[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool?
From: |
Andrey Korobkov |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Are IPv6-only keyservers acceptable in the pool? |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 00:34:48 +0400 |
One more problem with IPv6 peering:
2011-04-07 00:23:44 address for keyserver.siccegge.de:11370 changed from [] to
[<ADDR_INET [2001:a60:f01c:0:70:1:6:42]:11370>, <ADDR_INET [212
.114.250.148]:11370>, <ADDR_INET [212.114.250.149]:11370>]
2011-04-07 00:23:44 address for keyserver.serviz.fr:11370 changed from [] to
[<ADDR_INET [2a01:4f8:110:1283::c400]:11370>, <ADDR_INET [46.4.13
9.47]:11370>]
2011-04-07 00:24:44 Recon partner: <ADDR_INET [212.114.250.148]:11370>
2011-04-07 00:24:44 <recon as client> error in callback.: Unix error: Invalid
argument - connect()
2011-04-07 00:25:44 Recon partner: <ADDR_INET [46.4.139.47]:11370>
2011-04-07 00:25:44 <recon as client> error in callback.: Unix error: Invalid
argument - connect()
Seems, that SKS uses IPv4 address for peering... Strange.
May be, it's because my SKS itself is listening on 127.0.0.1 and
reverse-proxied via nginx?
What about your servers? Does IPv6-IPv6 peering work in such case (dual-stack)?
--
regards,
Andrey Korobkov <address@hidden>
GPG Key:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x177A2DB9EA08BF5D&fingerprint=on
pgpqnXeV4g8EA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Message not available