Re: [STUMP] Hangs with run-shell-command

[Julian Stecklina]

Milan Zamazal <address@hidden> writes:

>     JS> Could you post this to the SBCL people? Perhaps you can build a
>     JS> minimal example outside of stumpwm. I guess, it would be quite
>     JS> helpful in solving this problem.
>
> I'll try when I have some time...

I also have problems with a non-responsive stumpwm with SBCL 1.0.16. It
happened when I left my box unattended for the night. I'll try to
rewrite contrib/{cpu,battery}.lisp to not use run-shell-command. Perhaps
this makes a difference.


Btw, is it okay to introduce new dependencies? I am thinking of osicat
to remove implementation-dependent code in wrappers.lisp. Any comments
on that?

Regards,
-- 
Julian Stecklina

Well, take it from an old hand: the only reason it would be easier to
program in C is that you can't easily express complex problems in C,
so you don't. - Erik Naggum (in comp.lang.lisp)

(Spam-Experiment: http://cthulhu.c3d2.de/~astro/badpit.html )

pgpOpBccn6Nae.pgp
Description: PGP signature