|
From: | Russell Shaw |
Subject: | Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR + simulated hardware |
Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:40:39 +1100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030311 Debian/1.2.1-10 |
Bruce R'. Miller wrote:
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 21:49, Bill wrote:I must also point out that I hope T Roth doesn't take this the wrong way. I greatly appreciate his efforts in the AVR tools. (I know he is also involved with avr-libc) I really think that he and at least a few of us are coming at this from different angles... It is also worthLet me be clear as well: TR rules! C++ rules! (TR + C++) totally rules!
I find the complexity of the C++ language woeful, even tho i fully understand it. I find that applications are made more modular and easier to understand and maintain if the lower level detail parts that need speed and efficiency are done in C, and these modules are glued together at a higher level for the application in tcl. This also makes it easy for the application to be scriptable if required. For pure objectiveness, the higher level app can be done in python and the various modules done in C. Any gui interface can be done in Tk too.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |