[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Big amount of updated keys yesterday?
From: |
John Clizbe |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Big amount of updated keys yesterday? |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:58:52 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19pre) Gecko/20110410 Mnenhy/0.8.3 SeaMonkey/2.0.14pre |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> yesterday I noticed that my SKS Server was constantly updating it's
> key database for over an hour. This also showed in the stats:
>
> Daily Histogram
> Time New Keys Updated Keys
> 2011-04-12 74 65
> 2011-04-11 365 7678
> 2011-04-10 280 137
>
>
> Hourly Histogram
> Time New Keys Updated Keys
> 2011-04-12 02 13 8
> 2011-04-12 01 15 6
> 2011-04-12 00 46 51
> 2011-04-11 23 15 5
> 2011-04-11 22 15 5
> 2011-04-11 21 62 3419
> 2011-04-11 20 2 3597
> 2011-04-11 19 9 505
> 2011-04-11 18 19 18
Also seen here:
2011-04-11 15 13 3
2011-04-11 14 63 2169
2011-04-11 13 5 101
2011-04-11 12 24 17
2011-04-11 11 14 5
2011-04-11 10 14 4047
2011-04-11 09 31 1257
2011-04-11 08 13 5
> Does anyone know what happened yesterday and where the updates came
> from?
My first big hit came from pgp.surfnet.nl ~0930 CDT (US/Central - UTC-5:00)
2011-04-11 08:39:14 2892 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [18.9.60.141]:17311>
2011-04-11 09:16:59 25 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [84.45.72.144]:11371>
2011-04-11 09:20:25 No hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [88.198.253.20]:11371>
2011-04-11 09:21:22 No hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [174.142.142.17]:11371>
2011-04-11 09:23:25 No hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [88.198.253.20]:11371>
2011-04-11 09:27:05 No hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [70.85.129.92]:11371>
2011-04-11 09:28:51 No hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [46.4.253.199]:11371>
2011-04-11 09:31:44 7298 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET
[145.100.185.229]:11371>
2011-04-11 10:47:30 5329 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [64.15.152.44]:11371>
2011-04-11 11:14:01 5308 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET
[178.63.246.167]:11371>
2011-04-11 12:25:28 5292 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET
[79.143.214.216]:11371>
2011-04-11 12:55:47 4961 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [69.134.27.135]:11371>
2011-04-11 13:50:16 1308 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET
[178.63.246.167]:11371>
2011-04-11 14:11:17 1918 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET
[174.142.142.17]:11371>
2011-04-11 14:21:57 1904 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET
[178.63.246.167]:11371>
2011-04-11 14:49:55 297 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [79.143.214.216]:11371>
2011-04-11 14:51:47 12 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [174.142.142.17]:11371>
2011-04-11 14:54:42 461 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [192.168.0.5]:11371>
2011-04-11 14:57:16 No hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [204.13.164.120]:11371>
2011-04-11 14:58:39 264 hashes recovered from <ADDR_INET [178.63.246.167]:11371>
> Also this took over an hour and almost exclusively used all the I/O to
> the disks in the system. Is there a way to increase the performance
> for updates in the key db?
Reads, usually yes. Writes, not so much. :-(
- --
John P. Clizbe Inet: John (a) GingerBear DAWT net
FSF Assoc #995 / FSFE Fellow #1797 hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or
mailto:address@hidden
Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?"
A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12-svn5502-2010-12-23 (Windows XP)
Comment: When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
Comment: Be part of the £37 ECHELON -- Use Strong Encryption.
Comment: It's YOUR right - for the time being.
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=
=r8N8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Sks-devel] Big amount of updated keys yesterday?, Teun Nijssen, 2011/04/13