sks-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sks-devel] offtopic: encrypt.to


From: David Benfell
Subject: Re: [Sks-devel] offtopic: encrypt.to
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:10:09 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 12/12/2013 02:38 AM, Gabor Kiss wrote:
> 
> Yeah. Who are the intended targets of this service? Peoples who
> cannot install (,stricly check) and run a gpg program on their own
> computers. Who cannot run a command line program. Whose only
> cabability is moving mouse. (So called one armed lawyers. :) I'm
> pretty sure that most of them is unable to audit any JS, Ruby or C
> code.

These are the same problems that are always present. First, there's
the usability versus function (and it is really sad that these have
become opposite poles), and second, there's the competence to audit
code, which is probably an issue for an even greater number of people
than the usability. I'm an example: I'm able to use gnupg, even to set
up an SKS server, but I haven't been a programmer since 1985 and
wouldn't have the first idea what to look for in auditing the code.

Inevitably, we rely on each other because we can't do everything
ourselves. So the questions reduce to 1) do we want wider scale
adoption of encryption (my answer is yes), 2) do those of us who have
the competence (not me) audit code (I think they will do so for their
own reasons), and 3) will they share their results (I thought this was
the idea of open source)?

- -- 
David Benfell
see https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the
attachment
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.1.0-ecc (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=Hz96
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: benfell.vcf
Description: Vcard


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]