[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?
From: |
Daniel Kahn Gillmor |
Subject: |
Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 May 2010 16:51:35 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100411 Icedove/3.0.4 |
Thanks for the quick followup, Ted!
On 05/27/2010 04:37 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
> This is all rather new. Here's the recent timeline:
>
> * On May 6th, Matt Lee posted to this list (social-discuss) with
> the subject line "The next step". This email outlined a new plan
> for the GNU Social project:
This is the full message for those who want to read the archives:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/social-discuss/2010-05/msg00015.html
i actually had read most of that message but i confess i'd missed this
crucial framing of the re-direction amid the eloquent statement of the
problems with centralized social networks. The message also ends with:
>> What does the protocol look like? We'll be working with some of the best
>> people out there in the free software and social web communities to
>> bring you that answer.
Which is not exactly a call for contributions (unless the reader has a
huge ego ;P ).
> * Since then very little discussion on this topic has happened, on
> this list or on address@hidden (in fact, that list has about two
> threads IIRC).
this is the first i'm hearing of address@hidden can you explain the
difference between that list and this one? why is that list not listed
on the wiki?
> People need to speak up about this protocol we're supposedly developing,
> otherwise this project will rapidly lose relevance and die. Someone
> might do what we're trying to do now, but I'd rather not leave that up
> to chance.
Yes, agreed! Perhaps a small number of framing questions would be
useful to get the discussion going?
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Matija Šuklje, 2010/05/27
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson, 2010/05/27
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Ted Smith, 2010/05/27
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2010/05/27
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Ted Smith, 2010/05/27
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <=
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Ted Smith, 2010/05/27
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Matt Lee, 2010/05/27
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Jameson Rollins, 2010/05/27
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Matt Lee, 2010/05/27
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2010/05/27
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Matt Lee, 2010/05/27
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Ted Smith, 2010/05/27
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Matt Lee, 2010/05/27
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Ted Smith, 2010/05/28
- Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?, Dan Brickley, 2010/05/28