[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy danger-of-software-patents.html
From: |
Brett Smith |
Subject: |
www/philosophy danger-of-software-patents.html |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:28:37 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Brett Smith <brett> 09/11/10 15:28:37
Modified files:
philosophy : danger-of-software-patents.html
Log message:
validation fixes
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
Patches:
Index: danger-of-software-patents.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- danger-of-software-patents.html 5 Nov 2009 23:25:18 -0000 1.2
+++ danger-of-software-patents.html 10 Nov 2009 15:28:31 -0000 1.3
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
<p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</a></p>
<p>This is the transcript of a talk presented by Richard M. Stallman
-on 8 October 2009 at Victoria University of Wellington.</b> </p>
+on 8 October 2009 at Victoria University of Wellington.</p>
<dl>
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
<dt>RMS:</dt>
-<dd>First of all, I'd like to mention one of the reasons why I'm
+<dd><p>First of all, I'd like to mention one of the reasons why I'm
drinking this is there's a worldwide boycott of Coca-Cola Company for
murdering union organisers in Colombia. Look at the site <a
href="http://killercoke.org">killercoke.org</a>, and they're not
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@
so they're economically self-defeating, and there's even economic
research showing that this is so, showing how in a field with a lot of
incremental innovation, a patent system can actually reduce investment
-in R & D. And of course, it also obstructs development in other
+in R & D. And of course, it also obstructs development in other
ways. So even if we ignore the injustice of software patents, even if
we were to look at it in the narrow economic terms that are usually
proposed, it's still harmful. People sometimes respond by saying that
@@ -915,7 +915,7 @@
<dd>How do you prevent plagiarism and still </dd>
-<dt>A.</dd>
+<dt>A.</dt>
<dd>Plagiarism has nothing to do with this issue. It has absolutely
nothing to do with this issue. Plagiarism means copying the text of a
@@ -1262,8 +1262,6 @@
<dd>So you're welcome to come down. It's been a great debate - thank
you Richard.</dd>
-</dd>
-
</dl>
</div>
@@ -1299,7 +1297,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2009/11/05 23:25:18 $
+$Date: 2009/11/10 15:28:31 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>