possible restrictions.  That means there are many possible ways
+such a license could be unacceptably restrictive and nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Dit is onmoontlik om al die maniere te lys waarop dit moontlik kan gebeur.
-As 'n kontrakgebaseerde lisensie 'n gebruiker op 'n ongewone wyse beperk wat
-nie moontlik is met lisensies wat op kopiereg gegrond is nie en wat nie hier
-as aanvaarbaar gelys word nie, sal dit waarskynlik oorweeg moet word en in
-alle waarskynlikheid nie aanvaar word as vrye sagteware nie.
+We can't possibly list all the ways that might happen.  If a contract-based
+license restricts the user in an unusual way that copyright-based licenses
+cannot, and which isn't mentioned here as legitimate, we will have to think
+about it, and we will probably conclude it is nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Wanneer daar oor vrye sagteware gepraat word is dit beter om begrippe soos
-"weggee" of "gratis" te gebruik omadt daardie begrippe impliseer dat dit oor
-prys alleen gaan en nie vryheid nie.&nbsp; Sommige algemene begrippe soos
-kopieregskending (piracy) sluit opinies in wat ons hoop u nie ondersteun
-nie.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html";>Sien
-verwarrende woorde en frases wat vermy moet word</a> vir 'n bespreking oor
-hierdie begrippe.&nbsp; Daar is ook 'n lys van <a
-href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/fs-translations.html";>vertalings van vry
-sagteware</a> in verskeie tale.
+When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
+<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
+issue is about price, not freedom.  Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
+embody opinions we hope you won't endorse.  See <a
+href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
+Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms.  We also have a list of
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
+software</q></a> into various languages.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -253,17 +258,17 @@
 </p> 
 
 <p>
-As u oorweeg om 'n nuwe lisensie te skryf, kontak asseblief die Vrye
-sagtewarestigting (FSF) by die bogenoemde adres.  Die vervuiling van
-sagteware lisensies beteken dat daar van gebruikers meer werk geverg word om
-hierdie lisensies te verstaan; ons mag kan help om 'n bestaande sagteware
-lisensie te vind wat aan u behoeftes voldoen.
+If you are contemplating writing a new license, please contact the Free
+Software Foundation first by writing to that address. The proliferation of
+different free software licenses means increased work for users in
+understanding the licenses; we may be able to help you find an existing free
+software license that meets your needs.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-As dit nie moontlik is nie en u regtig 'n nuwe lisensie benodig, kan ons u
-help om te verseker dat die lisensie werklik 'n Vrye Sagteware lisensie is
-en sodoende verskeie praktiese probleme vermy.
+If that isn't possible, if you really need a new license, with our help you
+can ensure that the license really is a free software license and avoid
+various practical problems.
 </p>
 
 <h2 id="beyond-software">Verder as Sagteware</h2>
@@ -307,6 +312,17 @@
 <ul>
 
 <li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.89&amp;r2=1.90";>Version
+1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
+your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
+else's development project.</li>
+
+<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.88&amp;r2=1.89";>Version
+1.89</a>: Freedom 3 includes the right to release modified versions as free
+software.</li>
+
+<li><a
 
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.79&amp;r2=1.80";>Version
 1.80</a>: Freedom 1 must be practical, not just theoretical; i.e., no
 tivoization.</li>
@@ -426,7 +442,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 Opgedateer:
 
-$Date: 2009/11/26 09:26:09 $
+$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:51 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: free-sw.ar.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.ar.html,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -b -r1.20 -r1.21
--- free-sw.ar.html     27 Oct 2009 20:26:13 -0000      1.20
+++ free-sw.ar.html     29 Jan 2010 09:25:51 -0000      1.21
@@ -42,16 +42,20 @@
   </li>
   <li>ØØ±ÙØ© Ø¥Ø¹Ø§Ø¯Ø© ØªÙØ²ÙØ¹ ÙØ³Ø® ÙØ¹ÙØ¯ÙØ§ Ø³ØªØªÙÙÙ ÙÙ Ù
Ø³Ø§Ø¹Ø¯Ø© Ø¬Ø§Ø±Ù (ØØ±ÙØ© 2).
   </li>
-  <li>ØØ±ÙØ© ØªØØ³ÙÙ Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬Ø ÙØ¥ØµØ¯Ø§Ø± ØªØØ³ÙÙØ§ØªÙ 
(ÙØ§ÙÙØ³Ø® Ø§ÙÙØ¹Ø¯ÙØ© Ø¨Ø´ÙÙ Ø¹Ø§Ù) ÙÙØ¹Ø§ÙØ©Ø
-ÙØ¹ÙØ¯ÙØ§ ÙØ³ØªÙÙØ¯ Ø§ÙÙØ¬ØªÙØ¹ ÙÙÙ (Ø§ÙØØ±ÙØ© 3). Ø§ÙÙØµÙÙ 
Ø¥ÙÙ Ø§ÙØ´ÙÙØ±Ø© Ø§ÙÙØµØ¯Ø±ÙØ© ÙØ§Ø²Ù ÙÙØ°Ø§.
+  <li>The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others
+(freedom 3).  By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to
+benefit from your changes.  Access to the source code is a precondition for
+this.
   </li>
 </ul>
 
 <p>
-ÙØµØ¨Ø Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬ ØØ±Ø§ Ø¥Ø°Ø§ Ø§ÙØªÙÙ ÙØ³ØªØ®Ø¯ÙÙÙ ÙÙ 
ÙØ°Ù Ø§ÙØØ±ÙØ§Øª. ÙØ°ÙÙØ ÙØ¬Ø¨ Ø£Ù ØªÙÙÙ ØØ±Ø§
-ÙÙ Ø¥Ø¹Ø§Ø¯Ø© ØªÙØ²ÙØ¹ ÙØ³Ø®Ø Ø³ÙØ§Ø¡Ù ÙØ¹ Ø£Ù Ø¨Ø¯ÙÙ 
ØªØ¹Ø¯ÙÙØ§ØªØ Ø³ÙØ§Ø¡Ù ÙØ¬Ø§ÙØ§ Ø£Ù Ø¨ÙÙØ§Ø¨Ù Ø£Ø¬Ø±
-ÙÙØªÙØ²ÙØ¹Ø <a href="#exportcontrol">ÙØ£Ù Ø´Ø®Øµ ÙÙ Ø£Ù Ù
ÙØ§Ù</a>. ÙÙÙÙ ØØ±Ø§ ÙÙØ¹Ù ÙØ°Ù
-Ø§ÙØ£Ø´ÙØ§Ø¡ ÙØ¹ÙÙ Ø¶ÙÙ ÙØ§ ÙØ¹ÙÙÙ Ø£ÙÙ ÙØ§ ØªØ·Ø§ÙØ¨ 
Ø¨Ø§ÙØ¯ÙØ¹ ÙØ£Ø¬Ù Ø§ÙØ¥Ø°Ù.
+A program is free software if users have all of these freedoms.  Thus, you
+should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without modifications,
+either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to <a
+href="#exportcontrol">anyone anywhere</a>.  Being free to do these things
+means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission
+to do so.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -61,26 +65,31 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ØØ±ÙØ© ØªØ´ØºÙÙ Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬ ØªØ¹ÙÙ ØØ±ÙØ© Ø£Ù Ø¥ÙØ³Ø§Ù Ø£Ù Ù
ÙØ¸ÙØ© ÙÙ Ø§Ø³ØªØ®Ø¯Ø§ÙÙ Ø¹ÙÙ Ø£Ù ÙØ¸Ø§Ù
-ØØ§Ø³ÙØ¨Ø ÙØ£Ù ÙÙØ¹ ÙÙ Ø§ÙÙÙÙØ§Øª ÙØ§ÙØ£ØºØ±Ø§Ø¶ Ø¨Ø¯ÙÙ Ø£Ù 
ÙÙÙÙ ÙØ·Ø§ÙØ¨Ø§ Ø¨Ø§ÙØ¥ÙØ´Ø§Ø¡ Ø¹ÙÙ ÙÙÙØ·ÙØ±
-Ø£Ù ÙØ£Ù ÙÙØ§Ù Ø¢Ø®Ø±. ÙÙ ÙØ°Ù Ø§ÙØØ±ÙØ©Ø ØºØ±Ø¶ <em>Ø§ÙÙ
Ø³ØªØ®Ø¯Ù</em> ÙÙ Ø§ÙÙÙÙØ ÙÙÙØ³ ØºØ±Ø¶
-<em>Ø§ÙÙØ·ÙØ±</em>Ø Ø£ÙØª ÙÙØ³ØªØ®Ø¯Ù ØØ± ÙÙ ØªØ´ØºÙÙ 
Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬ ÙØ£Ù ØºØ±Ø¶Ø ÙØ¥Ø°Ø§ ÙØ²ÙØ¹ØªÙ Ø¥ÙÙ
-Ø£Ù Ø´Ø®Øµ Ø¢Ø®Ø±Ø ÙÙ ØØ± ØÙÙØ¦Ø° Ø¨ØªØ´ØºÙÙÙ ÙØ£ØºØ±Ø§Ø¶ÙØ 
ÙÙÙÙÙ ØºÙØ± ÙÙØ®ÙÙ Ø¨ÙØ±Ø¶ Ø£ØºØ±Ø§Ø¶Ù Ø¹ÙÙÙ.
+The freedom to run the program means the freedom for any kind of person or
+organization to use it on any kind of computer system, for any kind of
+overall job and purpose, without being required to communicate about it with
+the developer or any other specific entity.  In this freedom, it is the
+<em>user's</em> purpose that matters, not the <em>developer's</em> purpose;
+you as a user are free to run the program for your purposes, and if you
+distribute it to someone else, she is then free to run it for her purposes,
+but you are not entitled to impose your purposes on her.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ØØ±ÙØ© Ø¥Ø¹Ø§Ø¯Ø© ØªÙØ²ÙØ¹ Ø§ÙÙØ³Ø® ÙØ¬Ø¨ Ø£Ù ØªØªØ¶ÙÙ 
Ø§ÙÙÙØ¦ØªÙÙ Ø§ÙØ«ÙØ§Ø¦ÙØ© Ø£Ù Ø§ÙØªØ´ØºÙÙÙØ© ÙÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬Ø
-Ø¨Ø§ÙØ¥Ø¶Ø§ÙØ© Ø¥ÙÙ Ø§ÙÙÙØ¯ Ø§ÙÙØµØ¯Ø±ÙØ ÙÙÙØ§ 
Ø§ÙØ¥ØµØ¯Ø§Ø±ÙÙ Ø§ÙÙØ¹Ø¯Ù ÙØºÙØ± Ø§ÙÙØ¹Ø¯Ù. (ØªÙØ²ÙØ¹
-Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬ Ø¨ØµÙØºØ© ÙØ§Ø¨ÙØ© ÙÙØªØ´ØºÙÙ Ø¶Ø±ÙØ±Ù ÙÙÙØ§Ø¦Ù
Ø© Ø£ÙØ¸ÙØ© Ø§ÙØªØ´ØºÙÙ Ø§ÙØØ±Ø© Ø§ÙÙØ§Ø¨ÙØ©
-ÙÙØªØ«Ø¨ÙØª.) ÙØ§ ÙØ´ÙÙØ© Ø¥Ø°Ø§ ÙÙ ØªÙØ¬Ø¯ Ø·Ø±ÙÙØ© ÙØªÙÙÙØ¯ 
ÙÙØ¦Ø© Ø«ÙØ§Ø¦ÙØ© Ø£Ù ÙØ§Ø¨ÙØ© ÙÙØªØ´ØºÙÙ
-ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬ ÙØ¹ÙÙ (Ø¨Ø¹Ø¶ Ø§ÙÙØºØ§Øª ÙØ§ ØªØ¯Ø¹Ù ÙØ°Ù Ø§ÙÙ
ÙØ²Ø©)Ø ÙÙÙ ÙØ¬Ø¨ Ø£Ù ØªÙØªÙÙ ØØ±ÙØ© Ø¥Ø¹Ø§Ø¯Ø©
-ØªÙØ²ÙØ¹ ÙØ°Ù Ø§ÙÙÙØ¦Ø§Øª ÙÙ ØØ§Ù ÙØ¬Ø¯ØªÙØ§ Ø£Ù Ø·ÙØ±ØªÙØ§.
+The freedom to redistribute copies must include binary or executable forms
+of the program, as well as source code, for both modified and unmodified
+versions.  (Distributing programs in runnable form is necessary for
+conveniently installable free operating systems.)  It is OK if there is no
+way to produce a binary or executable form for a certain program (since some
+languages don't support that feature), but you must have the freedom to
+redistribute such forms should you find or develop a way to make them.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÙØ¬Ø¹Ù ØØ±ÙØªÙ Ø¥Ø¬Ø±Ø§Ø¡ Ø§ÙØªØºÙÙØ±Ø§ØªØ ÙÙØ´Ø± Ø§ÙÙØ³Ø® Ø§ÙÙ
ÙØØ³ÙÙØ©Ø Ø°Ø§Øª ÙØ¹ÙÙØ ÙØ¬Ø¨ Ø£Ù ØªÙØªÙÙ
-Ø§ÙÙØµÙÙ ÙÙÙÙØ¯ Ø§ÙÙØµØ¯Ø±Ù ÙÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬. ÙØ°ÙÙØ Ø¥ØªØ§ØØ© 
Ø§ÙÙÙØ¯ Ø§ÙÙØµØ¯Ø±Ù Ø£ÙØ± Ø¶Ø±ÙØ±Ù ÙØØ±ÙØ©
-Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ¬ÙØ§Øª.
+In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
+to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
+source code of the program.  Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
+necessary condition for free software.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -95,9 +104,20 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Ø·Ø±ÙÙØ© ÙØ§ÙØ© ÙØªØ¹Ø¯ÙÙ Ø¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬ ÙÙ Ø¹Ù Ø·Ø±ÙÙ Ø¯ÙØ¬Ù 
Ø¨Ø§ÙÙØØ¯Ø§Øª ÙØ§ÙÙØ®Ø·Ø·Ø§Øª Ø§ÙØØ±Ø©. Ø¥Ø°Ø§ ÙØ§ÙØª
-Ø±Ø®ØµØ© Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬ ØªÙÙÙ Ø£ÙÙ ÙØ§ ØªØ³ØªØ·ÙØ¹ Ø¯ÙØ¬Ù 
Ø¨ÙØØ¯Ø© ÙÙØ¬ÙØ¯Ø©Ø ÙØ«Ù Ø§Ø´ØªØ±Ø§Ø·ÙØ§ Ø£Ù ØªÙÙÙ
-ÙØ§ÙÙ ØÙÙÙ Ø§ÙÙØ´Ø± ÙØ£Ù ÙÙØ¯ ØªØ¶ÙÙÙØ ØÙÙÙØ§ 
Ø§ÙØ±Ø®ØµØ© ÙÙÙØ¯Ø© Ø¬Ø¯Ø§ ÙÙØµÙÙØ§ ÙØØ±Ø©.
+One important way to modify a program is by merging in available free
+subroutines and modules.  If the program's license says that you cannot
+merge in a suitably licensed existing module &mdash; for instance, if it
+requires you to be the copyright holder of any code you add &mdash; then the
+license is too restrictive to qualify as free.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Freedom 3 includes the freedom to use release your modified versions as free
+software.  A free license may also permit other ways of releasing them; in
+other words, it does not have to be a <a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> license.  However, a license
+that requires modified versions to be nonfree does not qualify as a free
+license.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -115,13 +135,14 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-<q>Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ¬ÙØ§Øª Ø§ÙØØ±Ø©</q> ÙØ§ ØªØ¹ÙÙ <q>ØºÙØ± 
Ø§ÙØªØ¬Ø§Ø±ÙØ©.</q> Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬ Ø§ÙØØ± ÙØ¬Ø¨ Ø£Ù
-ÙØªØ§Ø ÙÙØ§Ø³ØªØ®Ø¯Ø§Ù Ø§ÙØªØ¬Ø§Ø±Ù ÙØ§ÙØªØ·ÙÙØ± Ø§ÙØªØ¬Ø§Ø±Ù 
ÙØ§ÙØªÙØ²ÙØ¹ Ø§ÙÙØ¬Ø§Ø±Ù. Ø§ÙØªØ·ÙÙØ± Ø§ÙØªØ¬Ø§Ø±Ù
-ÙÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ¬ÙØ§Øª Ø§ÙØØ±Ø© ÙÙ ÙØ¹Ø¯ ØºØ±ÙØ¨Ø§Ø Ø¨Ø±ÙØ¬ÙØ§Øª ØØ±Ø© 
ØªØ¬Ø§Ø±ÙØ© ÙÙØ§Ø«ÙØ© ÙÙÙØ© Ø¬Ø¯Ø§. ÙØ¯ ØªÙÙÙ
-Ø¯ÙØ¹Øª ÙØ§ÙØ§ ÙÙØØµÙÙ Ø¹ÙÙ ÙØ³Ø®Ø© Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬ Ø§ÙØØ±Ø© 
Ø£Ù ÙØ¯ ØªÙÙÙ Ø³Ø¹ÙØª ÙÙØØµÙÙ Ø¹ÙÙ ÙØ³Ø®Ø©
-Ø¨Ø¯ÙÙ ÙÙØ§Ø¨Ù. ÙÙÙ Ø¨ØºØ¶ Ø§ÙÙØ¸Ø± Ø¹Ù ÙÙÙÙØ© ØØµÙÙÙ 
Ø¹ÙÙ Ø§ÙÙØ³Ø®Ø©Ø ÙØ¯ÙÙ Ø¯Ø§Ø¦ÙØ§ ØØ±ÙØ© ÙØ³Ø®
-ÙØªØ¹Ø¯ÙÙ Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬Ø Ø¨Ù ÙØØªÙ <a 
href="/philosophy/selling.ar.html">Ø¨ÙØ¹ Ø§ÙÙØ³Ø®Ø©
-</a>.
+<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
+be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
+distribution.  Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
+such free commercial software is very important.  You may have paid money to
+get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
+But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to
+copy and change the software, even to <a
+href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -130,24 +151,28 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÙÙÙ Ø§ÙÙÙØ§Ø¹Ø¯ ØÙÙ ÙÙÙÙØ© ØØ²Ù Ø§ÙÙØ³Ø®Ø© Ø§ÙÙØ¹Ø¯ÙØ© Ù
ÙØ¨ÙÙØ©Ø Ø¥Ø°Ø§ ÙÙ ØªÙÙØ¹ Ø¹ÙÙÙØ§ ØØ±ÙØªÙ ÙÙ
-Ø¥ØµØ¯Ø§Ø± ÙÙØ³ÙØ® ÙØ¹Ø¯ÙØ©Ø Ø£Ù ØØ±ÙØªÙ ÙÙ Ø¥ÙØ´Ø§Ø¡ 
ÙØ§Ø³ØªØ®Ø¯Ø§Ù ÙÙØ³ÙØ® ÙØ¹Ø¯ÙØ© Ø¨Ø´ÙÙ Ø®Ø§Øµ. Ø§ÙÙØ§Ø¹Ø¯Ø©
-Ø§ÙØªÙ ØªØ´ØªØ±Ø· Ø£ÙÙ <q>Ø¥Ø°Ø§ Ø¬Ø¹ÙØª ÙØ³Ø®ØªÙ ÙØªØ§ØØ© Ø¨ÙØ°Ù 
Ø§ÙØ·Ø±ÙÙØ©Ø ÙØ¬Ø¨ Ø£Ù ØªØ¬Ø¹ÙÙØ§ ÙØªØ§ØØ©
-Ø¨ØªÙÙ Ø§ÙØ·Ø±ÙÙØ© Ø£ÙØ¶Ø§</q> ÙÙÙÙ Ø£Ù ØªÙÙÙ ÙÙØ¨ÙÙØ© 
Ø£ÙØ¶Ø§Ø Ø¹ÙÙ ÙÙØ³ Ø§ÙØ´Ø±Ø·. (ÙØ§ØØ¸ Ø£Ù ÙØ«Ù
-ÙØ°Ù Ø§ÙÙØ§Ø¹Ø¯Ø© ØªØ¨ÙÙ ÙÙ Ø®ÙØ§Ø± ÙØ´Ø± ÙØ³Ø®ØªÙ ÙÙ Ø¹Ø¯Ù 
ÙØ´Ø±ÙØ§.) Ø§ÙÙÙØ§Ø¹Ø¯ Ø§ÙØªÙ ØªØ·ÙØ¨ Ø¥ØµØ¯Ø§Ø±
-Ø§ÙÙÙØ¯ Ø§ÙÙØµØ¯Ø±Ù ÙÙÙØ³ØªØ®Ø¯ÙÙÙ ÙÙÙÙØ³ÙØ® Ø§ÙØªÙ 
ØªØ¶Ø¹ÙØ§ ÙÙ Ø¹ÙÙÙ Ø§ÙØ§Ø³ØªØ®Ø¯Ø§Ù ÙÙØ¨ÙÙØ©
-Ø£ÙØ¶Ø§. ÙÙ Ø§ÙÙÙØ¨ÙÙ Ø£ÙØ¶Ø§ Ø£Ù ÙØ·Ø§ÙØ¨ Ø§ÙØªØ±Ø®ÙØµ Ø¨Ø£ÙÙ 
Ø¥Ø°Ø§ ÙØ´Ø±Øª ÙØ³Ø®Ø© ÙØ¹Ø¯ÙØ© ÙØ·ÙØ¨ ÙØ·ÙØ±
-Ø³Ø§Ø¨Ù ÙØ³Ø®Ø© ÙÙÙØ§Ø ÙØ¬Ø¨ Ø£Ù ØªØ±Ø³Ù ÙØ§ØØ¯Ø©Ø Ø£Ù 
Ø§ÙÙØ§Ø¹Ø¯Ø© Ø§ÙØªÙ ØªØ´ØªØ±Ø· Ø£Ù ØªØ¹Ø±Ù ÙÙØ³Ù ÙÙ
-ØªØ¹Ø¯ÙÙØ§ØªÙ.
+However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
+they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately.  Rules that <q>if
+you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in
+that way also</q> can be acceptable too, on the same condition.  (Note that
+such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
+at all.)  Rules that require release of source code to the users for
+versions that you put into public use are also acceptable.  It is also
+acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
+as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
+developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÙÙ ÙØ´Ø±ÙØ¹ ØºÙÙØ ÙØ³Ø®Ø¯Ù <q><a 
href="/copyleft/copyleft.ar.html">Ø§ÙØÙÙÙ
-Ø§ÙÙØªØ±ÙÙØ©</a></q> ÙØÙØ§ÙØ© ÙØ°Ù Ø§ÙØØ±ÙØ§Øª ÙØ§ÙÙÙÙØ§ 
ÙÙØ¬ÙÙØ¹. ÙÙÙ <a
-href="/philosophy/categories.ar.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±Ù
Ø¬ÙØ§Øª
-Ø§ÙØØ±Ø© ØºÙØ± ÙØªØ±ÙÙØ© Ø§ÙØÙÙÙ</a> ÙØªÙÙØ±Ø© Ø£ÙØ¶Ø§. ÙØÙ 
ÙØ¤ÙÙ Ø¨ÙØ¬ÙØ¯ Ø£Ø³Ø¨Ø§Ø¨ ÙÙÙØ© <a
-href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html">ÙØ£ÙØ¶ÙÙØ© Ø§Ø³ØªØ®Ø¯Ø§Ù Ø§ÙØÙÙÙ 
Ø§ÙÙØªØ±ÙÙØ©</a>Ø ÙÙÙ
-Ø¥Ø°Ø§ ÙØ§Ù Ø¨Ø±ÙØ§ÙØ¬Ù ØØ±Ø§ ØºÙØ± ÙØªØ±ÙÙ Ø§ÙØÙÙÙØ ÙØ¥ÙÙ 
ÙØ§ ÙØ²Ø§Ù Ø£Ø®ÙØ§ÙÙØ§ Ø¨Ø´ÙÙ Ø£Ø³Ø§Ø³Ù.
+In the GNU project, we use <q><a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a></q> to protect these freedoms
+legally for everyone.  But <a
+href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
+free software</a> also exists.  We believe there are important reasons why
+<a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html">it is better to use copyleft</a>, but
+if your program is non-copylefted free software, it is still basically
+ethical.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -166,29 +191,32 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÙØ¹Ø¸Ù ØªØ±Ø§Ø®ÙØµ Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ¬ÙØ§Øª Ø§ÙØØ±Ø© ÙØ¨ÙÙØ© Ø¹ÙÙ ØÙÙÙ 
Ø§ÙÙØ´Ø±Ø ÙÙÙØ¬Ø¯ ØØ¯ÙØ¯ Ø¹ÙÙ Ø£ÙÙØ§Ø¹
-Ø§ÙÙØ·Ø§ÙØ¨ Ø§ÙØªÙ ÙÙÙÙ Ø£Ù ØªÙØ±Ø¶ÙØ§ ØÙÙÙ Ø§ÙÙØ´Ø±. Ø¥Ø°Ø§ 
ÙØ§Ù Ø§ÙØªØ±Ø®ÙØµ Ø§ÙÙØ¨ÙÙ Ø¹ÙÙ ØÙÙÙ
-Ø§ÙÙØ´Ø± ÙØØªØ±Ù Ø§ÙØØ±ÙØ§Øª Ø§ÙÙÙØ¶ØØ© Ø£Ø¹ÙØ§ÙØ ÙÙ ØºÙØ± 
Ø§ÙÙØ±Ø¬Ø Ø£Ù ÙØØªÙÙ ÙØ´Ø§ÙÙØ§ Ø£Ø®Ø±Ù ÙÙ
-ÙØªÙØ¨Ø£ Ø¨ÙØ§ (Ø±ØºÙ Ø£Ù ÙØ°Ø§ ÙØØ¯Ø« Ø£ØÙØ§ÙØ§). ÙÙ ÙØ§ØÙØ© 
Ø£Ø®Ø±ÙØ Ø¨Ø¹Ø¶ ØªØ±Ø§Ø®ÙØµ Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ¬ÙØ§Øª
-Ø§ÙØØ±Ø© ÙØ¨ÙÙØ© Ø¹ÙÙ Ø¹ÙØ¯ Ø§ØªÙØ§ÙÙØ©Ø ÙØ§ÙØ§ØªÙØ§ÙÙØ§Øª 
ÙÙÙÙÙØ§ ÙØ±Ø¶ ÙØ·Ø§Ù Ø£ÙØ³Ø¹ ÙÙ Ø§ÙÙÙÙØ¯
-Ø§ÙÙØØªÙÙØ©. ÙØ°Ø§ ÙØ¹ÙÙ ÙØ¬ÙØ¯ Ø§ÙÙØ«ÙØ± ÙÙ Ø§ÙØ·Ø±Ù Ø§ÙÙ
ÙÙÙØ© ÙØ«Ù Ø£Ù ÙÙÙÙ Ø§ÙØªØ±Ø®ÙØµ ÙÙÙÙØ¯Ø§
-Ø¨Ø´ÙÙ ØºÙØ± ÙÙØ¨ÙÙ ÙØºÙØ± ØØ±.
+Most free software licenses are based on copyright, and there are limits on
+what kinds of requirements can be imposed through copyright.  If a
+copyright-based license respects freedom in the ways described above, it is
+unlikely to have some other sort of problem that we never anticipated
+(though this does happen occasionally).  However, some free software
+licenses are based on contracts, and contracts can impose a much larger
+range of possible restrictions.  That means there are many possible ways
+such a license could be unacceptably restrictive and nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÙØ§ ÙØ³ØªØ·ÙØ¹ ÙØ¶Ø¹ ÙØ§Ø¦ÙØ© Ø¨ÙÙ Ø§ÙØ·Ø±Ù Ø§ÙÙØØªÙÙØ©. Ø¥Ø°Ø§ 
ÙØ§Ù ØªØ±Ø®ÙØµÙØ§ ÙØ¨ÙÙÙØ§ Ø¹ÙÙ Ø¹ÙØ¯
-Ø§ØªÙØ§ÙÙØ© ØªÙÙØ¯ Ø§ÙÙØ³ØªØ®Ø¯Ù Ø¨Ø´ÙÙ ØºØ±ÙØ¨ ÙØ§ ØªØ³ØªØ·ÙØ¹ 
Ø§ÙØªØ±Ø§Ø®ÙØµ Ø§ÙÙØ¨ÙÙØ© Ø¹ÙÙ ØÙÙÙ Ø§ÙÙØ´Ø±
-ÙØ¹ÙÙØ ÙØºÙØ± ÙØ°ÙÙØ± ÙÙØ§ ÙØ´Ø±Ø¹ÙØ ÙØ¬Ø¨ Ø£Ù ÙØ¯Ø±Ø³ÙØ 
ÙØ¹ÙÙ Ø§ÙØ£Ø±Ø¬Ø Ø³ÙØ¹ØªØ¨Ø±Ù ØºÙØ± ØØ±.
+We can't possibly list all the ways that might happen.  If a contract-based
+license restricts the user in an unusual way that copyright-based licenses
+cannot, and which isn't mentioned here as legitimate, we will have to think
+about it, and we will probably conclude it is nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Ø¹ÙØ¯ Ø§ÙØØ¯ÙØ« Ø¹Ù Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ¬ÙØ§Øª Ø§ÙØØ±Ø©Ø Ø§ÙØ£ÙØ¶Ù 
ØªØ¬Ø§ÙØ² Ø§Ø³ØªØ®Ø¯Ø§Ù ÙØµØ·ÙØØ§Øª ÙØ«Ù <q>ÙØ¯ÙØ©</q>
-Ø£Ù <q>Ø¨Ø§ÙÙØ¬Ø§Ù</q>Ø ÙØ£Ù ÙØ°Ù Ø§ÙÙØµØ·ÙØØ§Øª ØªØ¯Ù Ø¹ÙÙ 
Ø£Ù Ø§ÙÙØ¶ÙØ© ØÙÙ Ø§ÙØ³Ø¹Ø±Ø ÙÙÙØ³Øª
-Ø§ÙØØ±ÙØ©. Ø¨Ø¹Ø¶ Ø§ÙÙØµØ·ÙØØ§Øª Ø§ÙØ¹Ø§ÙØ© ÙØ«Ù <q>ÙØ±ØµÙØ©</q> 
ØªØ¬Ø³Ø¯ Ø¢Ø±Ø§Ø¡Ù ÙØ£ÙÙ Ø£ÙØ§
-ØªÙÙØ±ÙÙØ§. Ø±Ø§Ø¬Ø¹ <a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">ÙÙÙØ§Øª 
ÙØ¹Ø¨Ø§Ø±Ø§Øª ÙØ¶ÙÙØ©
-ØªØ³ØªØÙ Ø§ÙØªØ¬ÙØ¨</a> ÙÙÙØ§ÙØ´Ø© ÙØ°Ù Ø§ÙÙØµØ·ÙØØ§Øª. 
ÙØ¯ÙÙØ§ Ø£ÙØ¶Ø§ ÙØ§Ø¦ÙØ© <a
-href="/philosophy/fs-translations.ar.html">ØªØ±Ø¬ÙØ© <q>Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ¬ÙØ§Øª 
Ø§ÙØØ±Ø©</q></a>
-Ø¥ÙÙ ÙØºØ§Øª Ø¹Ø¯ÙØ¯Ø©.
+When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
+<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
+issue is about price, not freedom.  Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
+embody opinions we hope you won't endorse.  See <a
+href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
+Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms.  We also have a list of
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
+software</q></a> into various languages.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -210,15 +238,17 @@
 </p> 
 
