[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] fselect to support >10 frames
From: |
John Li |
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] fselect to support >10 frames |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:18:20 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:50:36PM +0100, Bob Farrell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:06:29AM -0400, John Li wrote:
>
> > Yes, you can reach up to 36 frames by using an alphanumeric
> > *frame-number-map*, but this way, you can have 1,000 frames all
> > accessible with at most 3 keystrokes - which would likely be a
> > distinguishing stumpwm feature (try using Exposé there!), and it's
> > clearly the direction we're going in as people get larger screens and
> > multi-head desktops =).
> >
> >
> I think you're insane. 36 is easily enough. John.
Wrong.
http://circularly.org/tmp/frames.png
So very wrong.
Yrs,
John