|
From: | Mario Xerxes Castelán Castro |
Subject: | [Savannah-register-public] [task #9873] Submission of VladNput |
Date: | Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:34:29 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; es-AR; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009102814 Iceweasel/3.0.6 (Debian-3.0.6-3) |
Follow-up Comment #2, task #9873 (project administration): -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 November 7th in Savannah item #9873: "Submission of VladNput" You should response using the web interface https://savannah.gnu.org/task/index.php?9873 or write to address@hidden but usally simply cliking in reply in an email client will send the response to address@hidden and your e-letter is simply discarded. AFIK OpenJDK is free software too so if your program compiles and run under it the Java issue is solved. Maybe the .expect and .tokens files can be considered trivial and therefore will not need trival notices but i are unsure. Some administrator can help in this issue?. Anyway a README files than list that *.expect and *.tokens files and say than they are under the LGPL 2.1 (Or 3 if you upgrade) will solve this. I ignore the practical differences between LGPL 2.1+ and LGPL 3+ but i are sure than the FSF have a good reason to publish that new version. There is some reason to use the version 2.1 instead of the latest, the 3.0? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkr2SkEACgkQZ4DA0TLic4ixHACfWeP7cSj3lJNxE5MTrX6DYnk6 hAcAoIrK4FjWj7D/cM27T3rFlDUbAvVx =izSU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?9873> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |