[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Simulavr-devel] Uniform the code
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [Simulavr-devel] Uniform the code |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Apr 2009 01:05:46 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> u.org] On Behalf Of address@hidden
> Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 7:48 PM
> To: '' simulavr-devel @ nongnu . org ''; 'Michael N . Moran'
> Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Uniform the code
> Eric's comment on speed suggests a vote against pointers.
> I haven't noticed any votes for pointers.
Please note that I am agnostic when it comes to methods/algorithms; I'm not a
C++ programmer. But instead of having bickering on the list, I suggest that it
be solved with scientific methods: code up the different ways to do it, test
each one and see which method is the fastest. Numbers and measurement should
rule the argument.
- [Simulavr-devel] Uniform the code, Knut Schwichtenberg, 2009/04/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Uniform the code, address@hidden, 2009/04/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Uniform the code, address@hidden, 2009/04/11
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] Uniform the code,
Weddington, Eric <=
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] Uniform the code, address@hidden, 2009/04/12
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] Uniform the code, address@hidden, 2009/04/12