Re: [gprolog] Re: variable fonction

[Gilles Dégottex]

On Monday 24 March 2003 14:53, Ludovic Langevine wrote:
> > and you know a non-standard linux interpreter which support variable
> > functor ?
>
> no, I don't, sorry! have you got any problem you cannot solve with =.. ?

no no, I just think variable functors are more intuitive and in the way the 
prolog engine works (with unification and not affectation).

> Lambda Prolog interpreters provide variable functors I think, but it is
> still hard to find a good and up-to-date implementation. And this is not
> pure Prolog...

ok, now, I use win-prolog under wine :)

Gilles