www/philosophy microsoft-new-monopoly.html

[Joakim Olsson]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Joakim Olsson <jocke>   07/08/08 09:56:40

Modified files:
        philosophy     : microsoft-new-monopoly.html 

Log message:
        Fixed invalid HTML.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16

Patches:
Index: microsoft-new-monopoly.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/microsoft-new-monopoly.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- microsoft-new-monopoly.html 4 Aug 2007 23:39:40 -0000       1.15
+++ microsoft-new-monopoly.html 8 Aug 2007 09:56:27 -0000       1.16
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@
 
 <p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";><strong>Richard 
Stallman</strong></a></p>
 
-<blockquote> Note: Microsoft adopted a different policy in 2006, so the
+<i>Note: Microsoft adopted a different policy in 2006, so the
 details discussed on this page are now only of historical significance.
 That doesn't mean the patent problem for OOXML is gone.
 <a 
href="http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections#Patent_rights_to_implement_the_Ecma_376_specification_have_not_been_granted";>
 Microsoft's cunningly-worded new policy does give anyone clear
 permission to implement OOXML.</a>
-</blockquote>
+</i>
 
 <p>European legislators who endorse software patents frequently claim
 that those wouldn't affect free software (or &ldquo;open
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2007/08/04 23:39:40 $
+$Date: 2007/08/08 09:56:27 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>