 <p>
-Ø¥Ø°Ø§ ÙÙØª ØªØ±ØºØ¨ ÙÙ ÙØªØ§Ø¨Ø© ØªØ±Ø®ÙØµ Ø¬Ø¯ÙØ¯Ø ÙÙ ÙØ¶ÙÙ 
Ø±Ø§Ø³Ù Ø¥Ù&#8203;Ø¥Ø³&#8203;Ø¥Ù Ø¹Ù Ø·Ø±ÙÙ
-Ø§ÙÙØªØ§Ø¨Ø© Ø¥ÙÙ ÙØ°Ø§ Ø§ÙØ¹ÙÙØ§Ù. Ø²ÙØ§Ø¯Ø© ØªØ±Ø§Ø®ÙØµ Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±Ù
Ø¬ÙØ§Øª Ø§ÙØØ±Ø© ÙØ¹ÙÙ Ø²ÙØ§Ø¯Ø© Ø¬ÙØ¯
-Ø§ÙÙØ³ØªØ®Ø¯ÙÙÙ ÙÙÙÙ Ø§ÙØªØ±Ø§Ø®ÙØµØ Ø±Ø¨ÙØ§ ÙÙÙÙ 
ÙØ§Ø¯Ø±ÙÙ Ø¹ÙÙ ÙØ³Ø§Ø¹Ø¯ØªÙ ÙÙ Ø¥ÙØ¬Ø§Ø¯ ØªØ±Ø®ÙØµ
-Ø¨Ø±ÙØ¬ÙØ§Øª ØØ±Ø© ÙÙØ¬ÙØ¯ ÙÙØ¨Ù Ø§ØØªÙØ§Ø¬Ø§ØªÙ.
+If you are contemplating writing a new license, please contact the Free
+Software Foundation first by writing to that address. The proliferation of
+different free software licenses means increased work for users in
+understanding the licenses; we may be able to help you find an existing free
+software license that meets your needs.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Ø¥Ø°Ø§ ÙÙ ÙÙÙ ÙØ°Ø§ ÙÙÙÙØ§Ø Ø¥Ø°Ø§ ÙÙØª ØªØ±ÙØ¯ ØÙØ§ 
ØªØ±Ø®ÙØµØ§ Ø¬Ø¯ÙØ¯Ø§Ø Ø¨ÙØ³Ø§Ø¹Ø¯ØªÙØ§ ØªØ³ØªØ·ÙØ¹ Ø¶ÙØ§Ù
-Ø£Ù Ø§ÙØªØ±Ø®ÙØµ ØªØ±Ø®ÙØµ Ø¨Ø±ÙØ¬ÙØ§Øª ØØ±Ø© Ø¨Ø§ÙÙØ¹Ù 
ÙØªØªØ¬Ø§ÙØ² Ø§ÙÙØ«ÙØ± ÙÙ Ø§ÙÙØ´Ø§ÙÙ Ø§ÙØ¹ÙÙÙØ©.
+If that isn't possible, if you really need a new license, with our help you
+can ensure that the license really is a free software license and avoid
+various practical problems.
 </p>
 
 <h2 id="beyond-software">ÙØ§ ÙØ±Ø§Ø¡ Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ¬ÙØ§Øª</h2>
@@ -259,6 +289,17 @@
 <ul>
 
 <li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.89&amp;r2=1.90";>Version
+1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
+your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
+else's development project.</li>
+
+<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.88&amp;r2=1.89";>Version
+1.89</a>: Freedom 3 includes the right to release modified versions as free
+software.</li>
+
+<li><a
 
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.56&amp;r2=1.57";>Ø§ÙØ¥ØµØ¯Ø§Ø±
 1.57</a>: Ø¥Ø¶Ø§ÙØ© ÙØ³Ù &quot;ÙØ±Ø§Ø¡ Ø§ÙØ¨Ø±ÙØ¬ÙØ§Øª&quot;.</li>
 
@@ -370,7 +411,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 ØÙØ¯ÙØ«Øª:
 
-$Date: 2009/10/27 20:26:13 $
+$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:51 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: free-sw.bg.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.bg.html,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -b -r1.23 -r1.24
--- free-sw.bg.html     26 Nov 2009 09:26:10 -0000      1.23
+++ free-sw.bg.html     29 Jan 2010 09:25:52 -0000      1.24
@@ -48,19 +48,20 @@
   <li>Ð¡Ð²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑÐ° Ð´Ð° ÑÐ°Ð·Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐ°Ð½ÑÐ²Ð°Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð¿Ð¸Ñ, Ð·Ð° 
Ð´Ð° Ð¿Ð¾Ð¼Ð°Ð³Ð°Ñ Ð½Ð° Ð±Ð»Ð¸Ð¶Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÑÐ¸ (ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð°
 â2).
   </li>
-  <li>The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements (and
-modified versions in general)  to the public, so that the whole community
-benefits (freedom 3).  Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
+  <li>The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others
+(freedom 3).  By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to
+benefit from your changes.  Access to the source code is a precondition for
+this.
   </li>
 </ul>
 
