RE: [Swftools-common] swftools and png support

[Philippe Maurer]

I am using PNG files because they behave better when the movie is resized.
File size is important I agree with you, but graphical quality is more
important for me.

Philippe


-----Message d'origine-----
De : address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden De la
part de address@hidden
Envoyé : lundi 19 décembre 2005 15:26
À : address@hidden
Objet : Re: [Swftools-common] swftools and png support

A little off topic but.....

Why are you importing this as a png to Flash?  I only bring in pngs if they 
will allow me to have transparencies that I could not otherwise obtain.
Would 
not a jpg with some compression be much smaller? I can compress your image
to 
about 80KB from 381KB. I know it is not what your were asking but it just
may 
bring your presentation down in size considerably.

Thanks 

On December 18, 2005 04:53 am, Philippe Maurer wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am currently facing some strange bug and I am not sure it is related to
> the swftools but maybe somebody had a similar problem and can help me.
>
>
>
> I have a PNG file that I convert to SWF ( with png2swf or swfc the result
> is the same )
>
> When I load this swf file in a movie ( loadMovie ), the loaded movie
> remains blank.
>
> The getBytesLoaded function never reaches the getBytesTotal result.
>
> The bug only appears in flash player 6.0.79 and not in later players.
>
>
>
> But, when I create the swf file with Flash manually, the movie can be
> loaded without any problem.
>
>
>
> PNG file can be found here:
>
> http://ns2488.ovh.net/~webatome/dev/helico.png
>
>
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Philippe

-- 
Chris Cherrett
Tracking Solutions International
1-877-TSIWARE
www.tsiware.com

TSI Web Design
1-877-874-9273
www.tsiwebdesign.com


_______________________________________________
Swftools-common mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/swftools-common