[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [STUMP] (sub-modules) / Contrib

From: Michael Raskin
Subject: Re: [STUMP] (sub-modules) / Contrib
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:36:02 +0400

>So just to be clear: we should totally use ASDF, and using ASDF is
>enough for quicklisp. I think quicklisp is a good thing, and I think
>that all or most of the *current* hard core stump users are also
>quicklisp users. That's great. I just want to make sure that when we
>design the workflow for installing contrib modules we have something
>that makes sense for users who aren't necessarily like us.
>(I think the emacs analogy is decent. And to be fair, I compile emacs
>myself, from sources but I don't expect that other people will do the

May I ask a simple question?

Can't we build QuickLisp into the StumpWM binary for novice users?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]