[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Texmacs-dev] Style questions in scheme
From: |
Joris van der Hoeven |
Subject: |
[Texmacs-dev] Style questions in scheme |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 16:16:31 +0100 (MET) |
> One small thing I noticed along these lines: wouldn't
>
> (let* (
> (name0 (binding1))
> (name1 (binding0))
> ...)
> ...
>
> be better than
>
> (let* ((name0 (binding1))
> (name1 (binding0))
> ...)
> ...
>
> ? I know, it's less compact, but this way, all bindings are indented
> likewise. The first binding is no more special than any of the others,
> right ?
In fact the right way is
(let* ((name0 ...)
(name1 ...))
...)
In Emacs' Scheme-mode (yes there will once be a TeXmacs Scheme mode),
you will automatically obtain these indentations. In general,
it is good to mimick the indentation style in the existing code.
I also recommend to load the "tm-mode.el" in your .emacs file.
This will highlight additional TeXmacs keywords and correctly indent them.