 <p>
-ÐÐ´Ð½Ð° Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð° Ðµ ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ½ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐµÑ, Ð°ÐºÐ¾ 
Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ±Ð¸ÑÐµÐ»Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð¸Ð¼Ð°Ñ Ð²ÑÐ¸ÑÐºÐ¸ÑÐµ ÑÐµÑÐ¸ÑÐ¸
-ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð¸.  ÐÐ¾ ÑÐ°ÐºÑÐ² Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð½, Ð²Ð¸Ðµ ÑÑÑÐ±Ð²Ð° Ð´Ð° ÑÑÐµ 
ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¸ Ð´Ð° ÑÐ°Ð·Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐ°Ð½ÑÐ²Ð°ÑÐµ
-ÐºÐ¾Ð¿Ð¸Ñ, Ð¸Ð´ÐµÐ½ÑÐ¸ÑÐ½Ð¸ Ñ Ð¾ÑÐ¸Ð³Ð¸Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð° Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ 
Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÐµÐ½Ð¸, Ð±ÐµÐ·Ð¿Ð»Ð°ÑÐ½Ð¾ Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ ÑÑÐµÑÑ Ð·Ð°Ð¿Ð»Ð°ÑÐ°Ð½Ðµ <a
-href="#exportcontrol">Ð½Ð° Ð²ÑÐµÐºÐ¸ Ð¸ Ð½Ð°Ð²ÑÑÐºÑÐ´Ðµ</a>.  ÐÑÐ²ÐµÐ½ 
Ð²ÑÐ¸ÑÐºÐ¾ Ð´ÑÑÐ³Ð¾, ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°,
-ÑÐµ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð°ÑÐ° Ðµ ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð°, Ð¾Ð·Ð½Ð°ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°, ÑÐµ Ð½Ðµ 
ÑÑÑÐ±Ð²Ð° Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ Ð¼Ð¾Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ Ð´Ð°
-Ð¿Ð»Ð°ÑÐ°ÑÐµ, Ð·Ð° Ð´Ð° ÑÐ¿ÑÐ°Ð¶Ð½Ð¸ÑÐµ ÑÐµÐ·Ð¸ ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð¸.
+A program is free software if users have all of these freedoms.  Thus, you
+should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without modifications,
+either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to <a
+href="#exportcontrol">anyone anywhere</a>.  Being free to do these things
+means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission
+to do so.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -72,33 +73,31 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Ð¡Ð²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑÐ° Ð´Ð° Ð¸Ð·Ð¿ÑÐ»Ð½ÑÐ²Ð°Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð°ÑÐ° 
Ð¾Ð·Ð½Ð°ÑÐ°Ð²Ð° ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð° Ð·Ð° Ð¸Ð·Ð¿ÑÐ»Ð½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð¾Ñ Ð²ÑÐµÐºÐ¸
-Ð¸Ð½Ð´Ð¸Ð²Ð¸Ð´ Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ Ð¾ÑÐ³Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ð·Ð°ÑÐ¸Ñ, Ð²ÑÑÑÑ Ð²ÑÑÐºÐ° 
ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ð¿ÑÑÑÑÐ½Ð° ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐµÐ¼Ð°, Ð·Ð° ÐºÐ°ÐºÐ²Ð°ÑÐ¾ Ð¸ Ð´Ð° Ðµ
-ÑÐ°Ð±Ð¾ÑÐ° Ð¸ ÑÐµÐ», Ð±ÐµÐ· Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ Ð¸Ð·Ð¸ÑÐºÐ²Ð° Ð´Ð° ÑÑÐ¾Ð±ÑÐ¸ÑÐµ 
Ð·Ð° ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð° Ð½Ð° ÑÐ°Ð·ÑÐ°Ð±Ð¾ÑÑÐ¸ÐºÐ° Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ Ð½Ð°
-ÐºÐ¾ÐµÑÐ¾ Ð¸ Ð´Ð° Ðµ Ð´ÑÑÐ³Ð¾ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµ.  ÐÐ° ÑÐ°Ð·Ð¸ ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð° Ðµ 
Ð²Ð°Ð¶Ð½Ð° Ð³Ð»ÐµÐ´Ð½Ð°ÑÐ° ÑÐ¾ÑÐºÐ° Ð½Ð°
-<em>Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ±Ð¸ÑÐµÐ»Ñ</em>, a <em>Ð½Ðµ Ð½Ð° 
ÑÐ°Ð·ÑÐ°Ð±Ð¾ÑÑÐ¸ÐºÐ°</em>.  ÐÐ¸Ðµ ÐºÐ°ÑÐ¾ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ±Ð¸ÑÐµÐ»
-ÑÑÐµ ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¸ Ð´Ð° Ð¸Ð·Ð¿Ð¾Ð»Ð·Ð²Ð°ÑÐµ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐµÑÐ° Ð·Ð° 
Ð²Ð°ÑÐ¸ÑÐµ ÑÐ¸ ÑÐµÐ»Ð¸, Ð° Ð°ÐºÐ¾ ÑÐ°Ð·Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸ÑÐµ
-Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð°ÑÐ° ÐºÑÐ¼ Ð´ÑÑÐ³Ð¸Ð³Ð¾, ÑÐ¾Ð¹ ÑÐµ Ðµ ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ½ 
Ð´Ð° Ð¸Ð·Ð¿Ð¾Ð»Ð·Ð²Ð° Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð°ÑÐ° Ð·Ð° ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð¸ÑÐµ
-ÑÐ¸ ÑÐµÐ»Ð¸, Ð½Ð¾ Ð²Ð¸Ðµ Ð½ÑÐ¼Ð°ÑÐµ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾ Ð´Ð° Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð°Ð³Ð°ÑÐµ 
ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð¸ÑÐµ ÑÐµÐ»Ð¸ Ð½Ð° Ð´ÑÑÐ³Ð¸Ñ.
+The freedom to run the program means the freedom for any kind of person or
+organization to use it on any kind of computer system, for any kind of
+overall job and purpose, without being required to communicate about it with
+the developer or any other specific entity.  In this freedom, it is the
+<em>user's</em> purpose that matters, not the <em>developer's</em> purpose;
+you as a user are free to run the program for your purposes, and if you
+distribute it to someone else, she is then free to run it for her purposes,
+but you are not entitled to impose your purposes on her.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Ð¡Ð²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑÐ° Ð´Ð° ÑÐ°Ð·Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐ°Ð½ÑÐ²Ð°Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð¿Ð¸Ñ ÑÑÑÐ±Ð²Ð° 
Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ Ð¾ÑÐ½Ð°ÑÑ ÐºÐ°ÐºÑÐ¾ Ð·Ð° Ð´Ð²Ð¾Ð¸ÑÐ½Ð¸ÑÐµ
-Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ Ð¸Ð·Ð¿ÑÐ»Ð½Ð¸Ð¼Ð¸ÑÐµ ÑÐ¾ÑÐ¼Ð¸ Ð½Ð° Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð°ÑÐ°, ÑÐ°ÐºÐ° 
Ð¸ Ð·Ð° ÑÐ¾ÑÐ¼Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð² Ð¸Ð·ÑÐ¾Ð´ÐµÐ½ ÐºÐ¾Ð´, ÐºÐ°ÐºÑÐ¾
-Ð·Ð° Ð¾ÑÐ¸Ð³Ð¸Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð½Ð¸ÑÐµ, ÑÐ°ÐºÐ° Ð¸ Ð·Ð° Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÐµÐ½Ð¸ÑÐµ 
Ð²ÐµÑÑÐ¸Ð¸.  (Ð Ð°Ð·Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐ°Ð½ÐµÐ½Ð¸ÐµÑÐ¾ Ð½Ð°
-Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¸ Ð² Ð¸Ð·Ð¿ÑÐ»Ð½Ð¸Ð¼Ð° ÑÐ¾ÑÐ¼Ð° Ðµ Ð½ÐµÐ¾Ð±ÑÐ¾Ð´Ð¸Ð¼Ð¾ Ð·Ð° 
ÑÐ´Ð¾Ð±Ð½Ð¾ Ð¸Ð½ÑÑÐ°Ð»Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð½Ðµ Ð½Ð° ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¸
-Ð¾Ð¿ÐµÑÐ°ÑÐ¸Ð¾Ð½Ð½Ð¸ ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐµÐ¼Ð¸.)  ÐÐ¾ÑÐ¼Ð°Ð»Ð½Ð¾ Ðµ Ð·Ð° Ð½ÑÐºÐ¾Ð¸ 
Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¸ Ð´Ð° Ð½ÑÐ¼Ð° Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð½ Ð·Ð°
-ÑÑÐ·Ð´Ð°Ð²Ð°Ð½ÐµÑÐ¾ Ð½Ð° Ð¿ÑÐµÐ´ÑÑÐ°Ð²ÑÐ½Ðµ Ð² Ð´Ð²Ð¾Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ 
Ð¸Ð·Ð¿ÑÐ»Ð½Ð¸Ð¼ Ð²Ð¸Ð´ (Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÐµÐ¶Ðµ Ð½ÑÐºÐ¾Ð¸ ÐµÐ·Ð¸ÑÐ¸ Ð½Ðµ
-Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ð´ÑÑÐ¶Ð°Ñ ÑÐ°Ð·Ð¸ Ð²ÑÐ·Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾ÑÑ), Ð½Ð¾ Ð²Ð¸Ðµ ÑÑÑÐ±Ð²Ð° 
Ð´Ð° Ð¸Ð¼Ð°ÑÐµ ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑÐ° Ð´Ð°
-ÑÐ°Ð·Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐ°Ð½ÑÐ²Ð°ÑÐµ ÑÐ°ÐºÐ¸Ð²Ð° ÑÐ¾ÑÐ¼Ð¸, Ð°ÐºÐ¾ 
Ð½Ð°Ð¼ÐµÑÐ¸ÑÐµ Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ Ð¸Ð·Ð¾Ð±ÑÐµÑÐ¸ÑÐµ Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð½ Ð´Ð° Ð³Ð¸
-ÑÑÐ·Ð´Ð°Ð²Ð°ÑÐµ.
+The freedom to redistribute copies must include binary or executable forms
+of the program, as well as source code, for both modified and unmodified
+versions.  (Distributing programs in runnable form is necessary for
+conveniently installable free operating systems.)  It is OK if there is no
+way to produce a binary or executable form for a certain program (since some
+languages don't support that feature), but you must have the freedom to
+redistribute such forms should you find or develop a way to make them.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÐÐ° Ð´Ð° Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ðµ ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð´Ð° Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð¼ÐµÐ½Ð¸ Ð¸ 
Ð´Ð° Ð¿ÑÐ±Ð»Ð¸ÐºÑÐ²Ð°ÑÐµ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÐµÐ½Ð¸ Ð²ÐµÑÑÐ¸Ð¸,
-Ð´Ð° Ð¾Ð·Ð½Ð°ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°Ñ Ð½ÐµÑÐ¾ ÑÐµÐ°Ð»Ð½Ð¾, Ð²Ð¸Ðµ ÑÑÑÐ±Ð²Ð° Ð´Ð° 
Ð¸Ð¼Ð°ÑÐµ Ð´Ð¾ÑÑÑÐ¿ Ð´Ð¾ Ð¸Ð·ÑÐ¾Ð´Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð´ Ð½Ð°
-Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð°ÑÐ°.  ÐÐ°ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð° Ð´Ð¾ÑÑÑÐ¿ÑÑ Ð´Ð¾ Ð¸Ð·ÑÐ¾Ð´Ð½Ð¸Ñ 
ÐºÐ¾Ð´ Ðµ Ð½ÐµÐ¾Ð±ÑÐ¾Ð´Ð¸Ð¼Ð¾ ÑÑÐ»Ð¾Ð²Ð¸Ðµ, Ð·Ð° Ð´Ð°
-Ð±ÑÐ´Ðµ ÐµÐ´Ð½Ð° Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð° ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ½ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐµÑ.
+In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
+to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
+source code of the program.  Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
+necessary condition for free software.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -115,9 +114,18 @@
 <p>
 One important way to modify a program is by merging in available free
 subroutines and modules.  If the program's license says that you cannot
-merge in a suitably-licensed existing module, such as if it requires you to
-be the copyright holder of any code you add, then the license is too
-restrictive to qualify as free.
+merge in a suitably licensed existing module &mdash; for instance, if it
+requires you to be the copyright holder of any code you add &mdash; then the
+license is too restrictive to qualify as free.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Freedom 3 includes the freedom to use release your modified versions as free
+software.  A free license may also permit other ways of releasing them; in
+other words, it does not have to be a <a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> license.  However, a license
+that requires modified versions to be nonfree does not qualify as a free
+license.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -138,8 +146,8 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>non-commercial.</q> A free program
-must be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
+<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
+be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
 distribution.  Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
 such free commercial software is very important.  You may have paid money to
 get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
@@ -163,9 +171,9 @@
 such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
 at all.)  Rules that require release of source code to the users for
 versions that you put into public use are also acceptable.  It is also
-acceptable for the license to require that, if you have distributed a
-modified version and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must
-send one, or that you identify yourself on your modifications.
+acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
+as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
+developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -174,7 +182,7 @@
 legally for everyone.  But <a
 href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
 free software</a> also exists.  We believe there are important reasons why
-<a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html"> it is better to use copyleft</a>, but
+<a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html">it is better to use copyleft</a>, but
 if your program is non-copylefted free software, it is still basically
 ethical.
 </p>
@@ -198,36 +206,32 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÐÐ¾Ð²ÐµÑÐµÑÐ¾ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¸ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð·Ð¸ ÑÐ° Ð±Ð°Ð·Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸ Ð½Ð° 
Ð°Ð²ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¾ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾ Ð¸ Ð¸Ð¼Ð° Ð³ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸ÑÐ¸ Ð·Ð°
-ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð° ÐºÐ°ÐºÐ²Ð¸ Ð¸Ð·Ð¸ÑÐºÐ²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ð°Ñ Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð°Ð³Ð°Ñ 
ÑÑÐµÐ· Ð½ÐµÐ³Ð¾.  ÐÐºÐ¾ ÐµÐ´Ð¸Ð½ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐµÑÐµÐ½
-Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð·, ÐºÐ¾Ð¹ÑÐ¾ Ðµ Ð¾ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½ Ð½Ð° Ð°Ð²ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¾ 
Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾, ÑÐ¿Ð°Ð·Ð²Ð° ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð¿Ð¾ Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð½Ð¸ÑÐµ
-Ð¾Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸ Ð¿Ð¾-Ð³Ð¾ÑÐµ, Ð¼Ð°Ð»ÐºÐ¾ Ð²ÐµÑÐ¾ÑÑÐ½Ð¾ Ðµ Ð´Ð° 
Ð²ÑÐ·Ð½Ð¸ÐºÐ½Ðµ Ð½ÑÐºÐ°ÐºÑÐ² Ð´ÑÑÐ³ Ð²Ð¸Ð´ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±Ð»ÐµÐ¼,
-ÐºÐ¾Ð¹ÑÐ¾ Ð´Ð° Ð½Ðµ ÑÐ¼Ðµ Ð¾ÑÐ°ÐºÐ²Ð°Ð»Ð¸ (Ð²ÑÐµ Ð¿Ð°Ðº, Ð¾Ñ Ð²ÑÐµÐ¼Ðµ 
Ð½Ð° Ð²ÑÐµÐ¼Ðµ Ð¸ ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð° ÑÐµ ÑÐ»ÑÑÐ²Ð°).  ÐÐ¼Ð°
-Ð¾Ð±Ð°ÑÐµ Ð¸ ÑÐ°ÐºÐ¸Ð²Ð° Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð·Ð¸ Ð·Ð° ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ½ 
ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐµÑ, ÐºÐ¾Ð¸ÑÐ¾ ÑÐµ Ð±Ð°Ð·Ð¸ÑÐ°Ñ Ð½Ð° Ð´Ð¾Ð³Ð¾Ð²Ð¾ÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÐ¾
-Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾, Ð° ÑÑÐµÐ· Ð´Ð¾Ð³Ð¾Ð²Ð¾ÑÐ¸ÑÐµ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ð°Ñ Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ 
Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð°Ð³Ð°Ñ Ð·Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸ÑÐµÐ»Ð½Ð¾ Ð¿Ð¾-Ð³Ð¾Ð»ÑÐ¼ ÑÐ¿ÐµÐºÑÑÑ Ð¾Ñ
-Ð¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ.  Ð¢Ð¾Ð²Ð° Ð¾Ð·Ð½Ð°ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°, ÑÐµ Ð¸Ð¼Ð° Ð¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ 
Ð²ÑÐ·Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾ÑÑÐ¸ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ð¾Ð±Ð½Ð¸ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð·Ð¸ Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ
-Ð¾ÐºÐ°Ð¶Ð°Ñ Ð½ÐµÐ¿ÑÐ¸ÐµÐ¼Ð»Ð¸Ð²Ð¾ Ð¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°ÑÐ¸ Ð¸ 
ÑÐ»ÐµÐ´Ð¾Ð²Ð°ÑÐµÐ»Ð½Ð¾ â Ð´Ð° Ð½Ðµ ÑÐ° Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð·Ð¸ Ð½Ð°
-ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ½ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐµÑ.
+Most free software licenses are based on copyright, and there are limits on
+what kinds of requirements can be imposed through copyright.  If a
+copyright-based license respects freedom in the ways described above, it is
+unlikely to have some other sort of problem that we never anticipated
+(though this does happen occasionally).  However, some free software
+licenses are based on contracts, and contracts can impose a much larger
+range of possible restrictions.  That means there are many possible ways
+such a license could be unacceptably restrictive and nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÐÑÐ¼Ð°Ð¼Ðµ Ð²ÑÐ·Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾ÑÑ Ð´Ð° Ð¸Ð·Ð±ÑÐ¾Ð¸Ð¼ Ð²ÑÐ¸ÑÐºÐ¸ 
Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð½Ð¸, Ð¿Ð¾ ÐºÐ¾Ð¸ÑÐ¾ ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð° Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ðµ Ð´Ð° ÑÑÐ°Ð½Ðµ.
-ÐÐºÐ¾ Ð±Ð°Ð·Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð½Ð° Ð´Ð¾Ð³Ð¾Ð²Ð¾ÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÐ¾ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾ 
ÑÐ³Ð¾Ð²Ð¾ÑÐºÐ¸ Ð² ÐµÐ´Ð¸Ð½ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð· Ð¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°Ñ
-Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ±Ð¸ÑÐµÐ»Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ Ð½ÐµÐ¾Ð±Ð¸ÑÐ°ÐµÐ½ Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð½, ÐºÐ¾Ð¹ÑÐ¾ Ðµ 
Ð½ÐµÐ²ÑÐ·Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÐ½ Ð·Ð° Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð· Ð±Ð°Ð·Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð½ Ð½Ð°
-Ð°Ð²ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¾ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾, Ð¸ Ð°ÐºÐ¾ Ð¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð¸ÐµÑÐ¾ Ð½Ðµ Ðµ 
Ð¸Ð·Ð±ÑÐ¾ÐµÐ½Ð¾ ÑÑÐº ÐºÐ°ÑÐ¾ Ð´Ð¾Ð¿ÑÑÑÐ¸Ð¼Ð¾, ÑÐµ
-ÑÑÑÐ±Ð²Ð° Ð´Ð° Ð¿Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸ÑÐ»Ð¸Ð¼ Ð²ÑÑÑÑ Ð½ÐµÐ³Ð¾ Ð¸ Ðµ Ð²ÐµÑÐ¾ÑÑÐ½Ð¾ 
Ð´Ð° Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ»ÑÑÐ¸Ð¼, ÑÐµ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð·ÑÑ Ð½Ðµ Ðµ
-ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ½.
+We can't possibly list all the ways that might happen.  If a contract-based
+license restricts the user in an unusual way that copyright-based licenses
+cannot, and which isn't mentioned here as legitimate, we will have to think
+about it, and we will probably conclude it is nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÐÐ¾Ð³Ð°ÑÐ¾ Ð³Ð¾Ð²Ð¾ÑÐ¸ÑÐµ Ð·Ð° ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ½ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐµÑ, 
Ð½Ð°Ð¹-Ð´Ð¾Ð±ÑÐµ Ðµ Ð´Ð° Ð¸Ð·Ð±ÑÐ³Ð²Ð°ÑÐµ Ð¸Ð·ÑÐ°Ð·Ð¸ ÐºÐ°ÑÐ¾
-âÐ±ÐµÐ· Ð¿Ð°ÑÐ¸â Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ âÐ±ÐµÐ·Ð¿Ð»Ð°ÑÐµÐ½â, Ð·Ð°ÑÐ¾ÑÐ¾ ÑÐµÐ·Ð¸ 
ÑÐµÑÐ¼Ð¸Ð½Ð¸ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´ÑÐºÐ°Ð·Ð²Ð°Ñ, ÑÐµ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±Ð»ÐµÐ¼ÑÑ Ðµ
-ÑÐµÐ½Ð°ÑÐ°, Ð° Ð½Ðµ ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑÐ°.  ÐÑÐºÐ¾Ð¸ ÑÐµÑÑÐ¾ 
ÑÐ¿Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ±ÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ð¸ ÑÐµÑÐ¼Ð¸Ð½Ð¸ ÐºÐ°ÑÐ¾ âÐ¿Ð¸ÑÐ°ÑÑÑÐ²Ð¾â
-Ð²ÑÐ¿Ð»ÑÑÐ°Ð²Ð°Ñ Ð² ÑÐµÐ±Ðµ ÑÐ¸ ÑÐµÐ·Ð¸, ÐºÐ¾Ð¸ÑÐ¾ ÑÐµ 
Ð½Ð°Ð´ÑÐ²Ð°Ð¼Ðµ, ÑÐµ Ð½Ðµ ÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ»ÑÑÐµ.  ÐÐ¾Ð³Ð»ÐµÐ´Ð½ÐµÑÐµ
-ÑÑÐ°ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐ° <a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">ÐÐ±ÑÑÐºÐ²Ð°ÑÐ¸ 
Ð´ÑÐ¼Ð¸ Ð¸ ÑÑÐ°Ð·Ð¸,
-ÐºÐ¾Ð¸ÑÐ¾ Ðµ Ð´Ð¾Ð±ÑÐµ Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ Ð¸Ð·Ð±ÑÐ³Ð²Ð°Ñ</a> Ð·Ð° 
Ð¾Ð±ÑÑÐ½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð½Ð° ÑÐµÐ·Ð¸ ÑÐµÑÐ¼Ð¸Ð½Ð¸. ÐÐ°Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²ÐµÐ½ Ðµ Ð¸
-ÑÐ¿Ð¸ÑÑÐº Ñ <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">Ð¿ÑÐµÐ²Ð¾Ð´Ð¸ÑÐµ 
Ð½Ð° âÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ½
-ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐµÑâ</a> Ð½Ð° ÑÐ°Ð·Ð»Ð¸ÑÐ½Ð¸ ÐµÐ·Ð¸ÑÐ¸.
+When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
+<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
+issue is about price, not freedom.  Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
+embody opinions we hope you won't endorse.  See <a
+href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
+Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms.  We also have a list of
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
+software</q></a> into various languages.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -254,17 +258,17 @@
 </p> 
 
