www/philosophy bsd.html

[D. E. Evans]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     D. E. Evans <sinuhe>    06/10/25 15:22:20

Modified files:
        philosophy     : bsd.html 

Log message:
        Add links to the license list for clarity.  This is in response to
        RT ticket 232017.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/bsd.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.14&r2=1.15

Patches:
Index: bsd.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/bsd.html,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -b -r1.14 -r1.15
--- bsd.html    4 May 2006 16:30:20 -0000       1.14
+++ bsd.html    25 Oct 2006 15:22:18 -0000      1.15
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 The two major categories of free software license are
 <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> and
 <a href="/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware">
-non-copyleft </a>.  Copyleft licenses such as the <a 
href="/copyleft/gpl.html">GNU GPL</a>
+non-copyleft </a>.  <a 
href="/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses">Copyleft licenses</a> 
such as the <a href="/copyleft/gpl.html">GNU GPL</a>
 insist that modified versions
 of the program must be free software as well.  Non-copyleft licenses
 do not insist on this.  <a href="/philosophy/why-copyleft.html">We
@@ -38,14 +38,14 @@
 freedom for all users, but non-copylefted software can still be free
 software, and useful to the free software community.</p>
 <p>
-There are many variants of simple non-copyleft free software licenses,
+There are many variants of simple <a 
href="/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses">non-copyleft free 
software licenses</a>,
 including the X10 license, the
 <a href="http://www.x.org/Downloads_terms.html";>
 X11 license</a>, the FreeBSD
 license, and the two BSD (Berkeley Software Distribution) licenses.
 Most of them are equivalent except for details of wording, but the
-license used for BSD until 1999 had a special problem: the ``obnoxious
-BSD advertising clause''.  It said that every advertisement mentioning
+license used for BSD until 1999 had a special problem: the <q>obnoxious
+BSD advertising clause.</q>  It said that every advertisement mentioning
 the software must include a particular sentence:</p>
 <pre>
 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2006/05/04 16:30:20 $ $Author: puigpe $
+$Date: 2006/10/25 15:22:18 $ $Author: sinuhe $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>