|Subject:||Re: [rdiff-backup-users] rdiff-backup painfully slow using NFS mount|
|Date:||Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:21:20 -0500|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 220.127.116.11 (X11/20090608)|
Simon Hobson wrote:
You're right, of course. The main difference is that the rdiff-backup "snapshotting" would be fast (and therefore, more likely to get a consistent snapshot), and would let the rsync process churn away in the background.Josh Nisly wrote:You are correct in your analysis. Using rdiff-backup locally + rsync to the NFS mount would certainly work.Wouldn't that still leave the same fundamental problem - that using NFS rather than rsync or rdiff-backup to access the backup storage means that the system has to read the files from storage across the network in order to work out what needs to be copied ?
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|