[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scm-discuss] building scm
From: |
Steve VanDevender |
Subject: |
Re: [Scm-discuss] building scm |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:47:40 -0700 |
Philipp Klaus Krause writes:
> > | Previously I looked at the scm in Debian (5e5) and tried
> > | hobbit. The code hobbit creates looks horrible and broken.
> >
> > Did it fail to compile or link?
>
> Yes. For starters it uses K&R style functions instead of ANSI/ISO. AFAIK
> K&R style functions not been valid C for over 20 years.
K&R function declaration syntax is still permissible in ANSI C,
althought it is now rarely used by programmers.
> It creates identifier names that contain characters not required to
> be valid in C identifiers, such as 'ä' (and I do not know of any C
> compiler allowing these in identifiers).
I've never seen Hobbit do that. That might be a bug in that version of
SCM or Hobbit.
- [Scm-discuss] building scm, Philipp Klaus Krause, 2010/10/16
- Re: [Scm-discuss] building scm, Aubrey Jaffer, 2010/10/17
- Re: [Scm-discuss] building scm, Philipp Klaus Krause, 2010/10/17
- Re: [Scm-discuss] building scm,
Steve VanDevender <=
- Re: [Scm-discuss] building scm, Aubrey Jaffer, 2010/10/17
- Re: [Scm-discuss] building scm, Philipp Klaus Krause, 2010/10/18
- Re: [Scm-discuss] building scm, Aubrey Jaffer, 2010/10/18
- Re: [Scm-discuss] building scm, Aubrey Jaffer, 2010/10/18
- Re: [Scm-discuss] building scm, Philipp Klaus Krause, 2010/10/23
- Re: [Scm-discuss] building scm, Aubrey Jaffer, 2010/10/23
- Re: [Scm-discuss] building scm, Philipp Klaus Krause, 2010/10/24
- Re: [Scm-discuss] building scm, Aubrey Jaffer, 2010/10/24