Re: [STUMP] Please consider removing module.lisp.in.

[Desmond O. Chang]

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 15:53, Ben Spencer <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> The debian package is one approach, but I don't think it's
> unreasonable to assume that other distros might want to simply
> distribute a binary.

Just for reference.

> If you're generating your own version.lisp anyway, why can't you
> generate your own module.lisp?  I'm not really clear what problem
> you're trying to solve.

I have to regenerate version.lisp because the version numbers of
upstream and debian are different.  The script is written by the
previous maintainer.  IMHO This regenerating can be removed.

It's not important.  I just want to discuss how to load stumpwm
without ./configure.