|
From: | Anthony Bisset |
Subject: | Re: [Traverso-devel] Proposal: changing Sheet concept in Traverso |
Date: | Wed, 9 Jun 2010 02:09:46 +0900 |
Yes, my workflow is similar to yours -- {"we often need quite different mix setups for various songs on a CD. "}"Sheets" make a much more efficient workflow when assembling a series of tracks.
A On Jun 9, 2010, at 1:58 AM, plutek wrote:
Excerpts from Anthony Bisset's message of Tue Jun 08 12:46:11 -0400 2010:Hi Remon & Plutek, I've been doing a lot of mastering recently (past ~6 months). The commercial software I use does not have the Traverso sheet functionality and I wish it did.is your *reason* for wanting the "sheet" functionality similar to mine?A On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:13 AM, plutek wrote:we often need quite different mix setups for various songs on a CD. i don't think there's ANY really logical way of keeping all that on one timeline -- we might have different plugins, different tracks, etc., etc., so separate "sessions" of some sort makes sense. in traverso with Sheets, at least we could keep various radically different mix setups together within one project, and switch effortlessly between them. then we can write out the mixed tracks, and set those up in another sheet to play with the sequencing, fine- tune the heads and tails, and do the mastering, which makes sense, conceptually, because we are looking at unifying the project at that point.-- .pltk.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |