www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy philosophy.html


From: Karl Berry
Subject: www/philosophy philosophy.html
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:59:29 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Karl Berry <karl>       06/10/28 13:59:29

Modified files:
        philosophy     : philosophy.html 

Log message:
        link to http://lwn.net/Articles/204641/ per rms, ticket 317042.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/philosophy.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.204&r2=1.205

Patches:
Index: philosophy.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/philosophy.html,v
retrieving revision 1.204
retrieving revision 1.205
diff -u -b -r1.204 -r1.205
--- philosophy.html     26 Oct 2006 20:09:14 -0000      1.204
+++ philosophy.html     28 Oct 2006 13:59:27 -0000      1.205
@@ -518,8 +518,11 @@
   Free Knowledge requires Free Software and Free File Formats</a> in this 
paper. He also exposes why 
   <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org";>Wikipedia</a> needs to be free 
software.</li>
   <li><a href="http://www.juergen-ernst.de/info_swpat_en.html";>Software 
patents under the
-  magnifying glass</a>. In this article the author uses arguments based on 
lambda calculus
-  to show why software cannot be patented.</li>
+      magnifying glass</a>. In this article the author uses arguments
+      based on lambda calculus to show why software cannot be patented.</li>
+  <li><a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/204641/";>Free gadgets need free
+      software</a>, an editorial reporting a firmware "upgrade" that
+      removes the ability to record radio broadcasts.</li>
   <li>Lakhani and Wolf's <a 
href="http://freesoftware.mit.edu/papers/lakhaniwolf.pdf";>paper on the 
motivation of free software developers</a> says that a considerable fraction 
are motivated by the view that software should be free.  This was despite the 
fact that they surveyed the developers on SourceForge, a site that does not 
support the view that this is an ethical issue.</li>
   <li><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11663";>Groklaw
   sends a Dear Darl letter</a>; a group from the free software and
@@ -878,7 +881,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2006/10/26 20:09:14 $ $Author: johnsu01 $
+$Date: 2006/10/28 13:59:27 $ $Author: karl $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]