savannah-register-public
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-register-public] [task #10002] Submission of FreeControl


From: Quique Rodriguez
Subject: [Savannah-register-public] [task #10002] Submission of FreeControl
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 23:59:36 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.16) Gecko/2009121610 Iceweasel/3.0.6 (Debian-3.0.6-3)

Follow-up Comment #4, task #10002 (project administration):

Please don't place it out of context!!  when I said "There is no problem to
use "propietary software"" I mean to use the term "propietary" instead of
"pivative".  My idea is not to use propietary software.

>> How can I correct this issue? 

> Wath issue do you talk about?. I dont't catch. 

I was talking about the text of the description of the project, to place
"propietary" instead of "privative"

> I see alredy you uploaded a tarball, all seems exept the odf
> file, it
> need the licence information just as the C files. 

I'm not sure if it needs the licence.  They are only gidelines for the
project, they are only ideas.  Ideas don't need the licence, It's what I
understood, if not, there is no problem, i will add it.

> We also need an list of the dependencies of the project (OS,
> libraries, programs, etc...) 

The original idea is make this project under GNU/Linux, and using gcc.

In the future we will need to communicate with some dedicated hardware.  In
this cases the idea also is not to use propietary software, but in some cases
this option can exist.  I think that in this situation we will need to discuss
if it's convenient.  But my first idea is NOT TO USE PROPIETARY SOFTWARE.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10002>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]