|From:||Vivek Varghese Cherian|
|Subject:||Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Looking for project review templates|
|Date:||Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:54:41 +0530|
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 02:34:29PM +0100, Sebastian Gerhardt wrote:I updated the instructions. I also attach them to this mail.
> my name is Sebastian Gerhardt and I read on the "Help GNU" page about
> the lack of voluntary project reviewers and I would like to apply.
> Following the recommended start pages
> I could not find the mentioned macros or templates which are to be
> filled in and mailed to this list for approval.
> All links seem to be non valid anymore.
> Please point me to the current versions of these documents.
Well, preferrably FIFO.
> My second question is about the priorities of the pending projects. From
> what I understand, I am asked to choose any pending and unassigned
> project and write a review about it. Fairness suggests they are to be
> served in a FIFO fashion, but with some of them being queued for some
> time now, I am not sure how promising it would be to serve them now.
> Which is the "best" period unassigned projects should be chosen from?
If you are motivated to review more project by not following the FIFO
order, you may do that too (since more projects are checked in the
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|