 <p>
-ÐÐºÐ¾ Ð²ÑÐ·Ð½Ð°Ð¼ÐµÑÑÐ²Ð°ÑÐµ Ð´Ð° Ð½Ð°Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐµ Ð½Ð¾Ð² Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð·, 
Ð¼Ð¾Ð»Ñ Ð¾Ð±ÑÑÐ½ÐµÑÐµ ÑÐµ ÐºÑÐ¼ Ð¤Ð¡Ð¡, ÐºÐ°ÑÐ¾
-Ð½Ð°Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐµ Ðµ-Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐ¼Ð¾ Ð½Ð° Ð³Ð¾ÑÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð°Ð´ÑÐµÑ.  
Ð£Ð¼Ð½Ð¾Ð¶Ð°Ð²Ð°Ð½ÐµÑÐ¾ Ð½Ð° ÑÐ°Ð·Ð»Ð¸ÑÐ½Ð¸ÑÐµ ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¸
-ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¸ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð·Ð¸ Ð¾Ð·Ð½Ð°ÑÐ°Ð²Ð° Ð¿Ð¾Ð²ÐµÑÐµ ÑÐ°Ð±Ð¾ÑÐ° 
Ð·Ð° Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ±Ð¸ÑÐµÐ»Ð¸ÑÐµ, Ð·Ð° Ð´Ð° Ð³Ð¸
-ÑÐ°Ð·Ð±ÐµÑÐ°Ñ.  ÐÑÐ·Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾ Ðµ Ð´Ð° ÑÐ¼Ðµ Ð² ÑÑÑÑÐ¾ÑÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð´Ð° 
Ð²Ð¸ Ð¿Ð¾Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ð½ÐµÐ¼, ÐºÐ°ÑÐ¾ Ð½Ð°Ð¼ÐµÑÐ¸Ð¼
-ÑÑÑÐµÑÑÐ²ÑÐ²Ð°Ñ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð· Ð½Ð° ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ½ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐµÑ, 
ÐºÐ¾Ð¹ÑÐ¾ Ð¾ÑÐ³Ð¾Ð²Ð°ÑÑ Ð½Ð° Ð½ÑÐ¶Ð´Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð²Ð¸.
+If you are contemplating writing a new license, please contact the Free
+Software Foundation first by writing to that address. The proliferation of
+different free software licenses means increased work for users in
+understanding the licenses; we may be able to help you find an existing free
+software license that meets your needs.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÐÐºÐ¾ ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð° Ðµ Ð½ÐµÐ²ÑÐ·Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾, Ð°ÐºÐ¾ Ð½Ð°Ð¸ÑÑÐ¸Ð½Ð° ÑÐµ 
Ð½ÑÐ¶Ð´Ð°ÐµÑÐµ Ð¾Ñ Ð½Ð¾Ð² Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð·, Ñ Ð½Ð°ÑÐ° Ð¿Ð¾Ð¼Ð¾Ñ
-ÑÐµ ÑÑÐµ ÑÐ¸Ð³ÑÑÐ½Ð¸, ÑÐµ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð·ÑÑ Ð½Ð°Ð¸ÑÑÐ¸Ð½Ð° Ðµ 
Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð· Ð½Ð° ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ½ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐµÑ Ð¸ ÑÐµ
-Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑÐµ Ð´Ð° Ð¿ÑÐµÑÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¸ÑÐµ Ð½ÑÐºÐ¾Ð¸ Ð¿ÑÐ°ÐºÑÐ¸ÑÐµÑÐºÐ¸ 
Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±Ð»ÐµÐ¼Ð¸.
+If that isn't possible, if you really need a new license, with our help you
+can ensure that the license really is a free software license and avoid
+various practical problems.
 </p>
 
 <h2 id="beyond-software">ÐÑÐ²ÑÐ´ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÑÐµÑÐ°</h2>
@@ -310,6 +314,17 @@
 <ul>
 
 <li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.89&amp;r2=1.90";>Version
+1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
+your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
+else's development project.</li>
+
+<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.88&amp;r2=1.89";>Version
+1.89</a>: Freedom 3 includes the right to release modified versions as free
+software.</li>
+
+<li><a
 
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.79&amp;r2=1.80";>Version
 1.80</a>: Freedom 1 must be practical, not just theoretical; i.e., no
 tivoization.</li>
@@ -451,7 +466,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 ÐÐ¾ÑÐ»ÐµÐ´Ð½Ð¾ Ð¾Ð±Ð½Ð¾Ð²ÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ðµ:
 
-$Date: 2009/11/26 09:26:10 $
+$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:52 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: free-sw.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.57
retrieving revision 1.58
diff -u -b -r1.57 -r1.58
--- free-sw.fr.html     29 Nov 2009 21:26:39 -0000      1.57
+++ free-sw.fr.html     29 Jan 2010 09:25:52 -0000      1.58
@@ -50,20 +50,20 @@
   <li>La libert&eacute; de redistribuer des copies, donc d'aider votre voisin,
 (libert&eacute; 2).
   </li>
-  <li>La libert&eacute; d'am&eacute;liorer le programme et de publier vos
-am&eacute;liorations, pour en faire profiter toute la communaut&eacute;
-libert&eacute; 3). Pour ceci l'acc&egrave;s au code source est une condition
-requise.
+  <li>The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others
+(freedom 3).  By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to
+benefit from your changes.  Access to the source code is a precondition for
+this.
   </li>
 </ul>
 
 <p>
-Un programme est un logiciel libre si les utilisateurs ont toutes ces
-libert&eacute;s. Ainsi, vous &ecirc;tes libre de redistribuer des copies,
-avec ou sans modification, gratuitement ou non, &agrave; <a
-href="#exportcontrol">tout le monde, partout</a>. &Ecirc;tre libre de faire
-ceci signifie (entre autre) que vous n'avez pas &agrave; demander ou
-&agrave; payer pour en avoir la permission.
+A program is free software if users have all of these freedoms.  Thus, you
+should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without modifications,
+either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to <a
+href="#exportcontrol">anyone anywhere</a>.  Being free to do these things
+means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission
+to do so.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -75,37 +75,31 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-La libert&eacute; d'utiliser un programme est la libert&eacute; pour tout
-type de personne ou d'organisation de l'utiliser pour tout type de
-syst&egrave;me informatique, pour tout type de t&acirc;che et sans
-&ecirc;tre oblig&eacute; de communiquer &agrave; ce sujet avec le
-d&eacute;veloppeur ou tout autre entit&eacute; sp&eacute;cifique. Dans cette
-libert&eacute;, il est question de <em>l'utilisateur</em>, pas du
-d&eacute;veloppeur&nbsp;; en tant qu'utilisateur, vous &ecirc;tes libre
-d'ex&eacute;cuter un programme comme bon vous semble et si vous le
-redistribuer &agrave; quelqu'un d'autre, cette personne est libre de
-l'ex&eacute;cuter comme bon lui semble, mais vous n'&ecirc;tes pas
-autoris&eacute; &agrave; lui imposer vos conditions.
+The freedom to run the program means the freedom for any kind of person or
+organization to use it on any kind of computer system, for any kind of
+overall job and purpose, without being required to communicate about it with
+the developer or any other specific entity.  In this freedom, it is the
+<em>user's</em> purpose that matters, not the <em>developer's</em> purpose;
+you as a user are free to run the program for your purposes, and if you
+distribute it to someone else, she is then free to run it for her purposes,
+but you are not entitled to impose your purposes on her.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-La libert&eacute; de redistribuer des copies doit inclure les formes
-binaires ou ex&eacute;cutables du programme (tout comme le code source)
-&agrave; la fois pour les versions modifi&eacute;es ou non modifi&eacute;es
-du programme. (Diffuser des programmes sous une forme ex&eacute;cutable est
-n&eacute;cessaire pour une installation commode des syst&eacute;mes
-d'exploitation libres). Il y a une exception s'il n'y a pas moyen de
-produire une version binaire ou ex&eacute;cutable (puisque certains langages
-ne supportent pas cette caract&eacute;ristique), mais le public doit avoir
-la libert&eacute; de distribuer de telles formes s'ils ont un moyen d'en
-produire.
+The freedom to redistribute copies must include binary or executable forms
+of the program, as well as source code, for both modified and unmodified
+versions.  (Distributing programs in runnable form is necessary for
+conveniently installable free operating systems.)  It is OK if there is no
+way to produce a binary or executable form for a certain program (since some
+languages don't support that feature), but you must have the freedom to
+redistribute such forms should you find or develop a way to make them.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Pour avoir la libert&eacute; d'effectuer des modifications et de publier des
-versions am&eacute;lior&eacute;es, vous devez avoir l'acc&egrave;s au code
-source du programme. Par cons&eacute;quent, l'accessibilit&eacute; du code
-source est une condition requise pour un logiciel libre.
+In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
+to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
+source code of the program.  Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
+necessary condition for free software.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -121,12 +115,20 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Un moyen important de modifier un programme est de le fusionner avec des
-modules ou des sous-programmes disponibles libres. Si la licence du
-programme indique que vous ne pouvez pas le fusionner dans un module
-existant, telle que la n&eacute;cessit&eacute; que vous soyez le
-d&eacute;tenteur du copyright de tout code que vous ajoutez, alors la
-licence est trop restrictive pour &ecirc;tre qualifi&eacute;e de libre.
+One important way to modify a program is by merging in available free
+subroutines and modules.  If the program's license says that you cannot
+merge in a suitably licensed existing module &mdash; for instance, if it
+requires you to be the copyright holder of any code you add &mdash; then the
+license is too restrictive to qualify as free.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Freedom 3 includes the freedom to use release your modified versions as free
+software.  A free license may also permit other ways of releasing them; in
+other words, it does not have to be a <a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> license.  However, a license
+that requires modified versions to be nonfree does not qualify as a free
+license.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -151,17 +153,14 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-&laquo;&nbsp;Logiciel libre&nbsp;&raquo; ne signifie pas &laquo;&nbsp;non
-commercial&nbsp;&raquo;. Un logiciel libre doit &ecirc;tre disponible pour
-un usage commercial, pour le d&eacute;veloppement commercial et la
-distribution commerciale. Le d&eacute;veloppement commercial de logiciel
-libre n'est plus l'exception&nbsp;; de tels logiciels libres commerciaux
-sont tr&egrave;s importants. Vous pouvez avoir pay&eacute; pour obtenir une
-copie d'un logiciel libre ou vous pouvez l'avoir obtenu gratuitement. Mais
-indiff&eacute;remment de la mani&egrave;re dont vous vous
-l'&ecirc;tesprocur&eacute;, vous avez toujours la libert&eacute; de copier
-et de modifier un logiciel et m&ecirc;me d'en <a
-href="/philosophy/selling.fr.html">vendre des copies</a>.
+<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
+be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
+distribution.  Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
+such free commercial software is very important.  You may have paid money to
+get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
+But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to
+copy and change the software, even to <a
+href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -171,20 +170,17 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Les r&egrave;gles sur la mani&egrave;re d'empaqueter une version
-modifi&eacute;e sont acceptables si elles n'entravent pas votre
-libert&eacute; de la publier, ou votre libert&eacute; de faire et d'utiliser
-pour votre usage personnel des versions modifi&eacute;es. Les r&egrave;gles
-disant &laquo;&nbsp;si vous publiez le programme par ce moyen, vous devez le
-faire par ce moyen aussi&nbsp;&raquo; sont acceptables aux m&ecirc;mes
-conditions (notez que de telles r&egrave;gles doivent vous laisser le choix
-de publier ou non le programme). Les r&egrave;gles qui n&eacute;cessitent
-que le code source soit publi&eacute; pour les utilisateurs pour les
-versions que vous rendez publiques sont aussi acceptables. Il est
-&eacute;galement acceptable que la licence l'exige, si vous avez
-distribu&eacute; une version modifi&eacute;e et qu'un d&eacute;veloppeur
-pr&eacute;c&eacute;dent vous en demande une copie, vous devez lui envoyer,
-ou que vous indiquiez vos modifications.
+However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
+they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately.  Rules that <q>if
+you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in
+that way also</q> can be acceptable too, on the same condition.  (Note that
+such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
+at all.)  Rules that require release of source code to the users for
+versions that you put into public use are also acceptable.  It is also
+acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
+as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
+developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -193,9 +189,9 @@
 prot&eacute;ger ces libert&eacute;s. Mais des <a
 href="/philosophy/categories.fr.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">logiciels
 libres non-copyleft&eacute;s</a> existent aussi. Nous croyons qu'il y a de
-bonnes raisons qui font <a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.fr.html"> qu'il est
+bonnes raisons qui font <a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.fr.html">qu'il est
 mieux d'utiliser le copyleft</a>, mais si votre programme est libre
-non-copyleft&eacute;, nous pouvons tout de m&ecirc;me l'utiliser.
+non-copyleft&eacute;, il est quand mÃªme basiquement Ã©thique.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -218,41 +214,32 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-La plupart des licences de logiciels sont bas&eacute;es sur le droit
-d'auteur, or les types d'exigences que le droit d'auteur peut imposer ont
-des limites. Si une licence bas&eacute;e sur le droit d'auteur respecte la
-libert&eacute; de la mani&egrave;re d&eacute;crite plus haut, il est
-improbable que nous ayons une autre sorte de probl&egrave;me que nous
-n'ayons pas anticip&eacute; (bien que cela arrive parfois). Cependant,
-certaines licences de logiciels sont bas&eacute;es sur le droit du contrat
-et les contrats impliquent un champ bien plus large de restrictions. Cela
-signifie qu'il y a bien plus de possibilit&eacute;s pour qu'une licence de
-ce type puisse restreindre de mani&egrave;re inacceptable la libert&eacute;
-des utilisateurs et ainsi devenir non libre.
+Most free software licenses are based on copyright, and there are limits on
+what kinds of requirements can be imposed through copyright.  If a
+copyright-based license respects freedom in the ways described above, it is
+unlikely to have some other sort of problem that we never anticipated
+(though this does happen occasionally).  However, some free software
+licenses are based on contracts, and contracts can impose a much larger
+range of possible restrictions.  That means there are many possible ways
+such a license could be unacceptably restrictive and nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Nous ne pouvons pas lister tout ce qui pourrait se passer. Si une licence
-bas&eacute;e sur le contrat restreint l'utilisateur d'une mani&egrave;re
-inhabituelle que les licences bas&eacute;es sur le copyright ne peuvent pas
-faire et qui n'est pas mentionn&eacute;e ici comme l&eacute;gitime, nous
-devrons y r&eacute;fl&eacute;chir et nous conclurons probablement qu'elle
-n'est pas libre.
+We can't possibly list all the ways that might happen.  If a contract-based
+license restricts the user in an unusual way that copyright-based licenses
+cannot, and which isn't mentioned here as legitimate, we will have to think
+about it, and we will probably conclude it is nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Quand vous parlez des logiciels libres, il est pr&eacute;f&eacute;rable de
-ne pas utiliser de termes comme &laquo;&nbsp;donner&nbsp;&raquo; ou
-&laquo;&nbsp;gratuit&nbsp;&raquo;, car ils laissent supposer que la
-finalit&eacute; des logiciels libres est le prix et non la
-libert&eacute;. Certains termes r&eacute;pandus comme
-&laquo;&nbsp;piratage&nbsp;&raquo; comportent des id&eacute;es auxquelles
-nous esp&eacute;rons que vous n'adh&eacute;rerez pas. Lisez <a
-href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.fr.html">Termes pr&ecirc;tant &agrave;
-confusion, que vous devriez &eacute;viter</a> pour un essai sur
-l'utilisation de ces termes. Nous avons aussi une liste de <a
-href="/philosophy/fs-translations.fr.html">traductions de &laquo;&nbsp;free
-software&nbsp;&raquo;</a> dans de nombreuses langues.
+When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
+<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
+issue is about price, not freedom.  Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
+embody opinions we hope you won't endorse.  See <a
+href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
+Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms.  We also have a list of
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
+software</q></a> into various languages.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -284,19 +271,17 @@
 </p> 
 
 <p>
-Si vous envisager d'&eacute;crire une nouvelle licence, veuillez contacter
-la FSF en &eacute;crivant &agrave; cette adresse. La prolif&eacute;ration de
-diff&eacute;rentes licences de logiciels libres implique un travail
-grandissant pour les utilisateurs dans la compr&eacute;hension des
-licences&nbsp;; nous pouvons vous aider &agrave; trouver une licence
-existante de logiciel libre qui r&eacute;ponde &agrave; vos besoins.
+If you are contemplating writing a new license, please contact the Free
+Software Foundation first by writing to that address. The proliferation of
+different free software licenses means increased work for users in
+understanding the licenses; we may be able to help you find an existing free
+software license that meets your needs.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Si ce n'est pas possible, si vous avez vraiment besoin d'une nouvelle
-licence, avec notre aide, vous pouvez vous assurer que la licence est
-vraiment une licence de logiciel libre et &eacute;viter divers
-probl&egrave;mes pratiques.
+If that isn't possible, if you really need a new license, with our help you
+can ensure that the license really is a free software license and avoid
+various practical problems.
 </p>
 
 <h2 id="beyond-software">Au-delÃ  du logiciel</h2>
@@ -347,6 +332,17 @@
 <ul>
 
 <li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.89&amp;r2=1.90";>Version
+1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
+your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
+else's development project.</li>
+
+<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.88&amp;r2=1.89";>Version
+1.89</a>: Freedom 3 includes the right to release modified versions as free
+software.</li>
+
+<li><a
 
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.79&amp;r2=1.80";>Version
 1.80</a>&nbsp;: la libertÃ© 1 doit Ãªtre pratique, pas seulement
 thÃ©orique&nbsp;; c'est-Ã -dire, pas de tivoÃ¯sation.</li>
@@ -475,7 +471,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 DerniÃ¨re mise Ã  jour&nbsp;:
 
