Re: [Sks-devel] SKS and arch

[Sacha J. Bernstein]

Yaron,

I'd never heard of Arch before now actually...  I'd been waiting for 
Subversion to hit 1.0 before switching all of my own stuff from CVS.  It 
looks like Arch has a lot of very nice features.  If you're confident that 
it's reliable and mature, it sounds like a good change.

Sacha



--On Tuesday, February 03, 2004 9:33 PM -0500 "Yaron M. Minsky" 
<address@hidden> wrote:

> I've started using the Arch revision control system for some projects at
> work, and am considering moving SKS over to arch.  Does anyone have any
> thoughts on this?
>
> The main reason I'm considering arch is that (a) it is easier for me to
> host, so I won't have to depend on Savannah or another external
> provider, and (b) arch allows for a distributed development model, so
> that I can export my archive read-only to the world, and others can do
> modifications of their own.  Those modifications can then be merged back
> into my main branch, or can be maintained locally pretty easily.
>
> Anyway, I'd be interested in feedback before I make the change.
>
> Yaron
>
> --
> | --------/            Yaron M. Minsky              \--------|
> | --------\ http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/yminsky/ /--------|
>
> Open PGP --- KeyID B1FFD916
> Fingerprint: 5BF6 83E1 0CE3 1043 95D8 F8D5 9F12 B3A9 B1FF D916
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sks-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel