[Savannah-hackers-public] Licensing advice for package submitters

[Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro]

Hello, Savannah hackers!

The submitter of the goasys[1] package said:

  "(I want to use GNU public license but with one restriction: primary
   license is for None Commercial use.  secondary license is for
   Commercial use.  When this is not possible, which license can i use
   instead?)"

I can't quite understand what he intends by that comment. Furthermore,
IANAL.  What's the canonical approach?  To point him to FSF's licensing
and compliance lab[2]?


Footnotes: 
[1]  https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?13744

[2]  address@hidden


-- 
 ,= ,-_-. =.  Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro (oitofelix) [0x28D618AF]
((_/)o o(\_)) http://oitofelix.freeshell.org/
 `-'(. .)`-'  irc://chat.freenode.org/oitofelix
     \_/      xmpp:address@hidden

GNU ccd2cue maintainer
GNU Savannah hacker
GNU web translation team coordinator (Brazilian Portuguese)
GNU audio and video maintainer
DMOZ free software editor (Portuguese)
UFU FAMAT PET member

[GNU DISCLAIMER] I'm a GNU hacker, but my views don't necessarily
match those of the GNU project.  Hereby I express my own opinion,
style and perception, in good faith, aiming the betterment of GNU.

pgpV2piwkOwph.pgp
Description: Assinatura digital OpenPGP