|
From: | Anoop John |
Subject: | [Savannah-register-public] [task #9014] Submission of gPHPEdit |
Date: | Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:33:15 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008121621 Ubuntu/8.04 (hardy) Firefox/3.0.5 |
Follow-up Comment #2, task #9014 (project administration): I have gone through the source files and have reviewed all files that did not have the copyright notice and the license information. I used the source tarball of grep from savannah to base my decisions to add the text to those files where there were a corresponding notice in the grep package. I have classified the remaining files where the notice strings were not present in gphpedit (as well as grep wherever there is a similar file). The following are the observations. I will need some guidance in proceeding from here. Please also see comments inline below. MIT License ./install-sh ---- GPL compatible GFDL ./INSTALL ---- GPL compatible Text files - non source ./README ./AUTHORS ./TODO ./NEWS ./ChangeLog Configuration files ./gphpedit.spec ./gphpedit.spec.in ./gphpedit.applications ./gphpedit.desktop.in ./doc/Makefile.am ./src/Makefile.am ./Makefile.am ./pixmaps/Makefile.am ./data/Makefile.am ./data/php-gphpedit.api Autogenerated ./config.h.in ./doc/Makefile.in ./src/Makefile.in ./Makefile.in ./pixmaps/Makefile.in ./data/Makefile.in Public Domain ./mkinstalldirs ---- Is this OK? 4 files from gtkscintilla project - non source text and binary files ./src/gtkscintilla2/GtkScintilla-2.0.pc ./src/gtkscintilla2/README ./src/gtkscintilla2/marshal.list ./src/gtkscintilla2/libgtkscintilla2.so.0.1.0 161 files in ./src/gtkscintilla2/scintilla/ ---- This folder is included as this is an older version of scintilla that was used for developing the editor ---- The license of scintilla is Historical Permissions Notice and Disclaimer ---- http://www.scintilla.org/License.txt ---- Is this OK? ---- The source is included as that is the version of scintilla ---- for which the wrappers have been created. ---- I would believe that this is OK since the package is currently present in debian and fedora. Or is it? PO Files ./po/gphpedit.pot ./po/Makefile.in.in ./po/de.po ./po/POTFILES.in Binary ./pixmaps/gphpedit.png The following are the dependencies - gtk+-2.0 - libgnomeui-2.0 - gnome-vfs-2.0 - libgtkhtml-2.0 All of these are standard gnome libraries and are GPLed. I have uploaded the modified tarball to the same location http://www.gphpedit.org/sites/default/files/gphpedit-0.9.91-5.tar.gz Thanks for your help. Cheers Anoop _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?9014> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |