stumpwm-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [STUMP] Making StumpWM more modular


From: Mehul Sanghvi
Subject: Re: [STUMP] Making StumpWM more modular
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:37:47 -0400

That sounds great.  I'll start looking into it over the next few days.




On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) <address@hidden> wrote:
But you could apt-get install sbcl and clisp on travis-ci.

There is also a cl-travis[1] project provides template for travis integration.

[1] https://github.com/luismbo/cl-travis

Kanru

Mehul Sanghvi <address@hidden> writes:

> travis-ci does not provide SBCL or CLISP support.
>
> I'd be interested to help with this, as CI is what I do on a daily basis.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Quentin Stievenart <
> address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I think that this is generally a good idea. Splitting up stumpwm
>> architecture in multiple, smaller packages that are still part of
>> stumpwm is certainly a good idea.
>>
>> However, I see a minor problem when splitting packages into a
>> different projects (as for the keysyms): we should be careful that it
>> won't create compatibility problems if ever the library interface is
>> changed and stumpwm's source is not updated fast enough.
>>
>> I guess that keeping stumpwm related libraries under the stumpwm
>> organization is the way to go to avoid this. Having a buildbot (or
>> travis-ci) being run on every commit of stumpwm and it's libraries
>> could also help.
>>
>> On 17 September 2014 16:36, David Bjergaard <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > There's been some discussion on the issue tracker about repackaging some
>> > of the code in stumpwm to be more modular.  Some pieces are useful to
>> > other projects in the CL ecosystem, and others have a semantic
>> > difference from the rest of the core of stumpwm.
>> >
>> > In my short time as package maintainer, I've always appreciated the
>> > input from the community, so if you have strong opinions please give
>> > them here.
>> >
>> > You can catch up on some details of the discussion here:
>> > https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/pull/146
>> > https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/pull/125
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> >     Dave
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Stumpwm-devel mailing list
>> > address@hidden
>> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Stumpwm-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
>>



--
Mehul N. Sanghvi
email: address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]