[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?
|
From: |
Matt Lee |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:45:13 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.1 |
On 03/04/2010 08:38 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
> I want to be able to point to GNU Social and daisycha.in as a drop-in
> replacement for non-free network services.
I don't want anyone to create a monolithic service, where everyone uses
one big instance. Not for this.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, (continued)
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Blaise Alleyne, 2010/03/04
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Ted Smith, 2010/03/04
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Ted Smith, 2010/03/04
- Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?,
Matt Lee <=
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Blaise Alleyne, 2010/03/04
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Toby Inkster, 2010/03/05
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Hellekin O. Wolf, 2010/03/08
Re: [Social-discuss] What should GNU social be?, Hugo Roy, 2010/03/04