-$Date: 2009/11/29 21:26:39 $
+$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:52 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: free-sw.sk.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.sk.html,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- free-sw.sk.html     26 Nov 2009 09:26:10 -0000      1.7
+++ free-sw.sk.html     29 Jan 2010 09:25:52 -0000      1.8
@@ -47,20 +47,20 @@
   </li>
   <li>Sloboda voÄ¾ne Å¡ÃriÅ¥ kÃ³pie a pomÃ¡haÅ¥ tak svojmu okoliu (sloboda 2).
   </li>
-  <li>Sloboda zlepÅ¡ovaÅ¥ danÃ½ program a tieto zlepÅ¡enia (vrÃ¡tane 
upravenÃ½ch alebo
-Ãºplne novÃ½ch verziÃ) Äalej zverejÅovaÅ¥, aby tak tieto zlepÅ¡enia mohli 
byÅ¥
-prÃnosom pre celÃº spoloÄnosÅ¥ (sloboda 3).  PrÃstup k zdrojovÃ©mu kÃ³du je 
k
-tomu nevyhnutnou podmienkou.
+  <li>The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others
+(freedom 3).  By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to
+benefit from your changes.  Access to the source code is a precondition for
+this.
   </li>
 </ul>
 
 <p>
-Program je slobodnÃ½m softvÃ©rom, ak uÅ¾ÃvateÄ¾om poskytuje vÅ¡etky vyÅ¡Å¡ie
-uvedenÃ© slobody.  To znamenÃ¡, Å¾e vÃ¡m musÃ byÅ¥ dovolenÃ© voÄ¾ne Å¡ÃriÅ¥ 
jeho
-kÃ³pie, Äi uÅ¾ pÃ´vodnej alebo vami upravenej verzie, Äi uÅ¾ bezplatne alebo 
za
-poplatok, a to <a href="#exportcontrol">komukoÄ¾vek kdekoÄ¾vek</a>.  MaÅ¥
-dovolenÃ© robiÅ¥ uvedenÃ© veci znamnÃ¡ (okrem inÃ©ho), Å¾e si nemusÃte od 
nikoho
-pÃ½taÅ¥ povolenie, alebo za takÃ©to povolenie niekomu platiÅ¥.
+A program is free software if users have all of these freedoms.  Thus, you
+should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without modifications,
+either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to <a
+href="#exportcontrol">anyone anywhere</a>.  Being free to do these things
+means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission
+to do so.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -72,32 +72,31 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Sloboda spÃºÅ¡Å¥aÅ¥ program znamenÃ¡, Å¾e vÅ¡etci Ä¾udia a organizÃ¡cie bez 
vÃ½nimky
-ho mÃ´Å¾u pouÅ¾ÃvaÅ¥ na Ä¾ubovoÄ¾nom type poÄÃtaÄovÃ©ho systÃ©mu, a to za 
akÃ½mkoÄ¾vek
-ÃºÄelom, bez nutnosti informovaÅ¥ o tom autora programu alebo nejakÃ½ inÃ½
-subjekt.  Pri tejto slobode je dÃ´leÅ¾itÃ½ <em>uÅ¾ÃvateÄ¾ov</em> zÃ¡mer, nie
-<em>vÃ½vojÃ¡rov</em> zÃ¡mer; vy, ako uÅ¾Ãvatelia, mÃ¡te slobodu pouÅ¾ÃvaÅ¥ 
program
-podÄ¾a vÃ¡Å¡ho Ãºmyslu a ak sa rozhodnete poskytnÃºÅ¥ ho niekomu ÄalÅ¡iemu, 
tento
-mÃ¡ potom slobodu pouÅ¾ÃvaÅ¥ ho vÃ½hradne podÄ¾a svojho vlastnÃ©ho Ãºmyslu, 
tj. vy
-nemÃ¡te nÃ¡rok vnucovaÅ¥ mu vaÅ¡e vlastnÃ© Ãºmysly.
+The freedom to run the program means the freedom for any kind of person or
+organization to use it on any kind of computer system, for any kind of
+overall job and purpose, without being required to communicate about it with
+the developer or any other specific entity.  In this freedom, it is the
+<em>user's</em> purpose that matters, not the <em>developer's</em> purpose;
+you as a user are free to run the program for your purposes, and if you
+distribute it to someone else, she is then free to run it for her purposes,
+but you are not entitled to impose your purposes on her.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Sloboda voÄ¾ne Å¡ÃriÅ¥ kÃ³pie musÃ zahÅÅaÅ¥ jednak binÃ¡rne a 
spÃºÅ¡Å¥ateÄ¾nÃ© formy
-programu a taktieÅ¾ jeho zdrojovÃ© kÃ³dy, Äi uÅ¾ ide o pÃ´vodnÃº alebo
-modifikovanÃº verziu.  (DistribÃºcia programov v spÃºÅ¡Å¥ateÄ¾nej forme je
-nevyhnutnÃ¡ pre zabezpeÄenie moÅ¾nosti pohodlnej inÅ¡talÃ¡cie slobodnÃ©ho
-operaÄnÃ©ho systÃ©mu.)  Je v poriadku, ak neexistuje spÃ´sob ako vytvoriÅ¥
-binÃ¡rnu alebo spÃºÅ¡Å¥ateÄ¾nÃº formu pre urÄitÃ½ program (nakoÄ¾ko niektorÃ© 
jazyky
-takÃºto moÅ¾nosÅ¥ nepodporujÃº), musÃ vÃ¡m byÅ¥ vÅ¡ak zaruÄenÃ¡ sloboda 
Å¡ÃriÅ¥ kÃ³pie
-v takej forme, aby bolo moÅ¾nÃ© danÃ½ program spÃºÅ¡Å¥aÅ¥.
+The freedom to redistribute copies must include binary or executable forms
+of the program, as well as source code, for both modified and unmodified
+versions.  (Distributing programs in runnable form is necessary for
+conveniently installable free operating systems.)  It is OK if there is no
+way to produce a binary or executable form for a certain program (since some
+languages don't support that feature), but you must have the freedom to
+redistribute such forms should you find or develop a way to make them.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Aby mala sloboda vykonÃ¡vaÅ¥ zmeny a Å¡ÃriÅ¥ vylepÅ¡enÃ© verzie nejakÃ½ 
zmysel,
-musÃte maÅ¥ bezpodmieneÄne prÃstup k zdrojovÃ½m kÃ³dom programu.  Z toho 
dÃ´vodu
-je voÄ¾nÃ¡ dostupnosÅ¥ zdrojovÃ½ch kÃ³dov nevyhnutnou podmienkou slobodnÃ©ho
-softvÃ©ru.
+In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
+to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
+source code of the program.  Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
+necessary condition for free software.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -112,12 +111,20 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-JednÃ½m z dÃ´leÅ¾itÃ½ch spÃ´sobov, akÃ½m je moÅ¾nÃ© program upravovaÅ¥, je 
zluÄovanie
-voÄ¾ne dostupnÃ½ch podprogramov a modulov.  Ak licencia nejakÃ©ho programu
-vravÃ, Å¾e tento nesmiete zluÄovaÅ¥ s inÃ½m vhodne licencovanÃ½m modulom,
-napr. ak sa vyÅ¾aduje, aby ste boli drÅ¾iteÄ¾om copyrightu akÃ©hokoÄ¾vek kÃ³du,
-ktorÃ½ pridÃ¡vate, potom je takÃ¡to licencia prÃliÅ¡ obmedzujÃºca na to, aby
-mohla byÅ¥ povaÅ¾ovanÃ¡ za slobodnÃº.
+One important way to modify a program is by merging in available free
+subroutines and modules.  If the program's license says that you cannot
+merge in a suitably licensed existing module &mdash; for instance, if it
+requires you to be the copyright holder of any code you add &mdash; then the
+license is too restrictive to qualify as free.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Freedom 3 includes the freedom to use release your modified versions as free
+software.  A free license may also permit other ways of releasing them; in
+other words, it does not have to be a <a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> license.  However, a license
+that requires modified versions to be nonfree does not qualify as a free
+license.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -138,14 +145,14 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-<q>âSlobodnÃ½ softvÃ©râ</q> neznamenÃ¡ <q>ânekomerÄnÃ½â.</q> 
SlobodnÃ½ program
-musÃ byÅ¥ k dispozÃcii aj na komerÄnÃ© pouÅ¾itie, komerÄnÃ½ vÃ½voj a 
komerÄnÃ©
-sÃrenie.  KomerÄnÃ½ vÃ½voj slobodnÃ©ho softvÃ©ru uÅ¾ nie je niÄÃm 
vÃ½nimoÄnÃ½m;
-takÃ½to slobodnÃ½ komerÄnÃ½ softvÃ©r je veÄ¾mi dÃ´leÅ¾itÃ½.  Za zÃskanie 
kÃ³pie
-slobodnÃ©ho softvÃ©ru ste mohli buÄ zaplatiÅ¥, alebo ste ho mohli zÃskaÅ¥
-bezplatne. AvÅ¡ak nezÃ¡visle na spÃ´sobe, akÃ½m ste svoju kÃ³piu zÃskali, 
mÃ¡te
-vÅ¾dy zaruÄenÃº slobodu tento Äalej Å¡ÃriÅ¥, upravovaÅ¥ alebo dokonca <a
-href="/philosophy/selling.html">predÃ¡vaÅ¥</a>.
+<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
+be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
+distribution.  Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
+such free commercial software is very important.  You may have paid money to
+get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
+But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to
+copy and change the software, even to <a
+href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -155,31 +162,28 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-IstÃ© pravidlÃ¡, upresÅujÃºce spÃ´sob, akÃ½m mÃ¡ byÅ¥ upravenÃ¡ verzia 
zbalenÃ¡, sÃº
-vÅ¡ak akceptovateÄ¾nÃ©, za predpokladu, Å¾e zÃ¡sadnÃ½m spÃ´sobom neobmedzujÃº 
vaÅ¡u
-slobodu na voÄ¾nÃ© Å¡Ãrenie modifikovanÃ½ch verziÃ alebo slobodu na 
vytvÃ¡ranie a
-pouÅ¾Ãvanie modifikovanÃ½ch verziÃ na sÃºkromnÃ© ÃºÄely.  PravidlÃ¡ 
urÄujÃºce, Å¾e
-<q>ak ste zverejnili vami modifikovanÃº verziu istÃ½m spÃ´sobom, musÃte ju 
tieÅ¾
-zverejniÅ¥ nejakÃ½m ÄalÅ¡Ãm Å¡pecifickÃ½m spÃ´sobom</q>, mÃ´Å¾u byÅ¥ taktieÅ¾
-akceptovateÄ¾nÃ©, za rovnakÃ©ho predpokladu.  (VÅ¡imnite si, Å¾e takÃ©to 
pravidlo
-vÃ¡m stÃ¡le ponechÃ¡va moÅ¾nosÅ¥ rozhodnÃºÅ¥ sa, si vami upravenÃº verziu 
vÃ´bec
-zverejnÃte alebo nie.)  PravidlÃ¡ vyÅ¾adujÃºce sprÃstupnenie zdrojovÃ½ch 
kÃ³dov
-uÅ¾ÃvateÄ¾om pre vÅ¡etky verzie, ktorÃ© ste zverejnili, sÃº tieÅ¾ 
akceptovateÄ¾nÃ©.
-Podobne prijateÄ¾nÃ© sÃº aj licencie, ktorÃ© vyÅ¾adujÃº, Å¾e ste povinnÃ½ 
zaslaÅ¥ na
-vyÅ¾iadanie predchÃ¡dzajÃºcemu autorovi kÃ³piu vami upravenej verzie programu,
-ak ste sa ju zaÄali Å¡ÃriÅ¥ Äalej alebo ste sa uviedli ako autor takÃ½chto
-modifikÃ¡ciÃ.
+However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
+they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately.  Rules that <q>if
+you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in
+that way also</q> can be acceptable too, on the same condition.  (Note that
+such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
+at all.)  Rules that require release of source code to the users for
+versions that you put into public use are also acceptable.  It is also
+acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
+as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
+developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-V projekte GNU pouÅ¾Ãvame <q><a
-href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a></q> ako prÃ¡vnu ochranu tÃ½chto
-slobÃ´d pre kaÅ¾dÃ©ho.  Ale <a
-href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">slobodnÃ½
-softvÃ©r bez copyleftu</a> existuje tieÅ¾.  Sme presvedÄenÃ o zÃ¡sadnÃ½ch
-dÃ´vodoch preÄo <a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html">je lepÅ¡ie pouÅ¾ÃvaÅ¥
-copyleft</a>, ale ak vÃ¡Å¡ program patrÃ medzi "necopyleftovanÃ½" slobodnÃ½
-softvÃ©r, je to v princÃpe v poriadku.
+In the GNU project, we use <q><a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a></q> to protect these freedoms
+legally for everyone.  But <a
+href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
+free software</a> also exists.  We believe there are important reasons why
+<a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html">it is better to use copyleft</a>, but
+if your program is non-copylefted free software, it is still basically
+ethical.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -200,36 +204,32 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-VÃ¤ÄÅ¡ina licenciÃ pre slobodnÃ½ softvÃ©r je zaloÅ¾enÃ½ch na copyrighte 
(autorskom
-prÃ¡ve), ktorÃ½ mÃ¡ istÃ© obmedzenia, Äo sa tÃ½ka toho, akÃ© druhy pravidiel 
mÃ´Å¾e
-predpisovaÅ¥.  Ak licencia zaloÅ¾enÃ¡ na copyrighte reÅ¡pektuje slobodu vo
-vÅ¡etkÃ½ch jej vÃ½znamoch uvedenÃ½ch vyÅ¡Å¡ie, je nepravdepodobnÃ©, Å¾e 
nastanÃº
-nejakÃ© problÃ©my, ktorÃ© sme nikdy nepredvÃdali (aj takÃ© prÃpady sa vÅ¡ak 
obÄas
-stÃ¡vajÃº).  AvÅ¡ak niektorÃ© licencie slobodnÃ©ho softvÃ©ru sÃº zaloÅ¾enÃ© na
-zmluvÃ¡ch, ktorÃ© mÃ´Å¾u predpisovaÅ¥ oveÄ¾a Å¡irÅ¡Ã zÃ¡ber moÅ¾nÃ½ch 
obmedzenÃ.  Je tu
-preto vÃ¤ÄÅ¡ia pravdepodobnosÅ¥, Å¾e takÃ¡to licencia bude prÃliÅ¡ 
obmedzujÃºca,
-aby mohla byÅ¥ uznanÃ¡ ako slobodnÃ¡.
+Most free software licenses are based on copyright, and there are limits on
+what kinds of requirements can be imposed through copyright.  If a
+copyright-based license respects freedom in the ways described above, it is
+unlikely to have some other sort of problem that we never anticipated
+(though this does happen occasionally).  However, some free software
+licenses are based on contracts, and contracts can impose a much larger
+range of possible restrictions.  That means there are many possible ways
+such a license could be unacceptably restrictive and nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Nie je moÅ¾nÃ© vypÃsaÅ¥ zoznam vÅ¡etkÃ½ch prÃpadov, ktorÃ© mÃ´Å¾u nastaÅ¥.  
Ak
-zmluvne zaloÅ¾enÃ¡ licencia obmedzuje uÅ¾ÃvateÄ¾a nejakÃ½m neobvyklÃ½m 
spÃ´sobom,
-akÃ½m licencia zaloÅ¾enÃ¡ na copyrighte nemÃ´Å¾e, a ktorÃ½ tu neuvÃ¡dzame ako
-oprÃ¡vnenÃ½, budeme sa Åou musieÅ¥ podrobnejÅ¡ie zaoberaÅ¥, ale pravdepodobne
-nebude uznanÃ¡ ako slobodnÃ¡.
+We can't possibly list all the ways that might happen.  If a contract-based
+license restricts the user in an unusual way that copyright-based licenses
+cannot, and which isn't mentioned here as legitimate, we will have to think
+about it, and we will probably conclude it is nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-KeÄ hovorÃme o slobodnom softvÃ©ri, mali by sme sa vyhÃ½baÅ¥ pojmom ako
-<q>darovaÅ¥</q> alebo <q>daÅ¥ zadarmo,</q> pretoÅ¾e tieto pojmy navodzujÃº
-dojem, Å¾e sa jednÃ¡ o cenu softvÃ©ru a nie o jeho slobodu.  NiektorÃ© beÅ¾ne
-pouÅ¾ÃvanÃ© pojmy ako napr. <q>pirÃ¡tstvo</q> predstavujÃº nÃ¡zory, ktorÃ©,
-dÃºfame, neschvaÄ¾ujete .  Pozrite si zoznam <a
-href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">zavÃ¡dzajÃºcich slov a vÃ½razov, ktorÃ½m
-sa odporÃºÄame vyhnÃºÅ¥,</a> kde nÃ¡jdete bliÅ¾Å¡ie vysvetlenie a diskusiu k 
tejto
-problematike.  MÃ¡me tieÅ¾ zoznam <a
-href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">prekladov vÃ½razu <q>slobodnÃ½
-softvÃ©r</q></a> do rÃ´znych jazykov.
+When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
+<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
+issue is about price, not freedom.  Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
+embody opinions we hope you won't endorse.  See <a
+href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
+Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms.  We also have a list of
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
+software</q></a> into various languages.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -257,17 +257,17 @@
 </p> 
 
 <p>
-Ak uvaÅ¾ujete nad tÃ½m, Å¾e napÃÅ¡ete vlastnÃº novÃº licenciu, kontaktujte 
prosÃm
-FSF na uvedenej adrese.  Å Ãrenie rÃ´znych druhov licenciÃ slobodnÃ©ho 
softvÃ©ru
-predstavuje zvÃ½Å¡enÃº zÃ¡Å¥aÅ¾ pre uÅ¾ÃvateÄ¾ov pri ich snahe porozumieÅ¥ 
presne
-danej licencii; je moÅ¾nÃ©, Å¾e vÃ¡m budeme vedieÅ¥ pomÃ´cÅ¥ nÃ¡jsÅ¥ nejakÃº 
uÅ¾
-existujÃºcu licenciu slobodnÃ©ho softvÃ©ru, ktorÃ¡ by spÄºÅala vaÅ¡e potreby.
+If you are contemplating writing a new license, please contact the Free
+Software Foundation first by writing to that address. The proliferation of
+different free software licenses means increased work for users in
+understanding the licenses; we may be able to help you find an existing free
+software license that meets your needs.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Ak by to nebolo moÅ¾nÃ© a vy by ste skutoÄne potrebovali novÃº licenciu,
-vyuÅ¾itÃm naÅ¡ej pomoci si zabezpeÄÃte, Å¾e vaÅ¡a novÃ¡ licencia bude 
skutoÄne
-slobodnÃ¡ a vyhnete sa rÃ´znym praktickÃ½m problÃ©mom.
+If that isn't possible, if you really need a new license, with our help you
+can ensure that the license really is a free software license and avoid
+various practical problems.
 </p>
 
 <h2 id="beyond-software">Okrem softvÃ©ru</h2>
@@ -312,6 +312,17 @@
 <ul>
 
 <li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.89&amp;r2=1.90";>Version
+1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
+your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
+else's development project.</li>
+
+<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.88&amp;r2=1.89";>Version
+1.89</a>: Freedom 3 includes the right to release modified versions as free
+software.</li>
+
+<li><a
 
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.79&amp;r2=1.80";>Verzia
 1.80</a>: Sloboda 1 musÃ byÅ¥ praktickÃ¡, nielen teoretickÃ¡; napr. Å¾iadna
 tivoizÃ¡cia.</li>
@@ -438,7 +449,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 AktualizovanÃ©:
 
