[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-register-public] Re: [task #10776] Submission of SeNTX
From: |
Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda |
Subject: |
[Savannah-register-public] Re: [task #10776] Submission of SeNTX |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 2010 21:51:46 -0600 |
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Mario Castelán Castro
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Update of task #10776 (project administration):
>
> Status: None => In Progress
> Assigned to: None => marioxcc
>
> _______________________________________________________
>
> Follow-up Comment #1:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> 2010-11-20 in GNU Savannah task #10776: "Submission of SeNTX".
>
> Hello.
>
> I'm evaluating the project you submitted for approval in GNU Savannah.
> You can reach the rest Savannah hackers (Staff) in this list:
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers-public.
>
> You have provided a description of a free software users community;
> I'm very glad to see more free software supporters in México.
> However, you selected non-GNU software & documentation in the "Type"
> field, sent a tarball named "semece-current" and provided "SeNTX" as
> project name. Do you meant to host semece as software, or provide a
> space for SeNTX in GNU Savannah?.
>
Well we, SeNTX, need a space for discussion, we also develop some
software (semece is one of them, I put that tarball because the registration
form needed to have one), all under ISC License.
> Note that we host both GuGs and software/documentation, but as
> separate projects.
Since currently we are only on the need of a mailing list should I
describe us as a 'GuG'?, I mean, we don't need Savannah for any of our
software repositories...
> Anyway, you might want to take a look at
> https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/HowToGetYourProjectApprovedQuickly.
Already read (but I read it now anyway)...
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> "Content" is in our list of words to avoid or use with care. There is
> a note specific to "content management" in
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html:
>
> The term "content management" takes the prize for vacuity.
> "Content" means "some sort of information," and "management" in this
> context means "doing something with it." So a "content management
> system" is a system for doing something to some sort of
> information. Nearly all programs fit that description.
>
> In most cases, that term really refers to a system for updating
> pages on a web site. For that, we recommend the term "web site
> revision system" (WRS).
>
Ok, I was referring to a "Web Site Revision System".
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Regards.
>
> Item status changes:
>
> Assigned to -> marioxcc
> Status -> In progress
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEAREIAAYFAkzoWVkACgkQZ4DA0TLic4j0tACfVhEedwggeIxVRNWz0jBeYura
> h40An1ImikaVi6I1eL3g/6O8hhQ9fVCC
> =xK2Q
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
>
> Reply to this item at:
>
> <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10776>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mensaje enviado vía/por Savannah
> http://savannah.gnu.org/
>
>
Thank you.