www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/gnu thegnuproject.html


From: Exal de Jesus Garcia Carrillo
Subject: www/gnu thegnuproject.html
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:09:35 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Exal de Jesus Garcia Carrillo <exal>    06/12/16 00:09:35

Modified files:
        gnu            : thegnuproject.html 

Log message:
        I have fixed some typos.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/gnu/thegnuproject.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25

Patches:
Index: thegnuproject.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/gnu/thegnuproject.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- thegnuproject.html  20 Oct 2006 18:49:36 -0000      1.24
+++ thegnuproject.html  16 Dec 2006 00:09:31 -0000      1.25
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@
 not care whether these users had freedom, only that they should be
 numerous.</p>
 <p>
-This lead to a paradoxical situation where two different ways of
+This led to a paradoxical situation where two different ways of
 counting the amount of freedom gave different answers to the question,
 "Is this program free?"  If you judged based on the freedom provided
 by the distribution terms of the MIT release, you would say that X was
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@
 components were found or developed, eventually it became useful to
 make a list of the remaining gaps.  We used it to recruit developers
 to write the missing pieces.  This list became known as the GNU task
-list.  In addition to missing Unix components, we listed added various
+list.  In addition to missing Unix components, we listed various
 other useful software and documentation projects that, we thought, a
 truly complete system ought to have.</p>
 <p>
@@ -815,7 +815,7 @@
 Those of us who value free software for freedom's sake will stay with
 free software anyway.  We will manage to get work done without the
 patented features.  But those who value free software because they
-expect it to be techically superior are likely to call it a failure
+expect it to be technically superior are likely to call it a failure
 when a patent holds it back.  Thus, while it is useful to talk about
 the practical effectiveness of the "cathedral" model of development (1),
 and the reliability and power of some free software, we must not
@@ -1034,7 +1034,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2006/10/20 18:49:36 $ $Author: jimcrow $
+$Date: 2006/12/16 00:09:31 $ $Author: exal $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]