[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[qvm86-devel] Re: Support for Win9x/WinME guests? (Badly needed)
From: |
Sundial Services |
Subject: |
[qvm86-devel] Re: Support for Win9x/WinME guests? (Badly needed) |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:14:57 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.9.3 |
Sundial Services wrote:
> kqemu: exception, index=0e errcode=0016:
> EAX=80279880 EBX=00000158 ECX=00000f4f EDX=0000015f
> ESI=80277340 EDI=00004780 EBP=00001e42 ESP=00001de6
> EIP=00002b23 EFL=00000202 [-------] CPL=3 II=0 A20=1 HLT=0
> ES =0117 80279880 01000fff 8080f327
> CS =014f 00011e60 0000d21f 0000fb01
> SS =00cf 00021bf0 00001fff 0000f302
> DS =0177 00000000 0000ffff 0040f700
> FS =0167 0001f080 00004b9f 0000f301
> GS =008f 80003000 00001fff 8000f300
> LDT=00b8 80003000 00001fff 80008200
> TR =0018 c0001384 00002069 c0008900
> GDT= c0074c0f 000001ff
> IDT= 800aa000 000002ff
> CR0=e0000013 CR2=8027e000 CR3=0068d000 CR4=00000250
>
> Notice that the last two entries use the address "00002b23." I surmise
> from my dim knowledge of return-codes that code 0016 is "protection fault
> on write."
Still hoping that someone out there is listening ... :( ... I'm curious that
the EIP is all-zeroes in the high order word: 00002B23. A reference to the
low-order pages of memory.
Under the simulator, no exception occurs.
Is the message bogus, or is the true cause of the problem the low address?
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [qvm86-devel] Re: Support for Win9x/WinME guests? (Badly needed),
Sundial Services <=