-$Date: 2009/11/26 09:26:10 $
+$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:52 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: free-sw.sr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.sr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- free-sw.sr.html     26 Nov 2009 09:26:10 -0000      1.22
+++ free-sw.sr.html     29 Jan 2010 09:25:52 -0000      1.23
@@ -48,19 +48,20 @@
   <li>Ð¡Ð»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ñ ÑÐ°ÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð´ÐµÑÐ¸Ð²Ð°ÑÐ° Ð¿ÑÐ¸Ð¼ÐµÑÐ°ÐºÐ° 
Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð°, ÐºÐ°ÐºÐ¾ Ð±Ð¸ÑÑÐµ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ð»Ð¸ Ð´Ð° Ð¿Ð¾Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ð½ÐµÑÐµ
 Ð±Ð»Ð¸Ð¶ÑÐµÐ¼ (ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð° Ð±ÑÐ¾Ñ 2).
   </li>
-  <li>The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements (and
-modified versions in general)  to the public, so that the whole community
-benefits (freedom 3).  Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
+  <li>The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others
+(freedom 3).  By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to
+benefit from your changes.  Access to the source code is a precondition for
+this.
   </li>
 </ul>
 
 <p>
-ÐÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼ ÑÐµ ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð°Ð½ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐ²ÐµÑ ÑÐºÐ¾Ð»Ð¸ÐºÐ¾ ÑÐµ 
ÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¸ÑÐ½Ð¸ÑÐ¸Ð¼Ð° Ð¿ÑÑÐ¶Ð°ÑÑ ÑÐ²Ðµ Ð¾Ð²Ðµ
-ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ðµ. ÐÐ° ÑÐ°Ñ Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð½, Ð´Ð¾Ð·Ð²Ð¾ÑÐµÐ½Ð¾ Ð²Ð°Ð¼ ÑÐµ Ð´Ð° 
ÑÐ°ÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð´ÐµÑÑÑÐµÑÐµ Ð¿ÑÐ¸Ð¼ÐµÑÐºÐµ, ÑÐ° Ð¸Ð»Ð¸
-Ð±ÐµÐ· Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÐ½Ð°, Ð±ÐµÑÐ¿Ð»Ð°ÑÐ½Ð¾ Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ ÑÐ· Ð½Ð°Ð¿Ð»Ð°ÑÑ 
ÑÐ°ÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð´ÐµÑÐ¸Ð²Ð°ÑÐ°, <a
-href="#exportcontrol">ÑÐ²Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ðµ, Ð¸ Ð±Ð¸Ð»Ð¾ Ð³Ð´Ðµ</a>. ÐÐ¼Ð°ÑÐ¸ 
ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ñ Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ ÑÐ¾ ÑÐ¸Ð½Ð¸
-Ð·Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸ (Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÑÑ Ð¾ÑÑÐ°Ð»Ð¾Ð³) Ð´Ð° Ð·Ð° ÑÐ¾ Ð½Ðµ Ð¼Ð¾ÑÐ°ÑÐµ Ð´Ð° 
ÑÑÐ°Ð¶Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð´Ð¾Ð·Ð²Ð¾Ð»Ñ Ð½Ð¸ÑÐ¸ Ð´Ð° Ð·Ð° ÑÑ
-Ð¿Ð»Ð°ÑÐ°ÑÐµ.
+A program is free software if users have all of these freedoms.  Thus, you
+should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without modifications,
+either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to <a
+href="#exportcontrol">anyone anywhere</a>.  Being free to do these things
+means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission
+to do so.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -71,30 +72,31 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Ð¡Ð»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð° ÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐµÑÐ° Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð° Ð¿ÑÐµÐ´ÑÑÐ°Ð²ÑÐ° 
Ð´Ð¾Ð·Ð²Ð¾Ð»Ñ ÑÐ²Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ñ Ð¾ÑÐ¾Ð±Ð¸ Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ Ð¾ÑÐ³Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ð·Ð°ÑÐ¸ÑÐ¸
-Ð´Ð° Ð³Ð° ÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐ¸ Ð½Ð° Ð±Ð¸Ð»Ð¾ ÐºÐ°ÐºÐ²Ð¾Ñ Ð²ÑÑÑÐ¸ 
ÑÐ°ÑÑÐ½Ð°ÑÑÐºÐ¾Ð³ ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐµÐ¼Ð°, Ð·Ð° Ð±Ð¸Ð»Ð¾ ÐºÐ¾ÑÑ Ð²ÑÑÑÑ
-Ð¿Ð¾ÑÐ»Ð°, Ð¸ Ð±ÐµÐ· Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ±Ðµ Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÐ¾Ð¼ Ð¾Ð±ÑÐ°ÑÐ¸ 
Ð³ÑÐ°Ð´Ð¸ÑÐµÑÑ Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ Ð±Ð¸Ð»Ð¾ ÐºÐ°ÐºÐ²Ð¾Ð¼ Ð´ÑÑÐ³Ð¾Ð¼
-ÑÐµÐ»Ñ. ÐÐ° Ð¾Ð²Ñ ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ñ ÑÐµ Ð±Ð¸ÑÐ½Ð° Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ±Ð° 
<em>ÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¸ÑÐ½Ð¸ÐºÐ°</em>, Ð° Ð½Ðµ
-<em>Ð³ÑÐ°Ð´Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐ°</em>. ÐÐ¸ ÑÑÐµ ÐºÐ°Ð¾ ÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¸ÑÐ½Ð¸Ðº 
ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¸ Ð´Ð° Ð¿Ð¾ÐºÑÐµÑÐµÑÐµ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼ Ð·Ð°
-Ð²Ð°ÑÐµ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ±Ðµ, Ð° ÑÐºÐ¾Ð»Ð¸ÐºÐ¾ Ð³Ð° ÑÐ°ÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð´ÐµÑÑÑÐµÑÐµ 
Ð½ÐµÐºÐ¾Ð¼ Ð´ÑÑÐ³Ð¾Ð¼, Ð¾Ð½ ÑÐµ ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð°Ð½ Ð´Ð° Ð³Ð°
-Ð¿Ð¾ÐºÑÐµÑÐµ Ð·Ð° ÑÐµÐ³Ð¾Ð²Ðµ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ±Ðµ, Ð°Ð»Ð¸ Ð¼Ñ Ð²Ð¸ Ð½Ðµ 
Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑÐµ Ð½Ð°Ð¼ÐµÑÐ½ÑÑÐ¸ Ð²Ð°ÑÐµ.
+The freedom to run the program means the freedom for any kind of person or
+organization to use it on any kind of computer system, for any kind of
+overall job and purpose, without being required to communicate about it with
+the developer or any other specific entity.  In this freedom, it is the
+<em>user's</em> purpose that matters, not the <em>developer's</em> purpose;
+you as a user are free to run the program for your purposes, and if you
+distribute it to someone else, she is then free to run it for her purposes,
+but you are not entitled to impose your purposes on her.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Ð¡Ð»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð° ÑÐ°ÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ»Ðµ Ð¿ÑÐ¸Ð¼ÐµÑÐ°ÐºÐ° Ð¼Ð¾ÑÐ° Ð´Ð° 
ÑÐºÑÑÑÑÑÐµ Ð±Ð¸Ð½Ð°ÑÐ½Ðµ Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ Ð¸Ð·Ð²ÑÑÐ½Ðµ Ð¾Ð±Ð»Ð¸ÐºÐµ
-Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð°, Ð°Ð»Ð¸ Ð¸ Ð¸Ð·Ð²Ð¾ÑÐ½Ð¸ ÐºÐ¾Ð´, ÐºÐ°ÐºÐ¾ Ð·Ð° 
Ð½ÐµÐ¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ðµ, ÑÐ°ÐºÐ¾ Ð¸ Ð·Ð° Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ðµ Ð²ÐµÑÐ·Ð¸ÑÐµ
-Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð°. (Ð Ð°ÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ»Ð° Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð° Ñ Ð¸Ð·Ð²ÑÑÐ½Ð¾Ð¼ 
Ð¾Ð±Ð»Ð¸ÐºÑ ÑÐµ Ð½ÐµÐ¾Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð´Ð½Ð° Ð·Ð° Ð·Ð³Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¾
-Ð¸Ð½ÑÑÐ°Ð»Ð¸ÑÐ°ÑÐµ ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÐµÑÐ°ÑÐ¸Ð²Ð½Ð¸Ñ 
ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐµÐ¼Ð°.) Ð£ ÑÐµÐ´Ñ ÑÐµ ÑÐºÐ¾Ð»Ð¸ÐºÐ¾ Ð½Ðµ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐ¾ÑÐ¸
-Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð½ Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ Ð·Ð° Ð¾Ð´ÑÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼ ÑÑÐ²Ð¾ÑÐ¸ 
Ð±Ð¸Ð½Ð°ÑÐ½Ð¸ Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ Ð¸Ð·Ð²ÑÑÐ½Ð¸ Ð¾Ð±Ð»Ð¸Ðº, ÑÐµÑ
-Ð¸Ð·Ð²ÐµÑÐ½Ð¸ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼ÑÐºÐ¸ ÑÐµÐ·Ð¸ÑÐ¸ ÑÐ°ÐºÐ¾ Ð½ÐµÑÑÐ¾ Ð½Ðµ 
Ð¿Ð¾Ð´ÑÐ¶Ð°Ð²Ð°ÑÑ, Ð°Ð»Ð¸ Ð¼Ð¾ÑÐ° Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐ¾ÑÐ°ÑÐ¸
-ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð° ÑÐ°ÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ»Ðµ ÑÐ°ÐºÐ²Ð¸Ñ Ð¾Ð±Ð»Ð¸ÐºÐ° ÑÐºÐ¾Ð»Ð¸ÐºÐ¾ 
Ð¸Ð·Ð¼Ð¸ÑÐ»Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ Ð¸Ð·Ð³ÑÐ°Ð´Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð½ Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ
-Ð¾Ð½Ð¸ Ð½Ð°Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ðµ.
+The freedom to redistribute copies must include binary or executable forms
+of the program, as well as source code, for both modified and unmodified
+versions.  (Distributing programs in runnable form is necessary for
+conveniently installable free operating systems.)  It is OK if there is no
+way to produce a binary or executable form for a certain program (since some
+languages don't support that feature), but you must have the freedom to
+redistribute such forms should you find or develop a way to make them.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÐÐ° Ð±Ð¸ ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ðµ Ð¼ÐµÑÐ°ÑÐ° Ð¸ Ð¾Ð±ÑÐ°Ð²ÑÐ¸Ð²Ð°ÑÐ° 
Ð¿Ð¾Ð±Ð¾ÑÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð²ÐµÑÐ·Ð¸ÑÐ° Ð¸Ð¼Ð°Ð»Ðµ ÑÐ¼Ð¸ÑÐ»Ð°, Ð¼Ð¾ÑÐ°
-Ð±Ð¸ÑÐ¸ Ð¾Ð±ÐµÐ·Ð±ÐµÑÐµÐ½ Ð¿ÑÐ¸ÑÑÑÐ¿ Ð¸Ð·Ð²Ð¾ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð¼ ÐºÐ¾Ð´Ñ 
Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð°. Ð¡ÑÐ¾Ð³Ð° ÑÐµ Ð½ÐµÐ¾Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð´Ð°Ð½ ÑÑÐ»Ð¾Ð² Ð·Ð°
-Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐ¾ÑÐ°ÑÐµ ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¾Ð³ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐ²ÐµÑÐ° Ð´Ð¾ÑÑÑÐ¿Ð½Ð¾ÑÑ 
Ð¸Ð·Ð²Ð¾ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð³ ÐºÐ¾Ð´Ð°.
+In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
+to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
+source code of the program.  Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
+necessary condition for free software.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -111,9 +113,18 @@
 <p>
 One important way to modify a program is by merging in available free
 subroutines and modules.  If the program's license says that you cannot
-merge in a suitably-licensed existing module, such as if it requires you to
-be the copyright holder of any code you add, then the license is too
-restrictive to qualify as free.
+merge in a suitably licensed existing module &mdash; for instance, if it
+requires you to be the copyright holder of any code you add &mdash; then the
+license is too restrictive to qualify as free.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Freedom 3 includes the freedom to use release your modified versions as free
+software.  A free license may also permit other ways of releasing them; in
+other words, it does not have to be a <a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> license.  However, a license
+that requires modified versions to be nonfree does not qualify as a free
+license.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -134,8 +145,8 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>non-commercial.</q> A free program
-must be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
+<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
+be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
 distribution.  Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
 such free commercial software is very important.  You may have paid money to
 get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
@@ -159,9 +170,9 @@
 such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
 at all.)  Rules that require release of source code to the users for
 versions that you put into public use are also acceptable.  It is also
-acceptable for the license to require that, if you have distributed a
-modified version and a previous developer asks for a copy of it, you must
-send one, or that you identify yourself on your modifications.
+acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
+as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
+developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -170,7 +181,7 @@
 legally for everyone.  But <a
 href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
 free software</a> also exists.  We believe there are important reasons why
-<a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html"> it is better to use copyleft</a>, but
+<a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html">it is better to use copyleft</a>, but
 if your program is non-copylefted free software, it is still basically
 ethical.
 </p>
@@ -194,35 +205,32 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÐÐµÑÐ¸Ð½Ð° ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐ²ÐµÑÑÐºÐ¸Ñ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÐ¸ ÑÐµ 
Ð·Ð°ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð° Ð½Ð° ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐµÐ¼Ñ Ð°ÑÑÐ¾ÑÑÐºÐ¸Ñ
-Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°, Ð¿Ð° Ð·Ð°ÑÐ¾ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐ¾ÑÐµ Ð¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐ° Ð²ÑÑÑÐ° 
ÑÑÐ»Ð¾Ð²Ð° ÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¸ ÐºÑÐ¾Ð· ÑÐ°Ñ ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐµÐ¼ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ñ Ð´Ð°
-ÑÐµ Ð½Ð°Ð¼ÐµÑÐ½Ñ. Ð£ÐºÐ¾Ð»Ð¸ÐºÐ¾ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÐ° Ð·Ð°ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð° Ð½Ð° 
ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐµÐ¼Ñ Ð°ÑÑÐ¾ÑÑÐºÐ¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð° Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÑÑÐµ
-ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ñ Ð½Ð° Ð³Ð¾ÑÐµÐ¾Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð½Ðµ Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð½Ðµ, Ð¼Ð°Ð»Ð¾ ÑÐµ 
Ð²ÐµÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°ÑÐ½Ð¾ Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ ÑÐµ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÐ°Ð²Ð¸ÑÐ¸ Ð½ÐµÐºÐ°
-Ð´ÑÑÐ³Ð° Ð²ÑÑÑÐ° Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±Ð»ÐµÐ¼Ð° ÐºÐ¾ÑÑ Ð½Ð¸ÑÐ¼Ð¾ Ð¾ÑÐµÐºÐ¸Ð²Ð°Ð»Ð¸ 
(Ð¸Ð°ÐºÐ¾ ÑÐµ Ð¸ ÑÐ¾ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÐµÐºÐ°Ð´
-Ð´ÐµÑÐ°Ð²Ð°). ÐÐµÑÑÑÐ¸Ð¼, Ð½ÐµÐºÐµ Ð¾Ð´ ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¸Ñ 
ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐ²ÐµÑÑÐºÐ¸Ñ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÐ¸ ÑÑ Ð·Ð°ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ðµ Ð½Ð°
-ÑÐ³Ð¾Ð²Ð¾ÑÐ¸Ð¼Ð°, Ð° ÑÐ³Ð¾Ð²Ð¾ÑÐ¸ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ñ Ð´Ð° Ð½Ð°Ð¼ÐµÑÐ½Ñ Ð¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ 
ÑÐ¸ÑÐ¸ Ð´Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð¿Ð°Ð·Ð¾Ð½ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³ÑÑÐ¸Ñ
-Ð¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐ°. Ð¢Ð¾ Ð·Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸ Ð´Ð° Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐ¾ÑÐµ Ð¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¸ 
Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð½Ð¸ Ð½Ð° ÐºÐ¾ÑÐµ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÐ° Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ðµ Ð´Ð° Ð±ÑÐ´Ðµ
-Ð½ÐµÐ¿ÑÐ¸ÑÐ²Ð°ÑÑÐ¸Ð²Ð¾ Ð¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°ÑÑÑÐ° Ð¸ 
Ð½ÐµÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð°.
+Most free software licenses are based on copyright, and there are limits on
+what kinds of requirements can be imposed through copyright.  If a
+copyright-based license respects freedom in the ways described above, it is
+unlikely to have some other sort of problem that we never anticipated
+(though this does happen occasionally).  However, some free software
+licenses are based on contracts, and contracts can impose a much larger
+range of possible restrictions.  That means there are many possible ways
+such a license could be unacceptably restrictive and nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÐÐ¸ÐºÐ°ÐºÐ¾ Ð½Ðµ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÐ¼Ð¾ Ð´Ð° Ð½Ð°Ð²ÐµÐ´ÐµÐ¼Ð¾ ÑÐ²Ðµ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³ÑÑÐµ 
Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð½Ðµ Ð½Ð° ÐºÐ¾ÑÐµ ÑÐµ ÑÐ¾ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³ÑÑÐµ Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ
-Ð´Ð¾Ð³Ð¾Ð´Ð¸. Ð£ÐºÐ¾Ð»Ð¸ÐºÐ¾ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÐ° Ð·Ð°ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð° Ð½Ð° 
ÑÐ³Ð¾Ð²Ð¾ÑÑ Ð¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð²Ð° ÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¸ÑÐ½Ð¸ÐºÐ° Ð½Ð°
-Ð½ÐµÑÐ¾Ð±Ð¸ÑÐ°ÑÐµÐ½ Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð½ (Ð½Ð° ÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¸ ÑÐ¾ Ð½Ðµ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ñ 
Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÐµ Ð·Ð°ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ðµ Ð½Ð° ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐµÐ¼Ñ Ð°ÑÑÐ¾ÑÑÐºÐ¸Ñ
-Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°), Ð° ÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¸ Ð½Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð¾Ð²Ð´Ðµ Ð½Ð°Ð²ÐµÐ´ÐµÐ½ ÐºÐ°Ð¾ 
Ð»ÐµÐ³Ð¸ÑÐ¸Ð¼Ð°Ð½, Ð¼Ð¾ÑÐ°ÑÐµÐ¼Ð¾ Ð´Ð° Ð¾ ÑÐ¾Ð¼Ðµ
-ÑÐ°Ð·Ð¼Ð¸ÑÐ»Ð¸Ð¼Ð¾, Ð¸ Ð²ÐµÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°ÑÐ½Ð¾ ÑÐµÐ¼Ð¾ Ð¾Ð´Ð»ÑÑÐ¸ÑÐ¸ Ð´Ð° 
Ð´Ð¾ÑÐ¸ÑÐ½Ð° Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÐ° Ð½Ð¸ÑÐµ ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð°.
+We can't possibly list all the ways that might happen.  If a contract-based
+license restricts the user in an unusual way that copyright-based licenses
+cannot, and which isn't mentioned here as legitimate, we will have to think
+about it, and we will probably conclude it is nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÐÐ°Ð´Ð° Ð³Ð¾Ð²Ð¾ÑÐ¸ÑÐµ Ð¾ ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¾Ð¼ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐ²ÐµÑÑ, 
Ð½Ð°ÑÐ±Ð¾ÑÐµ ÑÐµ Ð´Ð° Ð¸Ð·Ð±ÐµÐ³Ð°Ð²Ð°ÑÐµ Ð¸Ð·ÑÐ°Ð·Ðµ ÐºÐ°Ð¾ ÑÑÐ¾
-ÑÑ âÐ½Ð° Ð¿Ð¾ÐºÐ»Ð¾Ð½â (ÐµÐ½Ð³Ð». <em>give away</em>) Ð¸Ð»Ð¸ 
âÐ±ÐµÑÐ¿Ð»Ð°ÑÐ½Ð¾â (ÐµÐ½Ð³Ð». <em>for
-free</em>), ÑÐµÑ ÑÐ°ÐºÐ²Ð¸ Ð¸Ð·ÑÐ°Ð·Ð¸ ÑÐ¿ÑÑÑÑÑ Ð½Ð° ÑÐ¾ Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ 
Ð½Ðµ ÑÐ°Ð´Ð¸ Ð¾ ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð¸, Ð²ÐµÑ
-ÑÐµÐ½Ð¸. Ð Ð½ÐµÐºÐ¸ Ð´ÑÑÐ³Ð¸ ÑÐµÑÑÐ¸ Ð¸Ð·ÑÐ°Ð·Ð¸, ÐºÐ°Ð¾ ÑÑÐ¾ ÑÐµ 
âÐ¿Ð¸ÑÐ°ÑÐµÑÐ¸ÑÐ°â, Ð¾Ð»Ð¸ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°ÑÑ ÑÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾Ð²Ðµ
-ÐºÐ¾ÑÐµ ÑÐµ, Ð½Ð°Ð´Ð°Ð¼Ð¾ ÑÐµ, Ð²Ð¸ Ð½ÐµÑÐµÑÐµ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´ÑÐ¶Ð°ÑÐ¸. 
ÐÐ¾Ð³Ð»ÐµÐ´Ð°ÑÑÐµ <a
-href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.sr.html">ÐÐ±ÑÑÑÑÑÑÐµ ÑÐµÑÐ¸ Ð¸ 
ÑÐ¸Ð½ÑÐ°Ð³Ð¼Ðµ ÐºÐ¾ÑÐµ
-Ð²ÑÐµÐ´Ð¸ Ð¸Ð·Ð±ÐµÐ³Ð°Ð²Ð°ÑÐ¸</a>, Ð³Ð´Ðµ ÑÐµ Ð³Ð¾Ð²Ð¾ÑÐ¸ Ð¾ ÑÐ°ÐºÐ²Ð¸Ð¼ 
Ð¸Ð·ÑÐ°Ð·Ð¸Ð¼Ð°. Ð¢Ð°ÐºÐ¾ÑÐµ, Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐ¾ÑÐ¸ Ð¸
-ÑÐ¿Ð¸ÑÐ°Ðº <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.sr.html">Ð¿ÑÐµÐ²Ð¾Ð´Ð° 
Ð¸Ð·ÑÐ°Ð·Ð°
-âÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¸ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐ²ÐµÑâ</a> Ð½Ð° ÑÐ°Ð·Ð½Ðµ ÑÐµÐ·Ð¸ÐºÐµ.
+When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
+<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
+issue is about price, not freedom.  Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
+embody opinions we hope you won't endorse.  See <a
+href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
+Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms.  We also have a list of
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
+software</q></a> into various languages.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -249,17 +257,17 @@
 </p> 
 
