rdiff-backup-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] incremental or differential backup


From: Ryan How
Subject: Re: [rdiff-backup-users] incremental or differential backup
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:02:47 +0900
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

I've also wondered the same thing with restore times. Maybe we should give it a test?. I know backing up my virtual machine images (around 30GB single file) takes a LONG time to make the diff. a couple of hours. But it isn't running on a super machine. That essentially is the same as a database - big file with many small changes. But I would assume that applying a diff would be much much quicker than generating one because we aren't comparing a whole file, we are just adding bits and removing bits in certain sections.

When restoring, does rdiff-backup apply all the diffs at once? does it apply them in-place? or does it generate a new file for every version and then apply the next diff until it gets to the desired version?.

Ryan

Dominic wrote:
Michael Biebl wrote:
2.) If one of the rdiffs goes corrupt (e.g. via a bad sector), all my
older backups are broken.
mmm, true I think, you should use raid or (better IMHO) a secondary backup
(use rsync).
Is there a reason why you recommend rsync for that? If I understood
the project description correctly, rdiff-backup should work just fine
for remote backups.
The reason I use rsync for the secondary backup is that I just want a mirror of the data on the first (rdiff-backup) backup machine - including (and especially) all the rdiff-backup archives. Doing an rdiff-backup of an rdiff-backup archive would seem too much of a good thing. Or maybe I just can't get my head around it.

Dominic


_______________________________________________
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3771 (20090116) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com








reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]