Re: [STUMP] *debug-level*

[David O'Toole]

address@hidden writes:

> Do you have (in-package :stumpwm) at the beginning of your
> stumpwmrc? Because you should.

I do; I've attached my configs.

>> If stump starts eating CPU again, I'll repost the new nohup.out.
>
> There are far better ways (for lisp) than strace to trace in
> that situation, the problem is that they require prior
> warning, and I've never had a sure-fire way of reproducing
> this state. If this is something that happens regularly for
> you we can turn on tracing in StumpWM and determine if the
> looping is occurring in the context of StumpWM or in the
> context of the Lisp system (I suspect the latter).

Ok, I will keep you informed. So far it's been just fine for a few days...

-- 
David O'Toole <address@hidden>
http://dto.freeshell.org/notebook/