 <p>
-Ð£ÐºÐ¾Ð»Ð¸ÐºÐ¾ Ð½Ð°Ð¼ÐµÑÐ°Ð²Ð°ÑÐµ Ð´Ð° Ð½Ð°Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐµ Ð½Ð¾Ð²Ñ 
Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÑ, Ð¼Ð¾Ð»Ð¸Ð¼Ð¾ Ð²Ð°Ñ Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ Ð¾Ð±ÑÐ°ÑÐ¸ÑÐµ ÐÐ¡Ð¡-Ñ
-Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐ¼Ð¾Ð¼ Ð½Ð° Ð¿ÑÐµÑÑÐ¾Ð´Ð½Ñ Ð°Ð´ÑÐµÑÑ. Ð£Ð²ÐµÑÐ°Ð²Ð°ÑÐµ 
Ð±ÑÐ¾ÑÐ° ÑÐ°Ð·Ð»Ð¸ÑÐ¸ÑÐ¸Ñ ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐ²ÐµÑÑÐºÐ¸Ñ
-Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÐ¸ Ð·Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸ Ð´Ð° ÑÐµ ÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¸ÑÐ½Ð¸ÑÐ¸ Ð¿ÑÐ¸ ÑÑÐ²Ð°ÑÐ°ÑÑ 
Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÐ¸ Ð¸Ð¼Ð°ÑÐ¸ Ð²Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÐ»Ð°. ÐÐ¾Ð¶Ð´Ð°
-ÑÐµÐ¼Ð¾ Ð±Ð¸ÑÐ¸ Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³ÑÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÑÐ¸ Ð´Ð° Ð²Ð°Ð¼ Ð¿Ð¾Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ð½ÐµÐ¼Ð¾ Ð´Ð° 
Ð¸ÑÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐ¸ÑÐµ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐ¾ÑÐµÑÑ ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ñ
-ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐ²ÐµÑÑÐºÑ Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÑ ÐºÐ¾ÑÐ° ÑÐµ Ð¾Ð´Ð³Ð¾Ð²Ð°ÑÐ°ÑÐ¸ 
Ð²Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð¼ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ±Ð°Ð¼Ð°.
+If you are contemplating writing a new license, please contact the Free
+Software Foundation first by writing to that address. The proliferation of
+different free software licenses means increased work for users in
+understanding the licenses; we may be able to help you find an existing free
+software license that meets your needs.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Ð£ÐºÐ¾Ð»Ð¸ÐºÐ¾ ÑÐ°ÐºÐ¾ Ð½ÐµÑÑÐ¾ Ð½Ð¸ÑÐµ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³ÑÑÐµ, Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¾ÑÐ½Ð¾ 
ÑÐºÐ¾Ð»Ð¸ÐºÐ¾ Ð²Ð°Ð¼ ÑÐµ Ð·Ð°Ð¸ÑÑÐ° Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ±Ð½Ð° Ð½Ð¾Ð²Ð°
-Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÐ°, ÑÐ· Ð½Ð°ÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾Ð¼Ð¾Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑÐµ Ð¾ÑÐ¸Ð³ÑÑÐ°ÑÐ¸ Ð´Ð° 
Ð²Ð°ÑÐ° Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÐ° Ð±ÑÐ´Ðµ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð° ÑÐ»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð°
-ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐ²ÐµÑÑÐºÐ° Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½ÑÐ° Ð¸ Ð¸Ð·Ð±ÐµÑÐ¸ ÑÐ°Ð·Ð½Ðµ 
Ð¿ÑÐ°ÐºÑÐ¸ÑÐ½Ðµ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±Ð»ÐµÐ¼Ðµ.
+If that isn't possible, if you really need a new license, with our help you
+can ensure that the license really is a free software license and avoid
+various practical problems.
 </p>
 
 <h2 id="beyond-software">ÐÐ¸ÑÐµ Ð¾Ð´ ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐ²ÐµÑÐ°</h2>
@@ -304,6 +312,17 @@
 <ul>
 
 <li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.89&amp;r2=1.90";>Version
+1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
+your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
+else's development project.</li>
+
+<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.88&amp;r2=1.89";>Version
+1.89</a>: Freedom 3 includes the right to release modified versions as free
+software.</li>
+
+<li><a
 
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.79&amp;r2=1.80";>Version
 1.80</a>: Freedom 1 must be practical, not just theoretical; i.e., no
 tivoization.</li>
@@ -435,7 +454,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 ÐÐ¶ÑÑÐ¸ÑÐ°Ð½Ð¾:
 
-$Date: 2009/11/26 09:26:10 $
+$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:52 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: free-sw.tr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.tr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -b -r1.23 -r1.24
--- free-sw.tr.html     26 Nov 2009 09:26:10 -0000      1.23
+++ free-sw.tr.html     29 Jan 2010 09:25:52 -0000      1.24
@@ -45,20 +45,20 @@
   <li>KopyalarÄ± daÄÄ±tma Ã¶zgÃ¼rlÃ¼ÄÃ¼. BÃ¶ylece komÅunuza yardÄ±m 
edebilirsiniz (2
 numaralÄ± Ã¶zgÃ¼rlÃ¼k).
   </li>
-  <li>TÃ¼m toplumun yarar saÄlayabileceÄi Åekilde programÄ± geliÅtirme ve
-geliÅtirdiklerinizi (ve genel olarak deÄiÅtirilmiÅ sÃ¼rÃ¼mlerini) 
yayÄ±nlama
-Ã¶zgÃ¼rlÃ¼ÄÃ¼ (3 numaralÄ± Ã¶zgÃ¼rlÃ¼k). Kaynak koduna eriÅmek, bunun iÃ§in 
bir
-Ã¶nkoÅuldur.
+  <li>The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others
+(freedom 3).  By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to
+benefit from your changes.  Access to the source code is a precondition for
+this.
   </li>
 </ul>
 
 <p>
-Bir program, eÄer kullanÄ±cÄ±larÄ± bu Ã¶zgÃ¼rlÃ¼klere sahipse Ã¶zgÃ¼r
-yazÄ±lÄ±mdÄ±r. Yani, kopyalarÄ±nÄ± deÄiÅtirerek ya da deÄiÅtirmeden, 
Ã¼cretli ya
-da Ã¼cretsiz, <a href="#exportcontrol">herhangi bir yerdeki herhangi
-birine</a> daÄÄ±tmaya serbest olmalÄ±sÄ±nÄ±z. ÃzgÃ¼r olmak demek (bu 
meyanda),
-tÃ¼m bunlarÄ± yapmak iÃ§in izin istemek ya da izin iÃ§in Ã¶deme yapmak zorunda
-olmamanÄ±z demektir.
+A program is free software if users have all of these freedoms.  Thus, you
+should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without modifications,
+either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to <a
+href="#exportcontrol">anyone anywhere</a>.  Being free to do these things
+means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission
+to do so.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -68,32 +68,31 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Bir programÄ± kullanma Ã¶zgÃ¼rlÃ¼ÄÃ¼ demek, onu, herhangi bir bireyin ya da
-kurumun, herhangi bir bilgisayar sistemi Ã¼zerinde, herhangi bir iÅ iÃ§in
-geliÅtirici ya da bir baÅka Åey ile iletiÅim kurmak zorunluluÄu olmadan
-kullanabilmek demektir. Bu Ã¶zgÃ¼rlÃ¼kte <em>kullanÄ±cÄ±nÄ±n</em> amacÄ± 
Ã¶nemlidir,
-<em>geliÅtiricininki</em> deÄil; Sen, bir kullanÄ±cÄ± olarak kendi 
amaÃ§larÄ±n
-iÃ§in bir programÄ± Ã§alÄ±ÅtÄ±rmaya Ã¶zgÃ¼rsÃ¼n ve eÄer bir baÅkasÄ±na 
daÄÄ±tÄ±rsan, o
-da kendi amaÃ§larÄ± iÃ§in programÄ± Ã§alÄ±ÅtÄ±rmaya Ã¶zgÃ¼rdÃ¼r, ama kendi 
amaÃ§larÄ±nÄ±z
-iÃ§in onu zorlayamazsÄ±nÄ±z.
+The freedom to run the program means the freedom for any kind of person or
+organization to use it on any kind of computer system, for any kind of
+overall job and purpose, without being required to communicate about it with
+the developer or any other specific entity.  In this freedom, it is the
+<em>user's</em> purpose that matters, not the <em>developer's</em> purpose;
+you as a user are free to run the program for your purposes, and if you
+distribute it to someone else, she is then free to run it for her purposes,
+but you are not entitled to impose your purposes on her.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ProgramÄ±n kopyalarÄ±nÄ±n daÄÄ±tÄ±mÄ± Ã¶zgÃ¼rlÃ¼ÄÃ¼, programÄ±n hem 
deÄiÅtirilmiÅ hem
-de deÄiÅtirilmemiÅ, kaynak kodunda olduÄu gibi ikili veya 
Ã§alÄ±ÅtÄ±rÄ±labilir
-halini iÃ§ermesi zorunludur. (ProgramlarÄ± Ã§alÄ±ÅtÄ±rÄ±labilir halleri ile
-daÄÄ±tmak kolayca yÃ¼klenebilen Ã¶zgÃ¼r iÅletim sistemleri iÃ§in gerekiyor) 
EÄer,
-belli bir yazÄ±lÄ±mÄ±n ikili ya da Ã§alÄ±ÅtÄ±rÄ±labilir bir biÃ§imini 
oluÅturmak
-olanaksÄ±zsa (ki bazÄ± diller bu Ã¶zelliÄi desteklemiyor), o zaman sorun yok;
-ancak, program, bu biÃ§imlerden herhangi birine sokmanÄ±n bir yolunu
-bulduÄunuzda, programÄ± yeniden daÄÄ±tmaya hakkÄ±nÄ±zÄ±n olmasÄ± gerekir.
+The freedom to redistribute copies must include binary or executable forms
+of the program, as well as source code, for both modified and unmodified
+versions.  (Distributing programs in runnable form is necessary for
+conveniently installable free operating systems.)  It is OK if there is no
+way to produce a binary or executable form for a certain program (since some
+languages don't support that feature), but you must have the freedom to
+redistribute such forms should you find or develop a way to make them.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-DeÄiÅiklikler yapma ve geliÅtirilmiÅ sÃ¼rÃ¼mlerini yayÄ±mlama 
Ã¶zgÃ¼rlÃ¼klerine
-sahip olabilmek iÃ§in, mantÄ±klÄ± olmak iÃ§in programÄ±n kaynak kodlarÄ±na
-eriÅmeniz zorunludur. Bu nedenle, kaynak koda eriÅim, Ã¶zgÃ¼r yazÄ±lÄ±m iÃ§in
-gerekli bir durumdur.
+In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the freedom
+to publish improved versions) to be meaningful, you must have access to the
+source code of the program.  Therefore, accessibility of source code is a
+necessary condition for free software.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -108,11 +107,20 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Bir program Ã¼zerinde deÄiÅiklik yapmanÄ±n Ã¶nemli yollarÄ±ndan biri de, 
mevcut
-Ã¶zgÃ¼r altyordam ve modÃ¼lleri birleÅtirmektir. EÄer programÄ±n lisansÄ±, 
var
-olan bir bÃ¶lÃ¼mÃ¼n iÃ§erisine ekleme yapamayacaÄÄ±nÄ±zÄ± diyorsa, Ã¶rneÄin
-eklediÄiniz her kodun telif hakkÄ± sahibi olmanÄ±z gerektiÄini sÃ¶ylÃ¼yorsa, 
o
-lisans, Ã¶zgÃ¼r olarak tanÄ±mlamak iÃ§in Ã§ok kÄ±sÄ±tlayÄ±cÄ±dÄ±r.
+One important way to modify a program is by merging in available free
+subroutines and modules.  If the program's license says that you cannot
+merge in a suitably licensed existing module &mdash; for instance, if it
+requires you to be the copyright holder of any code you add &mdash; then the
+license is too restrictive to qualify as free.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Freedom 3 includes the freedom to use release your modified versions as free
+software.  A free license may also permit other ways of releasing them; in
+other words, it does not have to be a <a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> license.  However, a license
+that requires modified versions to be nonfree does not qualify as a free
+license.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -131,15 +139,14 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-<q>ÃzgÃ¼r yazÄ±lÄ±m</q>, <q>ticari olmayan</q> demek deÄildir. ÃzgÃ¼r bir
-program, ticari kullanÄ±m, ticari geliÅtirme ve ticari daÄÄ±tÄ±m iÃ§in
-kullanÄ±labilir. ÃzgÃ¼r yazÄ±lÄ±mlarÄ±n ticari geliÅtirilmeleri artÄ±k 
alÄ±ÅÄ±lmadÄ±k
-bir durum deÄil; artÄ±k Ã¶zgÃ¼r ticari yazÄ±lÄ±mlar Ã§ok Ã¶nemlidir. ÃzgÃ¼r
-yazÄ±lÄ±mÄ±n kopylarÄ±na sahip olmak iÃ§in Ã¼cret Ã¶demeniz gerekebilir veya
-kopyalarÄ± hiÃ§bir Ã¼cret karÅÄ±lÄ±ÄÄ± olmadan da edinmiÅ olabilirsiniz. 
Kopyalara
-nasÄ±l sahip olduÄunuzdan baÄÄ±msÄ±z olarak, herzaman iÃ§in yazÄ±lÄ±mÄ±n 
kopyalama,
-deÄiÅtirme ve hatta <a href="/philosophy/selling.html">kopyalarÄ±nÄ± 
satma</a>
-haklarÄ±na sahipsinizdir.
+<q>Free software</q> does not mean <q>noncommercial.</q> A free program must
+be available for commercial use, commercial development, and commercial
+distribution.  Commercial development of free software is no longer unusual;
+such free commercial software is very important.  You may have paid money to
+get copies of free software, or you may have obtained copies at no charge.
+But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to
+copy and change the software, even to <a
+href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -150,22 +157,28 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Yeniden dÃ¼zenlenmiÅ bir sÃ¼rÃ¼mÃ¼ paketlemeye dair kurallar, yeniden
-dÃ¼zenlenmiÅ sÃ¼rÃ¼mleri, yayÄ±nlama Ã¶zgÃ¼rlÃ¼ÄÃ¼nÃ¼zÃ¼ engellemediÄi 
sÃ¼rece ya da
-yeniden dÃ¼zenlenmiÅ sÃ¼rÃ¼mler yapmanÄ±za ve Ã¶zel olarak kullanmanÄ±za izin
-verdiÄi sÃ¼rece kabul eidilebilirler. AynÄ± Åekilde, <q>eÄer bu yolla 
sÃ¼rÃ¼mÃ¼
-kullanÄ±labilir yaparsanÄ±z, Åu halde de ulaÅÄ±labilir yapmanÄ±z gerekir</q>
-kurallarÄ± da kabul edilebilir. (Bunun gibi bir kural hala size kendi
-sÃ¼rÃ¼mÃ¼nÃ¼zÃ¼ yayÄ±nlayÄ±p yayÄ±nlamama seÃ§eneÄi bÄ±rakÄ±yor.) Kendi 
sÃ¼rÃ¼mlerinizi
-kamuya aÃ§arken, sÃ¼rÃ¼mlerin kaynak kodunun yayÄ±nlanmasÄ±na dair kurallar da
-kabul edilebilirler. LisansÄ±n, eÄer deÄiÅtirilmiÅ bir sÃ¼rÃ¼mÃ¼ 
daÄÄ±ttÄ±ysanÄ±z
-ve bir Ã¶nceki geliÅtirici bir kopya istediÄinde, bir tane gÃ¶ndermek zorunda
-olmanÄ±z veya yaptÄ±ÄÄ±nÄ±z deÄiÅikliklerde kendinizi tanÄ±tmanÄ±zÄ± 
gerektirmesi
-de kabul edilebilirdir.
+However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable, if
+they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified versions, or
+your freedom to make and use modified versions privately.  Rules that <q>if
+you make your version available in this way, you must make it available in
+that way also</q> can be acceptable too, on the same condition.  (Note that
+such a rule still leaves you the choice of whether to publish your version
+at all.)  Rules that require release of source code to the users for
+versions that you put into public use are also acceptable.  It is also
+acceptable for the license to require that you identify your modifications
+as yours, or that, if you have distributed a modified version and a previous
+developer asks for a copy of it, you must send one.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-http://www.google.com/profiles/pittle.org
+In the GNU project, we use <q><a
+href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a></q> to protect these freedoms
+legally for everyone.  But <a
+href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">non-copylefted
+free software</a> also exists.  We believe there are important reasons why
+<a href="/philosophy/pragmatic.html">it is better to use copyleft</a>, but
+if your program is non-copylefted free software, it is still basically
+ethical.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -188,35 +201,32 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-BirÃ§ok Ã¶zgÃ¼r yazÄ±lÄ±m lisansÄ± telif hakkÄ±na dayanÄ±r ve ne gibi
-gereksinimlerin telif hakkÄ±na dayatÄ±lacaÄÄ±na dair sÄ±nÄ±rlamalar vardÄ±r. 
EÄer
-bir telif hakkÄ± tabanlÄ± lisans, yukarÄ±da aÃ§Ä±kladÄ±ÄÄ±mÄ±z 
Ã¶zgÃ¼rlÃ¼klere saygÄ±
-gÃ¶steriyorsa, daha Ã¶nce beklemediÄimiz herhangi tÃ¼rden bir sorunla
-karÅÄ±laÅma olasÄ±lÄ±ÄÄ±mÄ±z zayÄ±f olacaktÄ±r (aslÄ±nda bu ara sÄ±ra 
olur). Buna
-raÄmen, bazÄ± Ã¶zgÃ¼r yazÄ±lÄ±m lisanslarÄ± sÃ¶zleÅmelere dayanmaktadÄ±r ve 
bazÄ±
-sÃ¶zleÅmeler, olaÄan kÄ±sÄ±tlamalara geniÅ bir Åekilde 
dayatÄ±labilmektedir. Bu
-da, bir lisansÄ±n kabul edilemez kÄ±sÄ±tlamalara ve Ã¶zgÃ¼r olarak kabul
-edilmemesine dair mÃ¼mkÃ¼n birÃ§ok yol olduÄunu belirtir.
+Most free software licenses are based on copyright, and there are limits on
+what kinds of requirements can be imposed through copyright.  If a
+copyright-based license respects freedom in the ways described above, it is
+unlikely to have some other sort of problem that we never anticipated
+(though this does happen occasionally).  However, some free software
+licenses are based on contracts, and contracts can impose a much larger
+range of possible restrictions.  That means there are many possible ways
+such a license could be unacceptably restrictive and nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-BÃ¼yÃ¼k olasÄ±lÄ±kla, olabilecek tÃ¼m yollarÄ± burada listeleyemeyebiliriz. 
EÄer
-bir sÃ¶zleÅme tabanlÄ± lisans, kullanÄ±cÄ±yÄ± telif hakkÄ± tabanlÄ± bir 
lisansÄ±n
-yapamayacaÄÄ±, alÄ±ÅÄ±lmadÄ±k bir Åekilde kÄ±sÄ±tlarsa ve burada meÅru 
olarak
-aÃ§Ä±klanmamÄ±Åsa, o halde bu konu hakkÄ±nda dÃ¼ÅÃ¼nmemiz gerekir ve bunu
-herhalde, Ã¶zgÃ¼r olmayan bir lisans olarak tanÄ±mlayacaÄÄ±zdÄ±r.
+We can't possibly list all the ways that might happen.  If a contract-based
+license restricts the user in an unusual way that copyright-based licenses
+cannot, and which isn't mentioned here as legitimate, we will have to think
+about it, and we will probably conclude it is nonfree.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-ÃzgÃ¼r yazÄ±lÄ±m hakkÄ±nda konuÅurken <q>bedava</q> gibi terimler 
kullanmaktan
-kaÃ§Ä±nmak en iyisidir. ÃÃ¼nkÃ¼ insanlar, konunun Ã¶zgÃ¼rlÃ¼kle ilgili deÄil,
-parayla ilgili olduÄunu sanabilirler. <q>KorsanlÄ±k</q> gibi bazÄ± genel
-terimleri temsil eden dÃ¼ÅÃ¼nceleri desteklemeyeceÄinizi umuyoruz. Bu 
terimler
-ile ilgili bir tartÄ±Åma iÃ§in <a
-href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Kullanmaktan KaÃ§Ä±nÄ±lmasÄ± Gereken
-Kelimeler ve Deyimler</a> sayfasÄ±na bakabilirsiniz. <a
-href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html"><q>Ã¶zgÃ¼r yazÄ±lÄ±m</q></a> 
kavramÄ±nÄ±n
-birÃ§ok dile Ã§evirisini iÃ§eren bir listemiz var.
+When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms like
+<q>give away</q> or <q>for free,</q> because those terms imply that the
+issue is about price, not freedom.  Some common terms such as <q>piracy</q>
+embody opinions we hope you won't endorse.  See <a
+href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html">Confusing Words and Phrases that are
+Worth Avoiding</a> for a discussion of these terms.  We also have a list of
+proper <a href="/philosophy/fs-translations.html">translations of <q>free
+software</q></a> into various languages.
 </p>
 
