[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-hackers] Re: [gnu.org #78894] another licensing question for s
From: |
|
Subject: |
[Savannah-hackers] Re: [gnu.org #78894] another licensing question for savannah |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 12:26:18 -0400 |
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 11:27, address@hidden via RT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is the following license compatible with the (L)GPL? (The url doesn't
> work in the description)
It's a very unclear exception, but since it only grants additional
rights, I believe it is compatible.
> Other License:
>
> RTK is proposed to be under so-called RPL (Radionica Public Lincese,
> http://www.radionica.org/rpl/v01.html). RPL is actually GNU Library
> General Public License (LGPL) v2
> (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html) with following exceptions:
>
> 1. As a special exception, the copyright holders of this library
> give permission for additional uses of the text contained in
> this release of the library as licenced under the Radionica
> Public Lincese, applying either version 2 of the Licence, or (at
> your option) any later version of the Licence as published by
> the copyright holders of version 2 of the Licence document.
>
> 2. The exception is that you may use, copy, link, modify and
> distribute under the user's own terms, binary object code
> versions of works based on the Library.
>
> 3. If you copy code from files distributed under the terms of the
> GNU General Public Licence or the GNU Library General Public
> Licence into a copy of this library, as this licence permits,
> the exception does not apply to the code that you add in this
> way. To avoid misleading anyone as to the status of such
> modified files, you must delete this exception notice from such
> code and/or adjust the licensing conditions notice accordingly.
>
> 4. If you write modifications of your own for this library, it is
> your choice whether to permit this exception to apply to your
> modifications. If you do not wish that, you must delete the
> exception notice from such code and/or adjust the licensing
> conditions notice accordingly. Package: RTK System name: rtk
> Type: non-GNU
>
> Thanks in advance,
--
-Dave Turner
GPL Compliance Engineer
Support my work: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=novalis&p=FSF
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: [gnu.org #78894] another licensing question for savannah,
<=