[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Suggestion for documentation change
From: |
dean gaudet |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Suggestion for documentation change |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:28:11 -0800 (PST) |
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Michael Stucki wrote:
> Hi Dean,
>
> > actually i think the man page is totally misleading -- --no-compare-inode
> > affects *only* hardlinked files. it doesn't affect any other files.
>
> Well, since it solved my problem, and since mounted shares are not
> hardlinked (right?) there must be some more effects...
nope it affects only hardlinks -- at least in 1.1.7:
here are the only two uses of compare_inode:
elif ((key == 'inode' or key == 'devloc') and
(not self.isreg() or self.getnumlinks() == 1
or
not Globals.compare_inode or
not Globals.preserve_hardlinks)):
pass
and...
compare_inodes = ((self.getnumlinks() != 1) and
Globals.compare_inode and
Globals.preserve_hardlinks)
in both cases files with only one link won't have their inode tested.
aha. do the files on your mount have *zero* links? this code really
should treat 0 the same as 1...
-dean
- [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change, Michael Stucki, 2006/11/16
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change, dean gaudet, 2006/11/18
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change, Andrew Ferguson, 2006/11/18
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change, dean gaudet, 2006/11/18
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change, dean gaudet, 2006/11/18
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change, Andrew Ferguson, 2006/11/19
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Suggestion for documentation change, dean gaudet, 2006/11/20
- [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Suggestion for documentation change, Michael Stucki, 2006/11/20
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: Suggestion for documentation change,
dean gaudet <=