 <p>
@@ -243,17 +253,17 @@
 </p> 
 
 <p>
-EÄer yeni bir lisans yazmayÄ± dÃ¼ÅÃ¼nÃ¼yorsanÄ±z, bu adrese yazarak FSF ile
-irtibat kurunuz. DeÄiÅik Ã¶zgÃ¼r yazÄ±lÄ±m lisanslarÄ±nÄ±n Ã§oÄalmasÄ±,
-kullanÄ±cÄ±larÄ±n lisanslarÄ± anlayabilmek iÃ§in daha fazla Ã§aba sarf edeceÄi
-anlamÄ±na gelir; belki sizin iÃ§in, gereksinimlerinizi karÅÄ±layabilecek 
mevcut
-bir ÃzgÃ¼r YazÄ±lÄ±m lisansÄ± bulmanÄ±zda yardÄ±mcÄ± olabiliriz.
+If you are contemplating writing a new license, please contact the Free
+Software Foundation first by writing to that address. The proliferation of
+different free software licenses means increased work for users in
+understanding the licenses; we may be able to help you find an existing free
+software license that meets your needs.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-EÄer bu olanaksÄ±zsa ve gerÃ§ekten yeni bir lisansa gereksiniminiz varsa,
-bizim yardÄ±mÄ±mÄ±zla, lisansÄ±nÄ±zÄ±n bir ÃzgÃ¼r YazÄ±lÄ±m lisansÄ± 
olduÄunu temin
-edebilir ve olasÄ± uygulama sorunlarÄ±ndan kurtulabilirsiniz.
+If that isn't possible, if you really need a new license, with our help you
+can ensure that the license really is a free software license and avoid
+various practical problems.
 </p>
 
 <h2 id="beyond-software">YazÄ±lÄ±mÄ±n YanÄ±nda</h2>
@@ -298,6 +308,17 @@
 <ul>
 
 <li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.89&amp;r2=1.90";>Version
+1.90</a>: Clarify that freedom 3 means the right to distribute copies of
+your own modified or improved version, not a right to participate in someone
+else's development project.</li>
+
+<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.88&amp;r2=1.89";>Version
+1.89</a>: Freedom 3 includes the right to release modified versions as free
+software.</li>
+
+<li><a
 
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&amp;r1=1.79&amp;r2=1.80";>SÃ¼rÃ¼m
 1.80</a>: 1 numaralÄ± Ã¶zgÃ¼rlÃ¼k uygulanabilir olmalÄ±dÄ±r, yalnÄ±zca teorik
 deÄil; Ã¶rn., tivolaÅtÄ±rma olmamalÄ±.</li>
@@ -475,7 +496,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 Son GÃ¼ncelleme:
 
-$Date: 2009/11/26 09:26:10 $
+$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:52 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: x.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/x.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -b -r1.10 -r1.11
--- x.fr.html   2 Aug 2009 20:29:44 -0000       1.10
+++ x.fr.html   29 Jan 2010 09:25:52 -0000      1.11
@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Copyleft ou pas&nbsp;? C'est l'une des controverses majeures dans la
-communaut&eacute; du logiciel libre. L'id&eacute;e du copyleft est que nous
-devrions combattre le feu par le feu &mdash;&nbsp;que nous devrions utiliser
-le copyright pour &ecirc;tre s&ucirc;r que notre code reste libre. La GPL
-GNU est un exemple de licence copyleft.</p>
+To copyleft or not to copyleft? That is one of the major controversies in
+the free software community.  The idea of copyleft is that we should fight
+fire with fire&mdash;that we should use copyright to make sure our code
+stays free.  The GNU General Public License (GNU GPL) is one example of a
+copyleft license.</p>
 
 <p>
 Certains d&eacute;veloppeurs de logiciel libre pr&eacute;f&egrave;rent une
@@ -48,13 +48,11 @@
 logiciel sous copyleft ne peut pas figurer dans une distribution X.</p>
 
 <p>
-Pourquoi le Consortium X a t-il adopt&eacute; cette politique&nbsp;? Cela
-avait trait &agrave; leur d&eacute;finition du succ&egrave;s. Le Consortium
-X a d&eacute;fini le succ&egrave;s comme &eacute;tant la popularit&eacute;
-&mdash;&nbsp;sp&eacute;cifiquement en obtenant des soci&eacute;t&eacute;s
-informatiques d'utiliser le syst&egrave;me X Window. Cette d&eacute;finition
-a mis les soci&eacute;t&eacute;s informatiques aux commandes. Tout ce
-qu'elles voulaient, le Consortium X devait les aider &agrave; l'obtenir.</p>
+Why did the X Consortium adopt this policy? It had to do with their
+conception of success.  The X Consortium defined success as
+popularity&mdash;specifically, getting computer companies to use the X
+Window System.  This definition put the computer companies in the driver's
+seat: whatever they wanted, the X Consortium had to help them get it.</p>
 
 <p>
 Les soci&eacute;t&eacute;s informatiques distribuent normalement des
@@ -71,20 +69,16 @@
 n'&eacute;tait m&ecirc;me pas un sacrifice.</p>
 
 <p>
-Mais le sacrifice de soi n'est pas le probl&egrave;me&nbsp;: rejeter la
-d&eacute;fense que fournit le copyleft, qui prot&egrave;ge l'ensemble de la
-communaut&eacute;, est un sacrifice qui d&eacute;passe sa propre
-personne. Ceux qui ont acc&eacute;d&eacute; &agrave; la requ&ecirc;te du
-Consortium X ont confi&eacute; le futur de la communaut&eacute; au bon
-vouloir du Consortium X.</p>
+But self-sacrifice is not the issue: tossing away the defense that copyleft
+provides, which protects the freedom of the whole community, is sacrificing
+more than yourself.  Those who granted the X Consortium's request entrusted
+the community's future to the goodwill of the X Consortium.</p>
 
 <p>
-Cette confiance &eacute;tait mal plac&eacute;e. Dans sa derni&egrave;re
-ann&eacute;e, le Consortium X a fait le projet de restreindre la version
-X11R6.4 &agrave; para&icirc;tre, de sorte qu'elle ne sera pas un logiciel
-libre. Ils ont d&eacute;cid&eacute; de commencer &agrave; dire non, pas
-seulement aux d&eacute;veloppeurs de logiciel propri&eacute;taire, mais
-&eacute;galement &agrave; notre communaut&eacute;.</p>
+This trust was misplaced.  In its last year, the X Consortium made a plan to
+restrict the forthcoming X11R6.4 release so that it would not be free
+software.  They decided to start saying no, not only to proprietary software
+developers, but to our community as well.</p>
 
 <p>
 C'est plut&ocirc;t ironique. Si vous aviez dit oui quand le Consortium X
@@ -93,41 +87,32 @@
 programme, en plus du code du noyau de X.</p>
 
 <p>
-Le Consortium X n'a pas mis &agrave; ex&eacute;cution son projet. Au lieu de
-cela, il s'est arr&ecirc;t&eacute; et a transf&eacute;r&eacute; le
-d&eacute;veloppement de X &agrave; l'Open Group, dont le personnel
-ex&eacute;cute &agrave; pr&eacute;sent un projet similaire. Pour leur rendre
-justice, quand je leur ai demand&eacute; de r&eacute;aliser X11R6.4 sous les
-termes de la GPL GNU parall&egrave;lement &agrave; leur projet de licence
-restrictive, ils ont souhait&eacute; r&eacute;fl&eacute;chir &agrave; la
-question. (Ils &eacute;taient fermement oppos&eacute;s &agrave;
-l'id&eacute;e de conserver les termes de distribution de l'ancien
-X11). Avant qu'ils ne r&eacute;pondent &agrave; cette proposition, elle
-avait d&eacute;j&agrave; &eacute;chou&eacute; pour une autre raison&nbsp;:
-le groupe <a href="http://www.xfree86.org/";>XFree86</a> avait suivi
-l'ancienne politique du Consortium X, et n'accepterait pas de logiciel sous
-copyleft.
+The X Consortium did not carry out this plan.  Instead it closed down and
+transferred X development to the Open Group, whose staff are now carrying
+out a similar plan.  To give them credit, when I asked them to release
+X11R6.4 under the GNU GPL in parallel with their planned restrictive
+license, they were willing to consider the idea.  (They were firmly against
+staying with the old X11 distribution terms.)  Before they said yes or no to
+this proposal, it had already failed for another reason: the XFree86 group
+followed the X Consortium's old policy, and will not accept copylefted
+software.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-[En septembre 1998, plusieurs mois apr&egrave;s la sortie de X11R6.4
-assortie des termes de distribution non-libre, l'Open Group changea d'avis
-et ressortit cette version sous les m&ecirc;mes termes de licence de
-logiciel libre sans copyleft que ceux utilis&eacute;s pour la version
-X11R6.3. Merci l'Open Group.]
-</p>
-
-<p>
-M&ecirc;me si le Consortium X et l'Open Group n'avaient jamais pr&eacute;vu
-de restreindre X, quelqu'un d'autre aurait pu le faire. Les logiciels sans
-copyleft sont vuln&eacute;rables &agrave; tous points de vue; il permet
-&agrave; quiconque de r&eacute;aliser une version non-libre dominante, s'il
-investit suffisamment de moyens pour ajouter des fonctionnalit&eacute;s
-significatives importantes utilisant du code propri&eacute;taire. Les
-utilisateurs qui choisissent un logiciel bas&eacute; sur des
-caract&eacute;ristiques techniques, plut&ocirc;t que sur la libert&eacute;,
-pourraient facilement &ecirc;tre attir&eacute;s par la version non-libre
-pour des questions de commodit&eacute;s &agrave; court terme.</p>
+In September 1998, several months after X11R6.4 was released with nonfree
+distribution terms, the Open Group reversed its decision and rereleased it
+under the same non-copyleft free software license that was used for
+X11R6.3.  Thus, the Open Group therefore eventually did what was right, but
+that does not alter the general issue.</p>
+
+<p>
+Even if the X Consortium and the Open Group had never planned to restrict X,
+someone else could have done it.  Non-copylefted software is vulnerable from
+all directions; it lets anyone make a nonfree version dominant, if he will
+invest sufficient resources to add significantly important features using
+proprietary code.  Users who choose software based on technical
+characteristics, rather than on freedom, could easily be lured to the
+nonfree version for short-term convenience.</p>
 
 <p>
 Le Consortium X et l'Open Group ne peuvent plus &agrave; pr&eacute;sent
@@ -136,18 +121,15 @@
 relatif &agrave; X.</p>
 
 <p>
-Quand vous travaillez sur le noyau de X, sur des programmes tels que X
-server, Xlib, et Xt, il y a une raison pratique de ne pas utiliser le
-copyleft. Le groupe XFree86 fait un travail important pour la
-communaut&eacute; en maintenant ces programmes, et le b&eacute;n&eacute;fice
-de mettre nos changements sous copyleft seraient moindres que le tort fait
-par une branche dans le d&eacute;veloppement. Aussi, il est
-pr&eacute;f&eacute;rable de travailler avec le groupe XFree86 et de ne pas
-mettre sous copyleft nos changements sur ces programmes. Tout comme pour les
-utilitaires tels que xset et xrdb, qui sont proches du noyau de X et qui
-n'ont pas besoin d'am&eacute;liorations majeures. Nous savons au moins que
-le groupe XFree86 a la ferme intention de d&eacute;velopper ces programmes
-en tant que logiciels libres.</p>
+When you work on the core of X, on programs such as the X server, Xlib, and
+Xt, there is a practical reason not to use copyleft.  The X.org group does
+an important job for the community in maintaining these programs, and the
+benefit of copylefting our changes would be less than the harm done by a
+fork in development.  So it is better to work with them, and not copyleft
+our changes on these programs.  Likewise for utilities such as xset and
+xrdb, which are close to the core of X and do not need major improvements.
+At least we know that the X.org group has a firm commitment to developing
+these programs as free software.</p>
 
 <p>
 Le probl&egrave;me est diff&eacute;rent pour les programmes
@@ -157,12 +139,11 @@
 devrions le faire.</p>
 
 <p>
-Au cas ou quelqu'un ressentirait la pression exerc&eacute;e par le
-crit&egrave;re d'inclusion dans les distributions X, le projet GNU
-entreprendra de de rendre publics les paquetages sous copyleft qui
-fonctionnent avec X. Si vous voulez mettre sous copyleft quelque chose, et
-que vous craignez que son omission dans la distribution de X g&ecirc;ne sa
-popularit&eacute;, veuillez nous contacter pour vous aider.</p>
+In case anyone feels the pressure exerted by the criteria for inclusion in
+the X distributions, the GNU Project will undertake to publicize copylefted
+packages that work with X.  If you would like to copyleft something, and you
+worry that its omission from the X distribution will impede its popularity,
+please ask us to help.</p>
 
 <p>
 En m&ecirc;me temps, il est pr&eacute;f&eacute;rable de ne pas ressentir un
@@ -180,12 +161,10 @@
 programme avec copyleft, une fois que vous l'aurez mis au d&eacute;fi.</p>
 
 <p>
-Compagnons, d&eacute;veloppeurs de logiciel libre, ne refaites pas cette
-erreur. Si nous ne mettons pas nos logiciels sous copyleft, nous mettons
-leur futur &agrave; la merci de quiconque dispose de plus de moyens que de
-scrupules. Avec le copyleft, nous pouvons d&eacute;fendre notre
-libert&eacute;, pas seulement la n&ocirc;tre, mais celle de l'ensemble de la
-communaut&eacute;.</p>
+Friends, free software developers, don't repeat old mistakes! If we do not
+copyleft our software, we put its future at the mercy of anyone equipped
+with more resources than scruples.  With copyleft, we can defend freedom,
+not just for ourselves, but for our whole community.</p>
 
 
 <div style="font-size: small;">
@@ -218,9 +197,9 @@
 </p>
 
 <p>
-Copyright &copy; 1999 Richard M. Stallman <br />La reproduction exacte et la
-distribution intÃ©grale de cet article est permise sur n'importe quel support
-d'archivage, pourvu que cette notice soit prÃ©servÃ©e.
+Copyright &copy; 1998, 1999, 2009 Richard M. Stallman <br /> Verbatim
+copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium
+without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
 </p>
 
 
@@ -233,7 +212,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 DerniÃ¨re mise Ã  jour&nbsp;:
 
-$Date: 2009/08/02 20:29:44 $
+$Date: 2010/01/29 09:25:52 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread]
www/philosophy free-sw.af.html free-sw.ar.html ..., Yavor Doganov <=
Prev by Date: www/people/po people.pot
Next by Date: www/thankgnus 2010supporters.html
Previous by thread: www/people/po people.pot
Next by thread: www/philosophy linux-gnu-freedom.html
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread