www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/fun/jokes linus-islam.html


From: Joakim Olsson
Subject: www/fun/jokes linus-islam.html
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:39:25 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Joakim Olsson <jocke>   07/08/11 23:39:25

Modified files:
        fun/jokes      : linus-islam.html 

Log message:
        Fixed invalid HTML.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/fun/jokes/linus-islam.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2

Patches:
Index: linus-islam.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/fun/jokes/linus-islam.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- linus-islam.html    11 Aug 2007 22:31:11 -0000      1.1
+++ linus-islam.html    11 Aug 2007 23:39:10 -0000      1.2
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 <HTML>
 <HEAD>
 <TITLE>Linus converts to Islam - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation 
(FSF)</TITLE>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
 <LINK REV="made" HREF="mailto:address@hidden";>
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000" LINK="#1F00FF" ALINK="#FF0000" 
VLINK="#9900DD">
@@ -12,15 +13,14 @@
    ALT=" [colorful rounded image of the Head of a GNU]"
    WIDTH="153" HEIGHT="128"></A>
 
-<P>
 <HR>
-</P>
+
 <b>Wiki News</b>
 
 <p>Linus Torvalds, joining such other pioneers as Cat
 Stevens, and Sammy Davis Jr., has converted to Islam. 
 As a result, he has now renounced his prior work in
-furthering the &ldquo;open source movement&rdquo; and revoked the
+furthering the “open source movement” and revoked the
 licence for use of his Linux kernel.  
 
 <p>When reached for comment, the notorious recluse stated
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
 it sharpens the distinctions between the open source
 compared with the free software movement.  Speaking
 off the record, the source expanded on the
-&ldquo;knife-edge&rdquo; or &ldquo;house of cards&rdquo; on which the open
+“knife-edge” or “house of cards” on which the open
 source movement is built, dependent on a small span of
 traditional rights, whereas the free software movement
 encourages more broad, cultural change, which, he
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
 not already occurring now, and raise the issue of
 China and its parallel standards to accepted
 protocols.  Others point to the eventual expiration of
-the protected rights which are key to all &ldquo;open
-source&rdquo; software, so that Linus Torvald&rdquo;s conversion
+the protected rights which are key to all “open
+source” software, so that Linus Torvald”s conversion
 should serve as a wake-up call as to the broader
 problem -- a kind of Linux Y2K -- even if a new kernel
 is reverse-engineered to replace the Torvalds kernel.
@@ -71,15 +71,15 @@
 <p>Critical of the Eric Raymond model, which he says
 examined an empirical case, the early growth of
 Linux, and distilled what he took to be the active
-ingredient &mdash;massive independent peer review&mdash; he
+ingredient —massive independent peer review— he
 points out that while such review may help debug
-software, that it doesn&rsquo;t inspire software (nor new
+software, that it doesn't inspire software (nor new
 ideas in general) unlike a culture of freedom such as
 free software promotes.  Additionally, open source
 only promotes peer review of those who can afford
 access, whereas the free software movement encourages
-a much wider peer review, and &ldquo;that&rsquo;s just better for
-software too,&rdquo; this insider claims.
+a much wider peer review, and “that's just better for
+software too,” this insider claims.
 
 <p>Moreover, whereas the Raymond model is an outgrowth of
 an empirical case, stalling actions in the inexorable
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
 built by those with a certain playfulness, both in
 computer terms, and linguistically.  One new proponent
 suggests that the time is right for a new challenge,
-which he terms, &ldquo;often aims.&rdquo;  This manifesto he
+which he terms, “often aims.”  This manifesto he
 derives as follows: habitual and often are synonymous,
 as are goals and aims.  Whereas a manifesto is a
 statement of habitual goals, this translates as that a
@@ -128,9 +128,7 @@
 <H4>Disclaimer</H4>
 <P>The Free Software Foundation claims no copyrights on this text.
 
-<P>
 <HR>
-</P>
 
 <P>
 Return to <A HREF="/home.html">GNU's home page</A>.
@@ -150,7 +148,7 @@
 <P>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2007/08/11 22:31:11 $
+$Date: 2007/08/11 23:39:10 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 <HR>
 </BODY>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]