[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposals for new XML
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: proposals for new XML |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:05:17 GMT |
So no commandarg for +, ok?
I'm confused again. I was thinking of commandarg="..." as the literal
string given to @itemize, not anything parsed. Otherwise, why have it
in some cases (@minus) and not others (+)?
I understand (I think :) how there has to be an element too, regardless,
with the structure of the argument, for those uncommon instances where
it exists.
I am actually asking whether
the Texinfo XML should conform to that tree too... So I guess this is
a yes :-)
Yes.