My fault Ed...
1. I did miss the possibility of ADIF generation from TLF
2. I have tested different Cabrillo to ADIF converters, and this resulted in writing my own converter that handle both the TLF Cabrillo format and the propper Cabrillo format.
Anyway when I have looked at the writecabrillo.c yesterday night I discovered that there is a function for writing the ADIF logs as well.
I have looked as well at the section for writing "his call" in cabrillo but did not recognized any problem. It seems like the his call is placed one space after the "sent repport" field, and did not bother about the absolute position. But I am not sure and I did not experimented with the code yet.
I mainly program in ADA and Java and i have very limited knowladge from C.
/piotr
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Ed
<address@hidden> wrote:
Piotr Tomczak wrote:
Hi friends...
I have discovered lately that there is some small missmatch in the Cabrillo
file generated with TLF compared to both the standard and the other log
programs.
The difference is in the QSO data.
In the received info CALL field. In the Cabrillo specification the second
CALL field starts at the position 56 if indexed from 1, while the TLF place
it in the position 54 if indexed from the begining.
Not a big problem but some Cabrillo to Adif converters complain about this
specification mismatch.
Has any body else noticed this situation ?
Does any body will try to verify it ?
I may try to look at the code myself to see first how it looks like in the
code.
/piotr SM7YEA.
Ed W3NR