rdiff-backup-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[rdiff-backup-users] Re: [librsync-devel] librsync: ERROR: (rs_file_copy


From: Robert Weber
Subject: [rdiff-backup-users] Re: [librsync-devel] librsync: ERROR: (rs_file_copy_cb) seek failed: Invalid argument
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 10:35:09 -0700

My librsync is loaded dynamically, but I did try rebuilding rdiff-backup
with the -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE and the new librsync.   Still no luck.  This
error appears to affect the same files every time.  But as the mirror gets
further out of sync it snowballs.  For example, one of my mirrors has about
25million files.  When I discovered the erorr about 140thousand were out of
date.  After rsync'ing the files now there are about 23Thousand out of
sync.  This also happens on small files under i386 (linux and freebsd
clients)(linux servers) so I wonder if something else is happening.  Here
is an exerpt of -v9 for one of the bad files(/etc/hosts on a solaris 2.8
box):

Thu Nov  6 10:27:31 2003  Server sending (1): ConnectionRequest: 
log.Log.log_to_file with 1 arguments
Thu Nov  6 10:27:31 2003  Server sending (1): 'Getting delta of /etc/hosts with 
signature etc/hosts'
Thu Nov  6 10:27:31 2003  Server received (1): None
Thu Nov  6 10:27:31 2003  Getting delta of /etc/hosts with signature etc/hosts
Thu Nov  6 10:27:31 2003  Server sending (0): 'o\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\xbd((U\
x03etcq\x01U\x05hostsq\x02tq\x03}q\x04(U\x03uidq\x05K\x00U\x05permsq\x06M\xa4\x0
1U\x05inodeq\x07L40688L\nU\x08filetypeq\x08U\x04diffq\tU\x06devlocq\nL8388608L\n
U\x05nlinkq\x0bK\x01U\x05mtimeq\x0cJ\x10\xe9\xa9?U\x03gidq\rK\x0cU\x05atimeq\x0e
JQ\x84\xaa?U\x04typeq\x0fU\x03regq\x10U\x04sizeq\x11L3411836L\nuK\x01t.f\x00\x00
\x00\x00\x00\x00\x0ers\x026O\x00\x00\x00\x00\x004\x0f|\x00c\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\
x00\x00'
librsync: ERROR: (rs_file_copy_cb) seek failed: Invalid argument
librsync: ERROR: (rs_job_complete) patch job failed: IO error
Thu Nov  6 10:27:26 2003  UpdateError etc/hosts librsync error 100 while in 
patch cycle
(helpfull I know...)

--
2 3 5 7 B D 11 13 17 1D 1F 25 29 2B 2F 35 3B    Robert Weber
3D 43 47 49 4F 53 59 61 65 67 6B 6D 71 7F 83    UnixOps/ITS UCB
89 8B 95 97 9D A3 A7 AD B3 B5 BF C1 C5 C7 D3    University of Colorado
DF E3 E5 E9 EF F1 FB ... still searching ...
--------
> 
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 11:55:51 +1100
> Donovan Baarda <address@hidden> wrote:
> > You might want to make sure rdiff-backup is using the librsync you
> > compiled. There is a distinct possibility that it statically links in
> > it's own compiled librsync that is not using the required compile
> > options.
> 
> Yep.  Also (this is kind of obvious, but lots of people miss it) make
> sure that both sides are running a working copy.
> 
> > It is also possible that you have rdiff-backup using signatures that
> > were generated earlier using the bad compilation of librsync. These
> > could be corrupt. I haven't userd rdiff-backup, but you could try
> > getting it to do a fresh "full" backup, and then do incrementals from
> > that.
> 
> rdiff-backup doesn't cache signatures so this can't be the problem.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ben Escoto
> 
> --15HqYm0W=.UC2D,9
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE/qfZ3+owuOvknOnURAkV7AJ9imACaXTCx68fXyfZe1io9a0VdFQCfc9hE
> VFAC+djbPSGE2D2p49OfIO8=
> =6g1E
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> --15HqYm0W=.UC2D,9--
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> librsync-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/librsync-devel

--------

----------
Status: by weberr Thu Nov  6 10:09:37 2003
----------





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]