Re: [Sks-devel] Re: Type 20 ElGamal Sign/Encrypt keys

[Yaron M. Minsky]

Hmm.  I'm a bit confused.  RFC2440bis-draft suggests that V3 keys must
be RSA keys --- and the keyid calculation is done accordingly.  But your
email suggests that this is an elgamal key.  It's certainly a V3 key, so
is this a broken key?  Anyone know more about this?



On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 19:47, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > if you check out
> > http://keyserver.noreply.org:11371/pks/lookup?search=csmall%40debian.org&op=index
> > you find a key 6D1DD6B3.
> > 
> > When I download that key and import it, gpg claims its keyid is
> > A29C8EAE.  Is this a bug in SKS?
> > 
> > address@hidden:~$ wget -q -O - 
> > 'http://keyserver.noreply.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA54ABF776D1DD6B3'
> >  | gpg
> > pub  1024G/A29C8EAE 1998-07-06 Craig Small <address@hidden>
> 
> This is a key that was created with old GnuPG that still had the md-encode 
> bug, if that matters.
> 
> Peter
-- 
|--------/            Yaron M. Minsky              \--------|
|--------\ http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/yminsky/ /--------|

Open PGP --- KeyID B1FFD916
Fingerprint: 5BF6 83E1 0CE3 1043 95D8 F8D5 9F12 B3A9 B1FF D916