Re: [Sks-devel] Implications of GDPR

[Fabian A. Santiago]

On 2018-05-03 08:58, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 03/05/18 12:40, Moritz Wirth wrote:
> > What about only accepting valid keys and removing all revoked or 
> > expired
> > keys from the database?
>
> I assume you mean "remove the user-id packets of all revoked or expired
> keys"? You would have to retain at least the revocation signature and
> the primary key, to make sure that nobody tried to re-upload a
> non-revoked copy of the key, and to make sure that the keyservers still
> served their primary purpose of distributing key revocations.
>
> But the primary key could itself be considered personal data...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sks-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel

i support the idea of local blacklists and being able to remove keys 
upon request. but sadly i'm not a developer so i can't contribute to 
such a cause.

--
--

Thanks,

Fabian S.

OpenPGP:

0x3C3FA072ACCB7AC5DB0F723455502B0EEB9070FC (to be revoked)
0x643082042DC83E6D94B86C405E3DAA18A1C22D8F (new key)

0xA1C22D8F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys